Channel
@stylist_angelina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
60subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001989617696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stylist_angelina |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 30 November 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stylist_angelina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 60 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 61 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 62 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 64 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 64 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 20 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 13 | 46.4% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 14.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2024 to 20 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дорогие мои девочки, я уехала в Китай! Снова😅 И пока я тут у меня есть возможность закупать классные вещи и аксессуары по выгодным ценам, так что велком https://t.me/angelina_shopping
❤2
Signed Ангелина Гринь Стилист
Болеро- по функционалу ровно такая же вещь как и кардиган, жакет и тд. И конечно же существовать в любом стилистическом направлении (на пример: белая вязка - рустикальный, трикотаж на резинках - современный минимализм) Что важно понять перед покупкой: 1.Есть ли подходящие топы под этот фасон? 2.Выбираем цвет, опираясь на палитру гардероба. ❗️Если палитры еще нет, обязательно надо сделать. Экономим деньги и время …
👍2
Signed Ангелина Гринь Стилист
Кто первый встал того и тапки😁 Вчера Вика @Vniknee скинула мне ссылку на балеро, https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/230617883/detail.aspx?targetUrl=SI&size=364159909 вот, что я с ним придумала: 1️⃣ образ с трендовыми джинсами, на самом деле можно с любыми, впрочем как и кроссы тоже на вкус и цвет. 2️⃣с юбкой макси и на голое тело или бюстгальтер. Такая секси-кошечка в берете. 3️⃣ ну тут мне на глаза попались принты…
❤🔥3❤1🍓1
Signed Ангелина Гринь Стилист
Я всегда говорю, что мне под силу стилизовать абсолютно любую вещь! Как насчет того, чтобы проверить меня на прочность?😈 Красавицы мои, если у вас: •есть вещь, которую вы давно не носите, потому что «не понятно с чем ее носить» •купили что-то в порыве эйфории и скидок •вещь, которую хотите купить, но не понимаете, как ее стилизовать… Присылайте изображение сюда в комментарии, и я создам для вас несколько образов и…
🔥6
Signed Ангелина Гринь Стилист
«Ваши вещи безнадежно устарели» Наверняка замечали за собой, что не носите вещь, потому что она «старая», хотя еще не потеряла свой товарный вид и вообще-то до сих пор вам нравится… И даже секси Бодров выглядит как бабуля в своем нелепом наряде. А в чем собственно дело то? Во-первых: Эту хрень про устаревшие вещи мы оставим для программы «Снимите это немедленно»😁 Во-вторых: абсолютно любую вещь можно стилизовать …
👍3❤1
Signed Ангелина Гринь Стилист
А, если серьезно, почему так происходит? Ваши версии
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ангелина Гринь Стилист
Просто не смогла пройти мимо…😂 #ржака
🔥2👍1😁1
Signed Ангелина Гринь Стилист
Ну и, конечно, вишенка на торте! Я была в шоке, и совершенно не ожидала, что меня выбрали из 10 стилистов🥹 Считаю, это успех!
🔥5
Signed Ангелина Гринь Стилист
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @stylist_angelina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А, если серьезно, почему так происходит? Ваши версии
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2024 to 20 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Твой Друг Стилист” (@stylist_angelina), 60 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stylist_angelina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.