Channel
@styleshopping6
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003891627839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @styleshopping6 |
| Description | Стилист-имиджмейкер Психолог |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 5 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/styleshopping6 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 26 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
132 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 45.5% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 22.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 11.4% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 3.79% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.03% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 2.27% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.758% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.758% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.758% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 26 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иногда мы приходим на примерку не за вещами — а за собой. За тем, чтобы увидеть себя по-новому. Почувствовать, как меняется состояние. Особенно в те периоды, когда внутри звучит «я какая-то недо…» Недостаточно красивая, недостаточно уверенная, недостаточно «та самая». И вдруг — в отражении в зеркале — это ощущение начинает растворяться. Потому что ты смотришь на себя внимательнее. С заботой. С интересом. И понимаеш…
❤8🔥7👍2
Channel name was changed to «Стиль. Шопинг»
Video, posted without a caption
🔥4❤🔥1
Вторая девушка типаж сложный романтик. При подборе образов было ощущение, что сложный романтик - это реально сложно. Как отразить сложность, загадку и глубину человека? Не знаю сколько кругов я навернула по Lime с поиском, но в итоге получилось классно) Для сложного романтика подходит разность текстур, наслоения, жатые ткани, драпировка, мерцание. Как вам образы?😍
❤5🔥3👍1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥4❤1
Вчера состоялся двойной шопинг, пришлось "попотеть")) Очень устала, но сегодня пересматриваю фото и любуюсь красотой девушек и их образами. Первая девушка, девочка, типаж натурал. Оказалось ей всего 12 лет) Для типажа Натурал подходят простые, свободные формы, мягкие, уютные текстуры. Это ощущение уюта, тепла, доверия, принятия и комфорта. Типаж Натурал это и этнические черты во внешности. У модели были эти черты, к…
🔥7❤2👍1
Шоппинг для типажа наивный романтик Это второй шоппинг в рамках обучения. Сначала мы выбираем вещи, которые подходят наивному романтику, а потом миксуем их и стилизуем образ с помощью профессионального стилиста Татьяны Фёдоровой. Как вам образы?
❤5❤🔥2
И еще один пример: драма в своем гармоничном образе (Мария Мельникова) и натурал (Юлия Пересильд) в драматическом образе. Драма- это про яркость, эпотаж, сексуальность, это внутренний огонь. Черно-красный цвет, пульсирующая форма - подчёркивают эти грани. Мария намного гармоничнее смотрится в этом образе.
❤🔥4❤3🥴2👍1
Сегодня хочу показать, как одежда и цвет могут менять образ и создавать разные впечатления на примере типажа драма и наивного романтика. Наивный романтик это про легкость, нежность, сказку, веру в сказку, веру во все самое лучшее, это душа ребенка, это радость, это человек - праздник. Цвета наивного романтика: это пастельные нежные оттенки, это ягодные "вкусные" цвета. Посмотрите на фото, как меняется лицо и об…
❤🔥2💯2
В стиле очень много психологии. Когда на уроке мы разбирали Наивного романтика, я стала вспоминать кто из знакомых и родных подходит к этому типажу. И нашла много совпадений по характеру. Самое главное, что все это можно подчеркнуть одеждой и человек будет более гармонично выглядеть и ощущаться. А есть ли среди вас Наивные романтики? За каждое "да"- 1 балл. Пишите, что у вас получится🫶 1. Я не люблю глубоких …
❤4❤🔥3🥰1
Девочки- драматики, если вам что-то понравилось, пишите в личку, скину артикулы💌
❤🔥3🔥3❤2🍓1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5⚡2🍓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @styleshopping6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,222,355 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стиль. Шопинг” (@styleshopping6), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/styleshopping6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.