Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Клюква в сакуре

@stupidsakura

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,228subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001136468823
TypeChannel
Username@stupidsakura
Created25 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stupidsakura

Growth

2,2282,2302,2296 August 2026 — 2,230 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,230 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,228 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,228–2,230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:372,228-2
6 Aug 2026, 06:032,230no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:202,230first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.3%
avg views ÷ 2,228 subscribers
Avg views / post
563
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held18 (31 August 202531 July 2026)
Views total563
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

955 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥31432.9%
😁28529.8%
19520.4%
🥰535.55%
🤯373.87%
👍272.83%
💯222.30%
❤‍🔥70.733%
🍌40.419%
🍾40.419%
🏆30.314%
10.105%
😱10.105%
🤝10.105%
🫡10.105%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 955reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC563 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Неделю назад вышел очень симпатичный рогалик-декбилдер Worlds Upon The Wind с японской эстетикой. По сюжету мир распался на десять тысяч осколков, и игроку предстоит восстанавливать жизнь и цивилизацию с помощью колоды иероглифов-действий. Что прикольно: во-первых, практически все визуальные компоненты — задники, карты, животные, которых можно приручить, иллюстрации к игровым событиям, взяты с настоящих японских пре

23🔥11👍3😱1

4 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,120 views97 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В общем, вчера я решила перепройти Undertale на японском, чтобы потом наконец-то занырнуть в сиквел, и при появлении Папируса мой мозг взорвался. Если вы не интересуетесь играми, Undertale — совершенно легендарная игра 2015 года, в которой есть два ключевых персонажа: братья Санс и Папирус. Очевидная шутка в том, что герои названы в честь двух самых уродливых шрифтов в истории человечества — Comic Sans и Papyrus, к

🔥5829👍6🏆3❤‍🔥1

4 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,060 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А вы лучше меня или тоже не знали, что благодаря лучшему локализаторскому решению века Папирус из Undertale разговаривает на японском татэгаки — вертикальным письмом справа налево, несмотря на то, что весь остальной текст в игре написан в стандартном горизонтальном формате слева направо?

🤯35🔥16🥰6

26 Jun 2026, 15:57 UTC≈1,700 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

P. P. S. Во время изучения вопроса я нашла восхитительное исполнение культовой песни «Мурка» на японском от моего будущего мужа Амита Хатидори (💖) с идеально безумным музыкальным клипом и решила, что не готова скрывать от вас это интернет-сокровище. Все хором! Мууууркааааа, каваи омаэ нииииии, Муууууркаааа, това но саёнараааа!

😁229👍7🤝1

26 Jun 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,170 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

P. S. Если вы верный подписчик «Клюквы» с 2017 года (ебать олды в чате, конечно), то я уверена, у вас в голове крутится главный вопрос: пел ли «Дорогой длинною» легендарный коллектив «Поляночка» под руководством Фрунзе Синохары? Что за глупые вопросы? Конечно, пел! На второй минуте, кстати, солист переходит на японский и поёт куплет и припев «Печального ангела». Я часто спрашиваю себя, должно ли мне быть стыдно, что

🔥127😁4👍1🫡1

26 Jun 2026, 12:44 UTC≈1,070 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Итак, версия Амиты Хатидори! Я так впечатлилась, что сделала для вас подстрочник (плохой), чтобы можно было в полной мере насладиться видео. Серьёзно, просто сравните его с текстом «Дорогой длинною»: тут вам и тоска, и тройка, уезжающая в дорогу длинную, и огоньки мелькают, и ночи они жгли, и семиструнная, что мучала меня ❤️‍🔥 Вижу вдали огоньки уезжающей повозки, И вот я снова один. Ты исчезла, оставив позади Лишь

🔥31101

26 Jun 2026, 12:41 UTC852 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А ещё у песни «Сезон цветов» есть альтернативный авторский текст Йоко Бэппу, тоже на мотив «Дорогой длинною» и который тоже называется «Сезон цветов», но при этом больше похож на художественный перевод английской версии Those Were the Days, впитавший в себя все остальные варианты текста: у Бэппу героиня вспоминает о сезоне цветов и любви и неком кафе на задворках, где она когда-то встречалась с неким иностранцем, но

🔥31😁8🤯2🍾1🥰1

26 Jun 2026, 11:53 UTC874 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

А в 2000-х Фурю Акико написала на ту же мелодию «Сезон цветов». Текст одновременно ближе к русскому варианту и дальше от него: Фурю возвращает в песню многие элементы «Дорогой длинною» (первый куплет даже начинается со строчки «Ехала карета в долгий путь»), но при этом теряется горечь ностальгии. В «Сезоне цветов» куплеты спорят с припевом: в куплетах запряжённый лошадьми экипаж едет по тихому зимнему лесу, и путеше

🔥2720👍1

26 Jun 2026, 11:38 UTC790 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И знаете что? Когда я полезла искать этот японский кавер, я с интересом узнала, что существует как минимум четыре разных перевода песни на японский, две из которых официальные, и один из которых вошёл в учебники музыки для средней школы, а ещё один поёт совершенно безумный человек и мой новый краш… Больше всего в этой истории нравится, что на всех этапах текст не переводили, а сочиняли заново, основываясь на общем в

🥰3418🔥6👍1

26 Jun 2026, 07:36 UTC≈1,040 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Проголосовавшие за «Нет» и «Мб?», если вы смотрите на 108 человек, уверенно тыкнувших в «Да», с завистливой мыслью, что на канале сидят настоящие знатоки джейпопа, с одного плевка узнавшие песню «Печальный ангел» Саори Минами из альбома «Мелодия морского ветра», вышедшего в 1971 году, попробуйте включить песню, дождаться припева и напеть под его мелодию следующий текст: Дорогой длинною, да ночкой лунною, Да с песней

🔥4218😁11👍1

25 Jun 2026, 18:51 UTC963 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Знакома ли вам песня?

  1. Да.71%
  2. Нет.16%
  3. Мб?14%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁16🔥2

25 Jun 2026, 18:50 UTC≈1,190 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Дорогие читатели, у меня важный вопрос. Скажите, пожалуйста, слышали ли вы когда-нибудь эту песню? Не обязательно именно в этом исполнении.

😁46👍7🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @stupidsakura. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jun 2026, 18:51 UTCAnonymous Poll249 voters

Знакома ли вам песня?

  1. Да.71%
  2. Нет.16%
  3. Мб?14%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2025 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 486,582 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клюква в сакуре” (@stupidsakura), 2,228 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stupidsakura.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.