![Telegram profile photo for ✧[Ｓｔｕｐｉｄ _ Ｈｏｒｓｅ][18+] ✧](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/cf/cfbe5b6ddd995cd448ed1a21c74683f01171e60dac2e540fdb94f7febe02b201.jpg)
Channel
@stupid_horse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
157subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002555090352 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stupid_horse |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stupid_horse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 157 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 160 | +9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 151 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 152 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 22 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (22 March 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 129 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
183 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5379647912076656136 | 89 | 48.6% | |
| custom 5222311371554700374 | 31 | 16.9% | |
| custom 5220082330772717942 | 20 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5316899981775358622 | 18 | 9.84% | |
| custom 5316762551411819651 | 17 | 9.29% | |
| custom 5220107198633359090 | 8 | 4.37% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Закончила свою малышку, мех Нужно многое ещё вспомнить 🥺
custom 53796479120766561366custom 52201071986333590903custom 52200823307727179422custom 52223113715547003742custom 53168999817753586221
Мне сложно даётся рисовать своих же персонажей🥺, совсем иное отношение к чужим: их мне даётся рисовать намного проще, видимо, я подхожу к этому более ответственно! Поэтому, может быть, кто-то желает со мной трейдик? Я бы с удовольствием взяла парочку для разрисовки! Скилл для меня совершенно не важен 😋
custom 53796479120766561366custom 52200823307727179422custom 52223113715547003742
Всем привет, вспоминаю, как рисовать. За всё это время я брала стилус всего пару раз, есть ощущение, что забыла, как это делается 🤓
custom 52223113715547003746custom 53167625514118196513custom 52200823307727179421
🔤👀 Привет всем моим оставшимся подписчикам! Я безумно извиняюсь, что просто взяла и исчезла с канала и, в принципе, с данного мессенджера. К сожалению, этот год решил меня испытать: череда безумных неудач в жизни преследует меня по сей день. Но я всё ещё имею надежду продолжать и не опускаю руки! Надеюсь на ваше понимание. Планирую вернуться в строй после сезона, ещё предстоит много работы, а я так и не научилась рис…
custom 537964791207665613614custom 52201071986333590905custom 52223113715547003745custom 52200823307727179421custom 53167625514118196511custom 53168999817753586221
Рыбов 💀
custom 537964791207665613611custom 53167625514118196516custom 52200823307727179424
Ураа,закончила ещё один должок, потихоньку двигаюсь дальше Владелец поняшки - @Semgyshka_rodnaya🐱
custom 531689998177535862210custom 53796479120766561362
Увидела где-то эту штучку, захотела тоже сделать,ыа,так хотя бы вижу разницу ,но не могу сказать что она шибко велика (лично мое мнение 😶) (1 арт 2021 года,чтобы вы понимали,да было у меня достаточно времени чтобы научиться рисовать,но именно в 21 году я забросила рисование на совсем и только в 25 вернулась,поэтому считай училась заново, имея лишь какие-то поверхностные знания об ибисе )
custom 53796479120766561366
Работаем,работаем 😶
custom 52200823307727179428custom 53168999817753586225custom 53167625514118196514custom 53796479120766561361
☺️🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬 А вот и последняя ловилочка на сегодня,к сожалению единственная,не успеваю сделать ещё одну ( совмещаю основную работу с рисованием,поэтому надеюсь на ваше понимание,люблю 🤩) Итак,задание следующее,я загадала любимое животное своего маскотика,а вам нужно отгадать кто это Поскольку очень много вариантов,я даю вам бесконечные попытки,всем удачки! НЕАКТУАЛЬНО
custom 53796479120766561368custom 52223113715547003744
Надеюсь вам понравилась ловилочка...Потому что!Я делаю для вас ещё двух персонажей на ловилочку ! Но, вероятно уже она будет ближе к вечеру К сожалению,я не знаю какие ещё есть подобные игры 😀
custom 53796479120766561365
Вторая малышка Задание будет таким же,я загадала число,ваша задача угадать какое,так же до 10 и у вас есть 2 попытки НЕАКТУАЛЬНО
custom 537964791207665613610custom 53167625514118196513custom 52223113715547003741custom 53168999817753586221
☺️🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬 🔤🪸🔤 Быстрая ловилочка на поняшку с небольшим заданием,я загадала одно число до 10,кто первый угадает какое тот и ловит Всего девочек будет двое,поэтому будьте готовы (правило:один и тот же человек не может забрать сразу двух!) Попыток 2 НЕАКТУАЛЬНО
custom 53796479120766561368custom 52223113715547003744
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @stupid_horse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✧[Ｓｔｕｐｉｄ _ Ｈｏｒｓｅ][18+] ✧” (@stupid_horse), 157 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stupid_horse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.