Channel
@stupid1688
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30,652subscribers
+257 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002597246652 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stupid1688 |
| Description | 全网吃瓜 — 每天分享 商务合作 : @mumu085733 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stupid1688 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 30,652 | -86 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 30,738 | -30 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 30,768 | -43 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 30,811 | +532 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 30,279 | -56 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 30,335 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 30,359 | -36 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 30,395 | first reading |
186 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 69 of 186 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 186 (6 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 97,622 |
| Reactions total | 153 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 132 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
153 reactions across 65 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 37 | 24.2% | |
| 💩 | 24 | 15.7% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 11.1% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 10.5% | |
| 🤮 | 12 | 7.84% | |
| 🌚 | 9 | 5.88% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 4.58% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 3.92% | |
| 🌭 | 5 | 3.27% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.61% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 1.96% | |
| 😴 | 3 | 1.96% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.31% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 1.31% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.654% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 186 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 186 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 大陆之音-曝光🎙吃瓜🍉内涵段子🇨🇳 📢 东南亚新闻吃瓜-猎奇大曝光 📢 吃瓜诱惑 📢 吃瓜中心 📢 Telegram中文吃瓜 📢 极品吃瓜︱搞笑视频！ 📢 chigua 📢 搞笑猎奇视频 吃瓜群众 📢 东南亚大曝光吃瓜 📢 吃瓜娱乐搞笑视频 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
商务羽毛球 这是在哪里🌚? #羽毛球媛 #商务
Photo, posted without a caption
#精神小伙 #干架 塑胶椅子之战
洗洗眼睛😍
都说了去这种地方要看装修🌚 #技师 #按摩
还喔不喔了😁 #精神小伙 #飙车失败 #已老实
💩1😁1
阿姨也有心动失守的时候，一不小心，阿姨就主动骑上去了…… #包厢文化 #男模 #接吻 #饥渴
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️😂😂😂😂 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 182426.com ➡️ 182体育 豪礼大放送、高端嫩模、劳力士手表、奔驰E300等大礼等你来豪夺 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 1.PG电子赏金女王一举斩获830万并成功提现 2.PA真人豪赢644万一路长虹一天实现暴富 3.PG电子爆890万并以成功提现实现财富自由 4.大哥在PA真人百家乐累计盈利突破1000万 😁😀😁😁😁😁😚🙁😛☺️😉😋以及多种电子钱包存取款、大额出款无忧 （您的最佳选择，欢迎体验） 大额出款额外奖励8888-128888，双重日存彩金128888+4688每日送，周流水彩金68888每周送，双重签到彩金16888+3888送不停 😅😏😃😃🙃😢😅😚😍😀😏😝 【 #182体育 全网独此一家】 公平、公正、公开、 信誉第一、服务第一 不限ip、 免实名、免绑卡、免绑手机号码 每日存款彩金每日送，每笔存款加赠1% 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩…
😂😂😂😂 😂😂😂😂 球速体育 相信品牌的力量，老品牌，值得信赖 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 qs1683.cc ➡️ 球速体育 豪礼大放送、高端嫩模、劳力士手表、奔驰E300 等大礼等你来豪夺 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 球速体育 大会员再创新高： 1.泰国大老板百家乐存50万出512万 2.斯里兰卡神秘大哥连续5天总提4000万+ 3.实力盘总PA真人喜提990万一路爆红 4.pp电子糖果1000小注一拉爆出70万大奖 😁😀😁😁😁😁😚🙁😛☺️😉😋以及多种电子钱包存取款、大额出款无忧 （您的最佳选择，欢迎体验） 大额出款额外奖励8888-128888，双重日存彩金128888+4688每日送，周流水彩金68888每周送，双重签到彩金16888+3888送不停 😅😏😃😃🙃😢😅😚😍😀😏😝 【 #球速体育 安全有保障】 老品牌值得信赖、安全第一、保障第一 不限ip、 免实名、免绑卡、免绑手机号码 每日存款彩金每日送，每笔存…
频道适合看内容，群组更适合继续交流。 SOSO 可以直接找热门群组，也能按关键词搜同类圈子。 先打开看看当前推荐。
看到结局我就放心了
👍1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 186 posts we hold for @stupid1688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 602,374 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“每日搞笑吃瓜” (@stupid1688), 30,652 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stupid1688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.