Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Звук в голове

@stuffygolld

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

108subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002379180018
TypeChannel
Username@stuffygolld
DescriptionВ попытках не сойти с ума @stuffygold
Created30 September 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/stuffygolld

Growth

1089 Aug 2026, 11:48 — 108 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 12:00 — 108 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 11:489 Aug 2026, 12:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107–109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 12:00108no change
9 Aug 2026, 11:48108first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Videos
1
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 26s
Average length
2m 26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

266 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7327.4%
🤓5821.8%
🤝3814.3%
🫡3613.5%
custom 5411197345968701560207.52%
custom 5442990407585647162197.14%
😨145.26%
🗿51.88%
custom 535758572593402972731.13%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2024 to 17 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stuffygolld. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 September 2024 to 17 November 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Nov 2024, 17:01 UTC817 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

8custom 54111973459687015604custom 54429904075856471623🗿1🤓1custom 53575857259340297271

17 Nov 2024, 17:01 UTC826 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Привет! Сегодня первый пост из серии постов про сатурацию, теоретически-душный. Следующие будут иметь практическую направленность. в дополнение сайт, наглядно объясняющий работу звука, волны и гармоник. сайт, который поможет подобрать нужную эмуляцию, если вы пытаетесь попасть в определенную музыкальную эпоху. документ с очень объективным экспериментом — волна, пропущенная через сатуратор. Целью было узнать какие г

🤓124😨4🗿1custom 53575857259340297271custom 54111973459687015601custom 54429904075856471621

31 Oct 2024, 13:05 UTC748 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🤓6custom 54111973459687015602custom 54429904075856471622

31 Oct 2024, 13:05 UTC850 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня 31 октября, а значит у для вас подборка, которая поможет вам передать дух этого праздника в музыке. внутри — бесплатные плагины и пак со всевозможными звуками. Синтезаторы: Sonitarium – синтезатор с настроением, отсылающим к властелинам вселенной. Интересные и грязные звуки, отличные подложки под основные мелодии. Shinydirt – интересный генератор звуков, которые иногда невозможно слушать, можно создать циф

custom 541119734596870156011custom 544299040758564716210🗿3🤓31custom 53575857259340297271

23 Oct 2024, 23:50 UTC468 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤝91custom 54429904075856471621

23 Oct 2024, 23:50 UTC413 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

9🤓3custom 54429904075856471621

23 Oct 2024, 23:50 UTC373 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В дополнение попробовал записать видео (чего я не умею) с примерами, описанными в посте. Примеры достаточно утрированные, но показательны в неочевидных вариантах работы, которые могут очень сильно упростить жизнь в определенных ситуациях.

🫡8🤓3custom 54111973459687015601

23 Oct 2024, 23:36 UTC480 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Названный в честь представителя эпохи ренессанса, этот плагин позволяет высечь из безжизненного материала скульптуру с идеальными формами. Пока пост по сатурации находится на стадии правок, мне написал хороший знакомый с запросом "легкий путь, краска для мастера". События не происходят просто так, поэтому я решил поделиться с самой ценной для меня находкой за последнее время. Знакомьтесь — Michelangelo от Tone Proj

12🤓5🫡5🤝2custom 54429904075856471621

13 Oct 2024, 14:26 UTC365 views19 reactions50 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Отвечаю на комментарий: Описание было направлено на взаимодействие ручек компрессора в "идеальном" варианте, где нам важно проследить то, как это работает. В реальности каждый компрессор разный: 1. Алгоритмы ручек и их взаимодействие. (Изменение времени релиза в la2a при peak reduction выше 50, opto режим и уменьшение времени атаки при определенном рейшио в дистрессоре) 2. Убавление и прибавление громкости. (Оно мож

🫡74🤓3🤝2😨2custom 54111973459687015601

8 Oct 2024, 16:29 UTC336 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Теперь комментарии открыты🤒

🤝7🫡5🤓43

7 Oct 2024, 22:31 UTC424 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Дополнение по компрессии вокала. Пост показался достаточно объемным, поэтому дайте знать, если будет потребность в дополнении о художественной, параллельной и каскадной компрессии. В будущем планирую дополнительно закреплять информацию с помощью видео, поэтому, если у вас есть материал, которым вы готовы для этого поделиться — буду благодарен. пишите мнение, комментарии и вопросы мне в лс. https://telegra.ph/Kompr

14😨6🤓5🫡2

1 Oct 2024, 16:11 UTC530 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

если это кому-то еще может быть интересно или полезно — приглашайте друзей. https://t.me/+r9f2KHA-3zs0NWE6

🤝104🤓4🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @stuffygolld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,206,304 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Звук в голове” (@stuffygolld), 108 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stuffygolld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.