2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 986–988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 08:33
987
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:24
987
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.6%
avg views ÷ 987 subscribers
Avg views / post
163
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
18 (26 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,961
Reactions total
198
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
831
Videos
71
Links
241
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
351 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
176
50.1%
🔥
109
31.1%
👍
26
7.41%
🤝
11
3.13%
🤩
10
2.85%
custom 5210956306952758910
7
1.99%
✍
4
1.14%
🤯
3
0.855%
👏
2
0.57%
🤔
2
0.57%
😢
1
0.285%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 351reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @studynut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
На Луне предлагают построить карантинную лабораторию.
Я не шучу😆.
Целое исследование опубликовано и не абы где, а в Pub Med.
Их идея заключается в том, что все образцы, доставленные с Марса, астероидов и других небесных тел, сначала должны попадать не на Землю, а в специальную лабораторию на Луне.
ПС: образцы чего? над чем они там шаманят, что хотят увезти это аж на Луну!?
Десятилетия исследований инвазивных вид…
Почему большинство людей мыслит как стадо? Дело совсем не в лени.
Есть люди, которые думают самостоятельно, и есть те, кто слепо следует за толпой.
Так ведь, чаще всего, хочется рассуждать, в моменты наблюдения за подобным поведением?
🧠 Но вот незадача, - ни один человеческий мозг не способен постоянно мыслить независимо.
Индивидуальное мышление - одна из самых дорогих функций нервной системы.
Оно требует анализ…
Друзья! Свершилось непоправимое!😁
Не прошло и ста лет, как я завела, наконец, youtube канал.
Очень вовремя, надо сказать!
Но теперь есть возможность записывать подкасты и делать какой - то иной контент, сохраняя основную идею, во имя которой я и веду ТГ с 2022 года.
Монтажер из меня пока никакой, но кто не был в начале пути?) Надеюсь, со свуком все не так плохо, как мне кажется).
🤝Буду благодарна за поддержку: пр…
⏳ Мы привыкли думать, что время - это универсальная величина, одинаковая для всех.
Но теория относительности утверждает обратное.
Для разных наблюдателей время течет по-разному. Иначе невозможно сохранить неизменной скорость света - одну из немногих абсолютных величин во Вселенной.
Не менее удивителен квантовый мир.
Принцип Паули запрещает двум электронам одновременно находиться в одном и том же квантовом состоян…
Главное, что произошло в его мозге,- перестройка началась не во взрослом возрасте, а в первые годы жизни, когда мозг наиболее пластичен. Оставшееся полушарие не «включилось» сразу вместо отсутствующего.
Оно постепенно формировало собственные сети, которые брали на себя все больше функций, обычно распределенных между двумя полушариями.
Языковые функции могли полностью перейти в противоположное полушарие.
В норме у…
🧠 Нейропластичность обычно представляют почти романтически: если участок мозга поврежден, другой «берет его работу на себя».
Но мехнизм понимать принципиально важно, особенно когда дело касается детей с задержкой развития.
Если функция неразвита, «брать на себя» никакому отделу или участку мозга на себя нечего, а потому, крайне важно успевать по возрасту до необратимого процесса.
Мозг практически никогда не перено…
Мужчина из России прожил более 60 лет, не подозревая, что у него практически отсутствует левое полушарие головного мозга.
В свое время, на анатомии ЦНС нам показали интересный снимок. Обнаружила его недавно на рабочем столе компа и поняла, что забыла показать.
Я ни на что не намекаю, но….)
Итак, мужчина был доставлен в районную клиническую больницу на юге Московской области в связи с ишемической атакой.
У пациент…
🔥17custom 52109563069527589107🤯3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @studynut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 276,804 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Массаж Мозга” (@studynut), 987 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/studynut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.