Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 50 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,671–4,748 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 17:57
4,724
-15
17 Sept 2026, 12:01
4,739
+6
13 Sept 2026, 22:00
4,733
+2
10 Sept 2026, 12:21
4,731
+2
5 Sept 2026, 01:00
4,729
+15
1 Sept 2026, 03:14
4,714
+7
29 Aug 2026, 02:04
4,707
+16
25 Aug 2026, 19:02
4,691
+2
22 Aug 2026, 16:13
4,689
+2
19 Aug 2026, 11:14
4,687
+5
16 Aug 2026, 19:22
4,682
-5
13 Aug 2026, 14:07
4,687
+4
10 Aug 2026, 23:11
4,683
+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:35
4,681
+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:01
4,680
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:55
4,680
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,822 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,169
64.2%
💘
199
10.9%
🤩
156
8.56%
💔
121
6.64%
🕊
115
6.31%
🥰
62
3.40%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,822 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ После неоднозначных заданий ЕГЭ 2026 года экзамен по английскому кажется непредсказуемым? Этот канал поможет сохранить вам не один балл.
Его ведёт Марина Александровна, эксперт ЕГЭ по английскому.
Уже несколько лет она:
✔️ проверяет реальные работы участников экзамена;
✔️ разбирает задания не «по учебнику», а так, как их оценивают эксперты.
✔️ готовит учеников на 80+ баллов
В канале вы найдёте:
📌 разбор реальных …
🗒Проект ЕГЭ - это путь, появился из желания сделать качественное образование доступным.
Благодаря упору на качество, а не массовость, средний балл учеников - 92,3 (топ 2% РФ).
🥸 В группах на этот год осталось всего 9 мест, одно из них ждёт тебя.
✅Для записи на бесплатный открытый урок / если есть вопросы: @mdoev
💔70+ полезных материалов и больше информации: ЕГЭ - это путь
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @studylinaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@studylinaa named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@yourwaytolife named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 26 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
история и котики / ЕГЭ ОГЭ 2027 стадикэтс иик @historyandcats · 36,593 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
Masha Poche @maria_pochenyk · 52,996 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
История вокруг нас | Эля Смит | История ЕГЭ СМИТАП @elya_smith · 28,140 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
очки эксперта | егэ налегке обществознание 2027 @egenalegke · 26,449 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Кружок | Олимпиадная школа @kruzhok_olimp · 39,711 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
ПРО100 ЕГЭ История @history_ege · 29,051 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Даша Львова | История ОГЭ 2027 | Львиные истории | Умскул @lion_history · 49,640 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
100балльный репетитор | Онлайн-школа ЕГЭ и ОГЭ @stopointerschool · 43,816 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
МатемАня | Математика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор | Мать наук @matemanya · 44,270 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Аня Солдаева | Русский язык ЕГЭ | insperia @insperia_rus · 29,134 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
МГУ имени М.В.Ломоносова @naukamsu · 30,186 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 September 2026
Топ-репетитор | ЕГЭ история | 100балльный репетитор🇷🇺 @topkirill · 40,081 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
ЕГЭ 2027 | ЕГЭ 100БАЛЛОВ @egeoge100ballov · 28,794 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“lina's diary” (@studylinaa), 4,724 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/studylinaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.