Guys, your turn now🚨 Share this post, leave a reaction, and drop a comment—I did my best!
❤8🔥4❤🔥3custom 51949239070013780312custom 52742099052286780402💯1🕊1🥰1

Channel
@studyccorner
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
153subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002671236855 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @studyccorner |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/studyccorner |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 153 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 152 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 152 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (1 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,737 |
| Reactions total | 280 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
280 reactions across 13 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 26.4% | |
| custom 5211173958715459949 | 31 | 11.1% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 7.50% | |
| 🍓 | 20 | 7.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 6.79% | |
| custom 5274209905228678040 | 14 | 5.00% | |
| custom 5194923907001378031 | 13 | 4.64% | |
| custom 5445122433646358773 | 13 | 4.64% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 4.29% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 3.93% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5350763801744532879 | 9 | 3.21% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 2.86% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.14% | |
| custom 5285158176298132007 | 5 | 1.79% | |
| custom 5346063784672775058 | 5 | 1.79% | |
| custom 5348267218859751217 | 4 | 1.43% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 1.43% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.357% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @studyccorner. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Guys, your turn now🚨 Share this post, leave a reaction, and drop a comment—I did my best!
❤8🔥4❤🔥3custom 51949239070013780312custom 52742099052286780402💯1🕊1🥰1
IELTS Reading FAQ 1. What should I do to achieve a high score in IELTS Reading? A: Your reading comprehension should be strong, and you need a solid vocabulary. You can improve both by reading the magazines and articles recommended below. If your comprehension skills and vocabulary are well-developed, you'll be able to understand passages more easily and answer most of the questions correctly in the Reading sectio…
❤9🔥4custom 52111739587154599494❤🔥3💔1💯1🕊1🥰1
IELTS Reading FAQ — Everything I Wish I Knew Before My Retake After improving my IELTS Reading score, I received the same questions over and over again. Instead of replying individually, I decided to put the most common ones in one place. These answers are based on my personal experience, what worked for me, and the lessons I learned while preparing for my retake. They may not work for everyone, but I hope they'll he…
❤4custom 52111739587154599493❤🔥2⚡1💯1😁1
Dear math Stop asking me to find your x. She is not coming back. And no, I don't know y. I'm not your therapist. Although I suggest you to find one, cuz I already have too many problems.
😁7❤4💯3🍓1🔥1🥰1😍1custom 52742099052286780401
Faqat 8.5+ gada
❤9😍2custom 51949239070013780312custom 52111739587154599492⚡1💯1🔥1custom 53482672188597512171
Men ham qayta oqivoraymikana?😁
💯10❤2custom 53460637846727750582⚡1❤🔥1😍1custom 52742099052286780401custom 52851581762981320071
WOWWW, tabriklaymiz ustoz)
custom 54451224336463587738⚡3custom 52742099052286780403🍓2💯2🥰2😍2custom 52111739587154599492
Please welcome our first — one and only!🔥 😄 Nafaqat Olmaliq shahri, balki butun Toshkent viloyatida IELTS imtihonidan mukammal 9.0 natijasini qo’lga kiritgan ilk nomzod, IMAAN ENGLISH SCHOOL asoschilaridan biri — Imankulov Akmal! Bu yutuq ortida nafaqat bir insonning yillar davom etgan tinimsiz mehnati, qat’iy intizomi va fidoyiligi, balki IMAAN ENGLISH SCHOOL jamoasining yoshlarni eng yuqori sifatli ta’lim bilan t…
❤8⚡3custom 52111739587154599493custom 53460637846727750583😍2custom 52742099052286780402🍓1custom 51949239070013780311
Guys you can send any questions till 10 p.m i will answer them one by one!
❤6custom 52742099052286780403🍓2custom 52111739587154599492🥰1custom 51949239070013780311custom 53507638017445328791
any questions?
❤6❤🔥2🍓2🔥2custom 51949239070013780312🕊1custom 52111739587154599491custom 53507638017445328791
Many people believe that the IELTS Reading section is one of the hardest parts of the exam. But in my opinion, it's not difficult because the passages are impossible—it's difficult because many students don't fully understand how to approach the different question types. 🎯 If your goal is to score 40 out of 40 in your mock tests or in the real IELTS exam, you need to feel confident with every single question type.…
🍓6❤3❤🔥3custom 52111739587154599492🕊1custom 51949239070013780311custom 53482672188597512171custom 53507638017445328791
📍Islom Sivilizatsiyasi
custom 521117395871545994912❤5🍓5❤🔥4⚡2💯2custom 52742099052286780401custom 52851581762981320071
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @studyccorner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 216,265 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Farangiz | 7.5” (@studyccorner), 153 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/studyccorner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.