Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

I'm stuck.

@stucks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,421subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001146599391
TypeChannel
Username@stucks
Created29 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stucks

Growth

3,4213,4353,4286 August 2026 — 3,435 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,435 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,429 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,421 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,419–3,437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:223,421-8
9 Aug 2026, 08:013,429-6
6 Aug 2026, 04:373,435no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:573,435first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.85%
avg views ÷ 3,421 subscribers
Avg views / post
166
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 May 20257 August 2026)
Views total166
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 32s
Average length
3m 46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 00:21 UTC166 viewsread 7 August 2026

نسيت اكللكم ستك صار عمرها ٩ سنوات

22 May 2026, 01:04 UTC956 viewsread 7 August 2026

معذب من هجره، اشكو بعادا وقلا روحي به هائمة، منه فقدت الاملا في حبه لي قصة، غدت لغيري مثلا

22 May 2026, 01:03 UTC958 viewsread 7 August 2026

اعطيته ماسالا، حكمته لو عدلا وهبته روحي فما، دري به مافعلا اسلمته في يده، عيشه ام قتلا قلبي به في شغل، لا مل ذاك الشغلا قيده الحب كما، قيد راع جملا

24 Feb 2026, 23:42 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lili8c

هذهِ الليلة أشعرُ بقلبي ينزفُ شوقاً لمرآكِ، حزينٌ أمامَ ضعفِهِ و قلةَ حيلتِه. نجلس أنا، هو، و كلّ أشواقي نحلمُ بطيفٍ منكِ يزورنا. - طاء

15 Aug 2025, 23:51 UTC≈2,360 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ThewolfandthelambPhoto

سارة مُدرسة. سارة زوجها ضربها، ظهرها اثار ضرب عنيف، ايدها مخلوعة دليل على انها قاومت القاتل، جسمها من راسها لقدمها مليان كدمات، طلقتين مضروبة وسلاح الجريمة لگوه مضموم جوة شي - ممتأكدة منه - سارة زوجها تركها ٦ ساعات بالبيت ميته، عافها كدامه ميتة الى ان خابر ابوها وگلة تعال بنتك انتلت وماتت.

15 Aug 2025, 23:51 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ThewolfandthelambVideo

سارة يحيى، جريمة قتل اخرى يشاع انها انتحار، لكن النقاط الي ذكرها والدها تثبت انها قتل: 1-وجود طلقتين بمكان الجريمة والينتحر ينتحر بوحدة 2-الضحية مُعنفة ووجود اثار بظهرها ورقبتها 3-مكان المسدس بعيد عن مكان الجريمة ، والاب يگول ان عنده كافة التقارير والادلة الي تثبت كلامه.

15 Aug 2025, 23:51 UTC≈3,260 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ThewolfandthelambPhoto

ملاك عُدي. ملاك عُدي زوجها قتلها وعذبها يوم ٥ اغسطس، قبل بان بيوم. ملاك همين من البصرة، ملاك ضافوها لكروب بالواتساب بيه امها وابوها واخوها .. وعرف زوجها وبحجة " الكروبات تسويلنا مشاكل " قتلها. عنفها، عذبها .. مثل بجثتها، طعنها اكثر من ٤ مرات بجسمها وحاولت تهرب منه ف هل اكتفى؟ لا ضربها بشي حديدي قوي على راسها الى ان نزفت وماتت.

2 Jul 2025, 21:22 UTC≈2,400 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Thewolfandthelamb

" ذلك الرجل الذي بدا وكأن حياته كلها قد كتبت بحبر من القلق عاش كمن يمشي على حافه هاوية لا قرار لها في قلب الليل. كان يجلس وحده محاصرًا بجدران غرفته الضيقة، يسمع صدى افكاره وهي تتردد كضربات مطرقة على روحه. كان والده ظلًا ثقيلًا يخنق انفاسه، فيما وظيفته المكتبية الخانفة تسرق منه ماتبقى من احلامه. احب. لكنه لم يجرؤ على الاقتراب وكتب كما لو كان يحفر كلماته في لحمه، يرسم عالم يملؤه العبث والوحدة. عالمًا يشبهه تمامًا .. كا

2 Jul 2025, 21:22 UTC≈2,290 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ThewolfandthelambPhoto

3 يوليو 1883 .. يوم ميلاد الكاتب فرانز كافكا، هو كاتب تشيكي يهودي كتب بالألمانية، رائد الكتابة الكابوسية. يُعدّ أحد أفضل أدباء الألمان في فن الرواية والقصة القصيرة تُصنّف أعماله بكونها واقعيّة عجائبية. عادةً ما تتضمّن قصصه أبطالاً غريبي الأطوار يجدونَ أنفسهم وسطَ مأزِقٍ ما في مشهدٍ سرياليّ، يُعزى ذلك للمواضيع النفسية التي يتناولها في أعمالِه مثل الاغتراب الاجتماعي والقلق والذعر والشعور بالذنب والعبثيّة. أكثر أعماله ش

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stucks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 497,158 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“I'm stuck.” (@stucks), 3,421 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stucks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.