Channel
@stroy_content
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
150subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002376719052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stroy_content |
| Description | Создаю контент для сферы недвижимости копирайтинг | дизайн | SMM На канале рассказываю про • локации Москвы • жилые комплексы • стейджинг готового ремонта Написать мне: @romantrf |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stroy_content |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 150 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 150 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (11 February 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 54 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
145 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5215471039135362310 | 25 | 17.2% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 17.2% | |
| custom 5906501160751074559 | 14 | 9.66% | |
| custom 5328295178551698770 | 12 | 8.28% | |
| custom 5442990407585647162 | 11 | 7.59% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 7.59% | |
| custom 5212933628291461138 | 9 | 6.21% | |
| custom 5397741170480674886 | 5 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5397863512624100551 | 2 | 1.38% | |
| custom 5469719183069555135 | 2 | 1.38% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.38% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.69% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♠️ А кто козырь в вашем районе? Район — это не только дома и дворы. Это ещё и люди, которые наполняют локацию характером. Своя колода героев, которые создают тот самый вайб. * Все персонажи вымышлены, все совпадения случайны. #районы_кварталы
🔥9❤4💯1
🌧 Когда дождь за окном льёт, как из ведра — самое время устроиться на удобном диване, взять интересную книгу и наслаждаться атмосферой. #weekendЫ
❤9👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥5
🏡 Разбираем типы застройки Наверняка вы слышали фразу «следующая остановка 2-й микрорайон», совершая променад в переполненном московском автобусе. Это привет из советской градостроительной школы. А если вы видели карту новых районов или Питера, скорее всего заметили ровные линии улиц и закрытые дворы. Разница не в географии, а в логике, по которой устроен город. Микрорайон Фасады домов здесь не образуют ровные ул…
❤10👍4🥰1
📖 Что почитать в выходные? «Больше, чем коробка» — больше, чем просто книга про правильную расстановку мебели Если вам интересно узнать про нюансы проектирования городов, районов, домов и планировок, то эта книга будет вам очень интересна. Никаких скучных терминов и нудных нравоучений — только понятное повествование, забавные иллюстрации, немного юмора и малость философии. Екатерина Рейзбих (автор книги, архитект…
🔥12👍4❤2💯1
😽Нельзя взять и просто так пройти мимо котов Даже если ты поехал в МЕГУ за новым ковром. Учитесь, продавцы элитной недвижимости Дубая. #трудовые_будни
custom 590650116075107455914custom 53978635126241005512
🌳ЖК Парксайд: когда реальность превзошла ожидания Пока весна активно вступает в свои права и делает всю работу, с которой не справились трудолюбивые коммунальщики, я хочу рассказать вам про один ЖК, в котором побывал сразу после новогодних праздников. Рекламу этого жилого комплекса я увидел там, где вообще не ожидал — на указателе в метро Пражская. Погуглил. Однако, найденная на «просторах интернетов» информация не…
custom 52129336282914611389custom 53977411704806748865custom 54697191830695551352custom 52154710391353623101
StroyContent pinned a photo
🌳 Возвращение к истокам Всегда приятно приехать в район, где ты прожил 10 лет, и посмотреть на то, как он поменялся. Как отреставрировали фасады 80х годов, облагородили лесопарк у твоего дома. Как вместо голого каркаса здания, которое простояло в таком виде 5 лет — появился новенький ЖК. Как на месте классических детских площадок появились современные плейхабы. Тропарево-Никулино навсегда ❤️ А у вас есть районы, …
custom 521547103913536231018custom 544299040758564716211custom 532829517855169877010
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52154710391353623106custom 53282951785516987702
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @stroy_content. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 983,323 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“StroyContent” (@stroy_content), 150 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stroy_content.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.