Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for StrategyOne Algo

Channel

StrategyOne Algo

@strategyonealgo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,092subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001501529195
TypeChannel
Username@strategyonealgo
CreatedBetween 1 January 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/strategyonealgo

Growth

1,0921,0931,092.522 August 2026 — 1,093 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,092 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,093 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,092 subscribers22 August 202629 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,092–1,093 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 05:041,092-1
26 Aug 2026, 01:431,093+1
23 Aug 2026, 04:561,092-1
22 Aug 2026, 01:451,093first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 1,092 subscribers
Avg views / post
184
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 April 20269 August 2026)
Views total184
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
240.0%
👍240.0%
🔥120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC184 viewsread 22 August 2026

Invoices are generated. Please check and clear the same. Send payment ss to @so_samit. For any queries, feel free to reach out: @so_samit Defaulters will be blocked

10 Jul 2026, 04:21 UTC378 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

https://www.tradingview.com/script/cUJvjyhS-RAW-Positional-Monthly-for-BankNifty/ Similarly for Banknifty, you can use this script to follow the trades

10 Jul 2026, 04:18 UTC358 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

https://www.tradingview.com/script/Mds9Vu5g-RAW-Positional-Monthly-Nifty/ Those who want to follow the strategy and understand how it trades, can also use the attached script on Trading view and view the backtest themselves

9 Jul 2026, 05:45 UTC754 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ RAWMP – Ride the Market Swings High Risk & High Reward Strategy:- Not for intraday or conservative traders, only for Positional traders who can absorb PNL swings with discipline to absorb the whipsaws and gain from disciplined trading A premium swing trading strategy for Nifty & Bank Nifty, engineered to capture directional moves using Synthetic Futures with mandatory hedging. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 Why RAWMP? 🔹 15/3

1👍1

6 Jul 2026, 04:35 UTC315 viewsread 22 August 2026

Invoice payment last date was yesterday, defaulters will be blocked by EOD

1 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC393 viewsread 22 August 2026

Invoices are generated. Please check and clear the same. Send payment ss to @so_samit. For any queries, feel free to reach out: @so_samit Defaulters will be blocked

23 Apr 2026, 04:35 UTC739 viewsread 22 August 2026

New shared code for STW ea89ab90-8834-48fd-932b-9a472fbaa185

8 Apr 2026, 12:30 UTC780 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

We will be blocking any unpaid invoices by EOD. Please clear up the invoices which were raised on 2nd April. For those who have paid, please ignore this message. We are grateful to you for timely payment

1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @strategyonealgo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Apr 2026, 06:21 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

What is your biggest concern with Trading Algos at the moment?

  1. Broker Integrations with Static IPs36%
  2. Limit Orders Related Slippages71%
  3. Broker Restrictions for Algos16%
  4. Any other (please explain)7%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Learning Markets With Manish Official
@Learning_Markets_With_Manish_B · 61,744
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“StrategyOne Algo” (@strategyonealgo), 1,092 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strategyonealgo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.