Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АРБ Про. Стратегия бизнеса

Channel

АРБ Про. Стратегия бизнеса

@strategy_arbpro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,107subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009656616
TypeChannel
Username@strategy_arbpro
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/strategy_arbpro

Growth

2,1042,1142,1097 August 2026 — 2,114 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,114 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,113 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,104 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,107 subscribers2,1077 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,103–2,116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:162,107+3
11 Aug 2026, 00:142,104-9
8 Aug 2026, 08:522,113-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:312,114no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:002,114first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 2,107 subscribers
Avg views / post
357
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (20 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,498
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 54s
Average length
3m 27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5262.7%
🔥2125.3%
👍89.64%
22.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
11.8%
2 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
434
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
437
over 14 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvNz7Cv18 July 20268 July 2026
2VtzqwAr9Hj16 July 20266 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC64 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💵 Как найти рост выручки, если его нет 11 августа 14:00-15:00 В 2026 году рост затрат требует, чтобы мы повысили план по выручке. Но собственная статистика компании и менеджеры по продажам говорят: это невозможно. На вебинаре расскажем, как работать с данными по рынкам, чтобы найти реальные варианты роста продаж, и пригласит вас продолжить разбор на семинаре 9 сентября. Также вы получите пример промта для ИИ, кото

4 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC278 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💡 Полугодовая статистика рынка недвижимости заставляет задуматься о перспективах экономики (неважно ведете ли вы бизнес в стройке) За первое полугодие мы имеем: 1️⃣ Cокращение ввода индивидуальных домов (ИЖС) на 20-40% к первому полугодию прошлого года по почти всем регионам, многоквартирных домов - на Северо-Западе, Юге и в Сибири. 2️⃣ Рост текущей задолженности банков по проектному финансированию стройки относи

5👍1

29 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC423 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌼 Коллеги, хотим поделиться любопытными результатами июньского исследования BCG о влиянии ИИ на рабочие процессы. В опросе приняли участие более 11 тысяч сотрудников из 14 стран. • 74% линейных сотрудников уже регулярно используют ИИ • 72% говорят, что требования к их работе изменились 🐴 Причем дело не только в автоматизации. Меняется сама роль сотрудника. ИИ берет на себя значительную часть рутинной работы. Вме

🔥64

27 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC436 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🧠 Искусственный интеллект не заменяет человека. Но изменит требования к нему Недавно Bloomberg выпустил материал с громким заголовком о том, что искусственный интеллект может уничтожить множество офисных профессий Мы смотрим на ситуацию иначе 🎯 Команда АРБ Про работает с технологиями искусственного интеллекта уже много лет, а последние три года активно использует большие языковые модели в ежедневной работе. За это

42

22 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC415 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔹 Возможности, которые рядом: увеличить отдачу от имеющихся клиентов 23 июля · 11:00–12:00 Точки роста вашего бизнеса могут быть совсем рядом: в коммерческих воронках и процессах На вебинаре: • Научим анализировать коммерческие процессы и находить, где бизнес теряет деньги • Поможем понять, где внутри компании будет самая большая отдача на вложения, куда направить управленческий фокус 🎙Спикер: Григорий Карлышев –

5

19 Jul 2026, 16:27 UTC445 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Новости бизнеса «на подумать» от Демида Голикова и АРБ Про На днях, некая компания Diodes купила производителя аналоговых чипов. Я тоже не слышал о ней. Обратил внимание потому, что эта новость – тренд года. Итак, с прошлого года в мире от США до Китая растет число и стоимость поглощений ради приобретения новых компетенций. 🔄 Моя оценка: 35-45% всех корпоративных приобретений первой половины 2026 года – это когд

9

17 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC437 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🖥 Коллеги, в сети встретилась интересная статья о дробных начальниках Новости от Дарьи Фильченко и АРБ Про Термин звучит чужеродно, да и fractional leadership в нашей бизнес-литературе редко встретишь. Но явление не ново. Стартапы придумали его первыми: не было денег на полноценного CFO или CMO, но нужна была экспертиза. Наняли опытного человека на два дня в неделю, дали конкретную задачу, не втянули в операционку.

7👍2🔥2

13 Jul 2026, 06:09 UTC486 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🛠 Рынок застройщиков сейчас выглядит спокойнее, чем есть на самом деле Формально масштабного кризиса может и не быть. Но это не значит, что внутри рынка все нормально. В девелопменте сейчас много объектов, которые находятся не в официальной заморозке, а в фактической паузе. 🔖 Это важное отличие Объект может еще числиться в планах. По нему могут идти переговоры, пересчеты, переносы сроков, корректировка концепции,

4🔥4

9 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC468 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⁉️ Нужны ли вы российской экономике? А вашим клиентам? Вот такой бодрящий вопрос задает Демид Голиков, прочитав цитату лидера крупнейшего частного банка, что «За пределами топ-20 банков есть классические банки. Это вопрос времени, когда у них либо ЦБ лицензию отнимет, либо они сами из бизнеса уйдут... столько банков для российской экономики не нужно». 👀 Вот реакции Демида Голикова. Вопрос миссии и смыслов, а также

🔥52

8 Jul 2026, 05:34 UTC434 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvNz7CvVideo

🍃 Чем успешнее становится бизнес, тем реже у собственника появляется возможность остановиться и ответить себе на простой вопрос: ради чего все это? Большинство программ по управлению учат масштабировать компанию, повышать эффективность и увеличивать прибыль ❓ Но есть вопросы, на которые не отвечает ни один финансовый отчет • Что для меня действительно важно? • На каких принципах строится моя жизнь? • Каким должен

3👍1

6 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC437 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwAr9HjPhoto

XV фестиваль «ПиР. Практики Развития» Тема: «Бизнес как искусство: мастерство, вдохновение, креатив» 📆10-13 сентября 2026 Москва, Holiday Inn Сокольники + онлайн ПиР — ежегодный фестиваль, который собирает тех, кто работает с людьми, командами и развитием. В этом году мы проводим ПиР уже в 15-й раз. 🔎В фокусе этого года — как действовать в неопределённости, какие решения в развитии реально работают и как строить б

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @strategy_arbpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 448,925 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АРБ Про. Стратегия бизнеса” (@strategy_arbpro), 2,107 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strategy_arbpro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.