смешная шутка 😛 ❤️— тупо я 👀— монстры в страхе убегают от меня сами •страшилки•
❤44👀26🌚4

Channel
@strashilochkii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
33,604subscribers
-2,161 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002214128818 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @strashilochkii |
| Description | — хорошая страшилка на ночь круче любой колыбели 🧟♀️ Сотрудничество: @kiposay @sportydany |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/strashilochkii |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 33,604 | -302 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 33,906 | -103 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 34,009 | -86 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 34,095 | -61 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 34,156 | -96 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 34,252 | -116 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:42 | 34,368 | -135 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 34,503 | -89 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 34,592 | -76 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:05 | 34,668 | -72 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:23 | 34,740 | -63 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 34,803 | -50 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 34,853 | -53 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 34,906 | -53 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 34,959 | -52 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 35,011 | -81 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 35,092 | -59 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 35,151 | -61 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 35,212 | -77 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 35,289 | first reading |
99 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 99 (4 August 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 98,160 |
| Reactions total | 4,811 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 05:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,946 reactions across 99 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,836 | 38.6% | |
| 👀 | 3,213 | 32.3% | |
| 💔 | 1,925 | 19.4% | |
| 👻 | 707 | 7.11% | |
| 🌚 | 265 | 2.66% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,946 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @strashilochkii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 99 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
смешная шутка 😛 ❤️— тупо я 👀— монстры в страхе убегают от меня сами •страшилки•
❤44👀26🌚4
история про клоуна маньяка 🤡 тыкай на цитату, чтобы увидеть историю ⤵️ Сегодня в новостях Ира услышала, что в их области обитает клоун-маньяк. Жертв пока что не было, но были неоднократные попытки нападение на человека. По описанию - самый обычный клоун, только нос не красный, а черный. - "Какая глупость" - подумала Ирина. - "Ну как это может быть, какой-то псих переодевается в клоуна и нападает на людей..." Время …
❤38👀31👻3🌚1💔1
VPN опять лагает? Бесит? Знакомо? Подключился — вылетел. Заплатил — через неделю всё сдохло. Игры тормозят, видосы не грузятся, даже банковское приложение тупит. Деньги списали, а интернета нет. 🙄 В чем фишка Aiden VPN: — Всё работает: банки, Госуслуги, магазины. — Заходишь через Telegram или Google — быстро и без паролей. — 2 запасных канала: если один упал, второй тащит. — 50 серверов в 6 странах. Скорость — огон…
🌚1
страшная история: встреча с любимой 👁 от беды увела, даже с того света. если честно, у меня даже мурашки пошли от этой истории ❤️— обалдеть, мистика! •страшилки•
❤58🌚4👻4
подборка интересных хоррор игр 💡 первая игра поддерживается на всех устройствах, все остальные — только на пк и ноутбуках такой + вайб играть на ноуте, большой экран, и атмосфера очень переедается! 💔— у меня нет таких устройств 👀— одааа, на ноуте прикольно играть •страшилки•
💔24👀15❤4🌚1
трукрайм история про к*ннибала из Перми ☠️ ппц какой-то, у человека не все дома! 💔— плюс фобия 👀— бедные люди и зверушки •страшилки•
👀52💔10🌚3❤1👻1
история про жуткого монстра в парке 👹 Я увлекаюсь разного вида творчеством - в основном пишу стихи и рассказы. Вдохновение черпаю из природы, так что часто бываю в лесу возле водоёмов или, в крайнем случае, в парке. В крайнем случае - потому что днём там слишком много народа. Приходится идти туда рано утром или даже ночью. Знакомые говорили, что это плохая идея, так как на меня может напасть маньяк. Ни одного маньяк…
❤26🌚4
ужасный фильм с кошмарным сюжетом ☠️ честно не рискну посмотреть а вы? ❤️— я бы посмотрела 👀— нет, это слишко •страшилки•
❤75👀23🌚3💔2
жуткая история про предсказывание будущего 👀 хотели бы обладать такой способностью? ❤️— дааа 👀— нет, так неинтересно •страшилки•
❤53👀15🌚5💔1
история про жуткого монстра в парке 👹 Я увлекаюсь разного вида творчеством - в основном пишу стихи и рассказы. Вдохновение черпаю из природы, так что часто бываю в лесу возле водоёмов или, в крайнем случае, в парке. В крайнем случае - потому что днём там слишком много народа. Приходится идти туда рано утром или даже ночью. Знакомые говорили, что это плохая идея, так как на меня может напасть маньяк. Ни одного маньяк…
❤46👀2
ужасный фильм с кошмарным сюжетом ☠️ честно не рискну посмотреть а вы? ❤️— я бы посмотрела 👀— нет, это слишко •страшилки•
❤100👀44💔5👻3🌚1
жуткая история про предсказывание будущего 👀 хотели бы обладать такой способностью? ❤️— дааа 👀— нет, так неинтересно •страшилки•
❤76👀10💔5👻3
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @strashilochkii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@strashilochkii edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Страшилки” (@strashilochkii), 33,604 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strashilochkii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.