Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 44 days, net +293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,703–9,191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 11:58
9,135
+61
14 Sept 2026, 17:55
9,074
+82
11 Sept 2026, 07:16
8,992
+125
6 Sept 2026, 15:17
8,867
+108
1 Sept 2026, 19:24
8,759
-14
30 Aug 2026, 02:58
8,773
-34
26 Aug 2026, 16:43
8,807
-16
23 Aug 2026, 23:53
8,823
-14
17 Aug 2026, 18:53
8,837
-4
14 Aug 2026, 06:55
8,841
-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:52
8,842
-5
7 Aug 2026, 09:31
8,847
+5
6 Aug 2026, 19:49
8,842
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
37s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,877 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5188472492460636376
1,701
19.2%
custom 5474138253445593169
1,645
18.5%
custom 5474400340939929882
1,478
16.6%
custom 5386863895220621788
1,363
15.4%
custom 5386669702569299256
1,041
11.7%
custom 5388748513985200221
746
8.40%
custom 5192998176809854028
509
5.73%
custom 5192954995208661572
394
4.44%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,877 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Выхожу на связь.
Жив, здоров и вроде ещё в здравом уме.
В начале лета, имея на руках хороший фестиваль и очень успешный сингл (миллион прослушиваний за 3 недели только на Яндексе, спасибо вам за это), я очень сильно загнался и зарылся в страхе сделать что-то хуже или слабее. Задал себе планку, через которую было тяжело перепрыгнуть. С этими мыслями я провёл половину лета. Всё это время я наблюдал за артистами, котор…
Это мы играли на «Афиша Пикник»!
Сейчас уже дома отдыхаем, спасибо всем, кто заглянул послушать нас. Второе выступление в жизни — и уже светим мордашками на фестивале.
Спасибо организаторам за приглашение, спасибо пацанам из пляжных цветов за частичку себя в тк и огромное спасибо публике !🐕❤️❤️🐶
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @strashili. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ксб Muzic @ksbmuz · 167,594 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
Дайте танк (!) @daitank · 29,001 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТВОИ КОШМАРЫ” (@strashili), 9,135 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strashili.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
