Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The stranger

Channel

The stranger

@strangertrh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

70subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 16 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002195335462
TypeChannel
Username@strangertrh
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 October 2026
Last confirmed live17 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/strangertrh

Growth

677068.516 Oct 2026, 18:47 — 67 subscribers16 Oct 2026, 19:22 — 67 subscribers17 Oct 2026, 16:17 — 70 subscribers16 Oct 2026, 18:4717 Oct 2026, 16:17
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Oct 2026, 16:1770+3
16 Oct 2026, 19:2267no change
16 Oct 2026, 18:4767first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
122.5%
avg views ÷ 70 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held20 (8 October 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total1,715
Reactions total52
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3159.6%
👍815.4%
🔥59.62%
🆒47.69%
🏆23.85%
💔23.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Oct 2026, 09:59 UTC28 viewsread 16 October 2026
Poll

اگر قرار باشد یکی از جهان های زیر را به عنوان هشتگ بعدی به کانال استرنجر اضافه کنیم ، دوست دارید کدام یک باشد ؟

  1. 🧩 معماهای ذهن18%
  2. 🕯️ کالبدشکافی خرافات64%
  3. 📖 از صفحه تا زندگی18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed KARO

15 Oct 2026, 16:37 UTC33 views1 reactionsread 16 October 2026

آیا تمام فلسفه چنان نیست که گویی آن را با عسل نوشته باشند ؟ وقتی درباره اش به تفکر می‌پردازی براستی شگفت آور است ، اما وقتی میخواهی نگاهی دوباره به آن بیفکنی جز مومی نرم باقی نمانده است . آلبرت آینشتاین

❤1

Signed KARO

15 Oct 2026, 07:26 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026

روزگار عجیبی است ... درک اینکه یک نفر میتواند از روی وجدان ، کاری نیک انجام دهد برای ما دشوار شده ... اگر کسی را ببینی که در حال انجام کار خوبی است هزار انگ به آن میچسبانیم هزار برچسب مثل ، ریا ، دروغ ، طمع ، منفعت طلبی ، دنبال توجه بودن اما نمیتوانیم احتمال این را بدهیم که آن شخص به خاطر وجدان درونیش این کار را انجام میدهد ... شاید به این خاطر که چنین چیزی را هرگز درون خود پیدا نکرده ایم ... بر اساس برداشت شخصی خو…

❤3

Signed KARO

15 Oct 2026, 06:04 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 16 October 2026

آنها چشم در چشم دوخته ، به دنیای خودشان فرو رفته بودند . از بی‌عدالتی دستگاه دولتی و از بدبختی ها و گرفتاری های قشر محروم سخن می‌گفتند ولی با هر کلمه و با هر نگاه از هم می‌پرسیدند که میتوانیم یار یکدیگر باشیم ؟ و پاسخ می‌دادند آری ! البته که میتوانیم ! هردو حس می‌کردند که بی اختیار به سوی یکدیگر کشیده می‌شوند . رستاخیز ، لئو تولستوی

❤2

Signed KARO

14 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 16 October 2026

تولستوی میگوید :« مردان بزرگ یعنی چه ؟ این ها همان آدمیان عادی هستند که جهل و خودبینی شان چنان است که به خود اجازه می‌دهند مسؤولیت زندگی جامعه را به عهده بگیرند ؛ کسانی هستند که ترجیح می‌دهند گناه خشونت ها و بی عدالتی ها و فجایعی را که به نام آن ها انجام می‌گیرد، به گردن بگیرند و به ناتوانی و ناچیزی خود در جریان امور کائنات اذعان نکنند . متفکران روس ، آیزایا برلین *منظور از مردان بزرگ ، سیاستگذاران بزرگ تاریخ همانن…

🆒2

Signed KARO

13 Oct 2026, 19:31 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

اگر روزی بخواهم از تمام چیزهایی که خوانده ام فقط یک کتاب را به فرزندم پیشنهاد کنم بی شک آن کتاب زوربای یونانی خواهد بود ما انسان های مدرن و کتاب به دست ، آن قدر جهان را به موضوع اندیشه تبدیل میکنیم که گاهی فراموش میکنیم خودمان نیز بخشی از آن هستیم . ما ، تماشاگرانی بیرون از صحنه نیستیم ، ما بازیگرانی هستیم که وقتی میخواهیم نمایش را نقد کنیم مجبوریم ابتدا بازی خود را متوقف کنیم . گاهی انسان آنقدر به معنای قدم هایش…

👍4

Signed KARO

13 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC38 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026

Was gewesen ist,das ist nicht mehr;ist eben so wenig,wie Das,was nie gewesen ist.Aber Alles, was ist,ist im nächsten Augenblick schon gewesen.Daher hat vor der bedeutendsten Vergangenheit die unbedeutendeste Gegenwart die Wirklichkeit voraus; wodurch sie zu jener sich verhält,wie Etwas zu Nichts. Man ist mit Einem Male,zu seiner Verwunderung,da, nachdem man,zahllose Jahrtausende hindurch, nicht gewesen,und nach einer…

❤3

Signed Téo

12 Oct 2026, 21:14 UTC99 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026

در این دنیا همه چیز منطقی بود ، به جز اصرارمان برای ادامه دادن ...

❤3

Signed KARO

12 Oct 2026, 13:29 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026

#پس_از_خواندن | یادداشت های زیرزمینی ، فئودور داستایوفسکی

❤2🔥1

Signed KARO

12 Oct 2026, 13:28 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

صحبت کردن راجع به این کتاب به شدت دشوار است ، چرا که اگر آن را مطالعه کرده باشید میدانید که صحبت های راوی بی نام ، نه آغازی دارد و نه حتی به پایانی میرسد این کتاب بدون شک بر شما تاثیری عمیق خواهد گذاشت همانطور که بر متفکران بزرگی همچون ، نیچه ، سارتر و کامو گذاشت و عده ای آنرا اولین رمان اگزیستانسیالیستی تاریخ میدانند شما وارد یک زیرزمین تاریک و متروک میشوید که درون آن یک میز ، چند برگه و یک انسان وجود دارد و از ش…

❤2🔥1

Signed KARO

11 Oct 2026, 17:35 UTC55 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

🛑اگر فوبیای حشرات دارید عکس رو باز نکنید اطرافیانتان شما را به خاطر چه چیزی دوست دارند ؟ آیا شما را به این خاطر دوست دارند که منفعتی برایشان دارید ؟ در ازای محبتشان چه چیزی از شما میگیرند ؟ پول ، زیبایی ، امنیت ، آرامش ، لذت و ... ؟ و سوال اصلی اینجاست ، اگر روزی نتوانید بهای محبتشان را بپردازید ، آیا حاضرند شما را به خاطر انسانی که هستید بپذیرند ؟ گرگور سامسا ، روزی از خواب بیدار شد ، با تمام ویژگی هایی که او را …

❤3

Signed KARO

11 Oct 2026, 12:45 UTC803 views2 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

هر دو سالخورده ، هر دو با تجربه ، هر دو عمیق و هر دو دارای چین های مواجی بر چهره پیرمرد و دریا سارتر در کتاب تهوع میگوید ، برای یک فرد سالخورده چیزی با ارزش تر از تجربه هایی که کسب کرده نیست و در ایام پیری ، در آنجایی که صدای قدم های مرگ هربار نزدیک تر میشود ، تنها لذتی که می‌ماند بازگو کردن تجربه هایمان برای دیگران است تا ثابت کنیم در ایامی که نه زیبایی ، نه ثروت و نه شور جوانی برایمان باقی مانده ، هنوز حرفی برای …

❤2

Signed KARO

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @strangertrh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Oct 2026, 09:59 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

اگر قرار باشد یکی از جهان های زیر را به عنوان هشتگ بعدی به کانال استرنجر اضافه کنیم ، دوست دارید کدام یک باشد ؟

  1. 🧩 معماهای ذهن18%
  2. 🕯️ کالبدشکافی خرافات64%
  3. 📖 از صفحه تا زندگی18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The stranger” (@strangertrh), 70 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strangertrh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.