Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for strange archive

Channel

strange archive

@strangearchive

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,059subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001700113045
TypeChannel
Username@strangearchive
Created8 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/strangearchive

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,0596,1096,0846 August 2026 — 6,109 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,107 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,094 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,095 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,086 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,077 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,075 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,070 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,063 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,061 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,068 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,063 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,059 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,052–6,117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 05:196,059-4
12 Sept 2026, 08:026,063-5
8 Sept 2026, 13:156,068+7
3 Sept 2026, 14:186,061-2
30 Aug 2026, 23:476,063-7
27 Aug 2026, 23:376,070-5
25 Aug 2026, 03:036,075-2
21 Aug 2026, 11:546,077-9
18 Aug 2026, 05:136,086-9
14 Aug 2026, 21:276,095+1
11 Aug 2026, 03:086,094-13
7 Aug 2026, 21:246,107-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:026,109first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 04s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

979 reactions across 25 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥15716.0%
🐳12612.9%
custom 545190775182958215110010.2%
❤‍🔥717.25%
🌚585.92%
👻535.41%
🤯474.80%
👾424.29%
🙈414.19%
💘363.68%
💊343.47%
🍓313.17%
😱303.06%
🤩282.86%
🍌242.45%
👀242.45%
🍾161.63%
⚡111.12%
💅111.12%
💔111.12%
7 further kinds282.86%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 979 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC905 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍾16❤‍🔥9🌭5🔥5🐳4🍌2

8 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈1,130 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🐳25🤩10👾3

8 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC≈1,260 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👾18❤‍🔥6🌚4

8 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,420 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥26🤩13🔥3

8 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,030 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤯15custom 54519077518295821518😇6🔥4❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,390 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🌚19💔11🔥6😈3🍓1

6 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,480 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👻18🔥10custom 54519077518295821515❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,650 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥14👀13custom 54519077518295821517🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈1,650 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🐳39🔥9💘7👻3🍓2😢2😈1😡1

5 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC≈1,640 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🌚17💅8🍓6💊2🙈2🤩1

4 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC≈1,530 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 545190775182958215123👾8🌚1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @strangearchive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 18:07 UTCFinal Results206 voters

какой город выбираешь для следующей реинкарнации???

  1. Порт-Морсби5%
  2. Дурбан2%
  3. Каракас8%
  4. Йоханесбург26%
  5. Гуаякиль4%
  6. Порт-о-Пренс7%
  7. Нельсон Мандела Бэй6%
  8. Мемфис41%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“strange archive” (@strangearchive), 6,059 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strangearchive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.