Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Стоп Пропаганда

@stopbotluka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

1,607subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001335378602
TypeChannel
Username@stopbotluka
Created13 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stopbotluka

Growth

1,6071,6191,6136 August 2026 — 1,619 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,619 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,618 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,607 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,605–1,621 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:341,607-10
9 Aug 2026, 23:431,617-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:221,618-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:351,619no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:401,619first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

13,399 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎13,29799.2%
👍380.284%
🔥250.187%
🤡210.157%
40.03%
👌40.03%
🫡40.03%
💯30.022%
👏20.015%
🤝10.007%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,399reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2025 to 1 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Dec 2025, 17:00 UTC≈1,210 views503 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие подписчики! У нас новое задание в Instagram. 1️⃣ Заходим на https: https://www.instagram.com/antohakrasava/ ID=46112244518 Чтобы найти новый ник по ID, воспользуйтесь нашим ботом @sntoolsbot 2️⃣Жалуемся на сам аккаунт, Три точки справа вверху. Пожаловаться... 2.1. Это неуместный контент. 2.2. Пожаловаться на аккаунт 2.3. Публикация контента, которому не место в инстаграм 2.4. Враждебные высказывания или с

👎496👍7

30 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC≈1,030 views501 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Задание для TikTok подписчиков. ‼️ Задание можно выполнять без регистрации аккаунта и не подписываясь на канал. Просто не будет некоторых возможностей по жалобам. Если выполняете без регистрации с телефона и фукция жалобы не доступна, нажмите на меню браузера и выберите опцию "версия для ПК". 1️⃣ Жалуемся на профиль: 1. Заходим на канал https://www.tiktok.com/@sputnik.by?lang=ru 2. Три точки сверху. 3. Кнопка с фла

👎498👍3

29 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC872 views513 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня пройдемся по пропаганде лукашизма 1️⃣Заходим на 1. https://www.tiktok.com/@immine64 2. https://www.tiktok.com/@artem_pul4 3. https://www.tiktok.com/@belgianrokky 4. https://www.tiktok.com/@adikadikovski 5. https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliashtenbah 2️⃣Жалуемся на сам аккаунт, Три точки(стрелка вверх для мобильных) справа сверху. Жалоба... 1. Пожаловаться на аккаунт 2. Неприемлемый контент 3. Ненависть и п

👎499👍9👏2💯2🫡1

28 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC830 views499 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья! 1️⃣ Заходим на страницу: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100004987247653 2️⃣ В правом верхнем углу профиля жмем три точки -> Получить поддержку или пожаловаться -> Публикация неуместного контента 3️⃣ Жалуемся на посты (три точки в правом верхнем углу поста) - > Получить поддержку или пожаловаться на публикацию: Враждебные высказывания -> Другое: 1. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid

👎4972

27 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC755 views497 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вычищаем пропаганду лукашизма из тиктока 1️⃣Заходим на 1. https://www.tiktok.com/@user_normal_belarus 2. https://www.tiktok.com/@kuxarenko1982 3. https://www.tiktok.com/@batay_belarus 4. https://www.tiktok.com/@evgeniy_mihaylovskiy 5. https://www.tiktok.com/@dima_1997_ 2️⃣Жалуемся на сам аккаунт, Три точки(стрелка вверх для мобильных) справа сверху. Жалоба... 1. Пожаловаться на аккаунт 2. Неприемлемый контент

👎496🔥1

26 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC741 views500 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие подписчики! У нас новое задание в Youtube. 1️⃣ Заходим на https://www.youtube.com/@novostibelorusa/about 2️⃣ Нажимаем на флажок -> Пожаловаться на пользователя 2.1 Если у вас нет youtube канала, у вас появится окошко создать канал -> нажмите "Создать канал" 2.2 Перейдите снова по ссылке https://www.youtube.com/@novostibelorusa/about и Нажмите на флажок -> Пожаловаться на пользователя 3️⃣ Дискриминационные в

👎495👌3🤝1🫡1

25 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC727 views496 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие подписчики! У нас новое задание в Instagram. 1️⃣ Заходим на https: https://www.instagram.com/ola_bondareva_v/ ID=50161377275 Чтобы найти новый ник по ID, воспользуйтесь нашим ботом @sntoolsbot 2️⃣Жалуемся на сам аккаунт, Три точки справа вверху. Пожаловаться... 2.1. Это неуместный контент. 2.2. Пожаловаться на аккаунт 2.3. Публикация контента, которому не место в инстаграм 2.4. Враждебные высказывания или

👎493👍3

24 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC736 views503 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На сегодня для вас подборка рашистов и лукашистов. Вычищаем эту нечесть 1️⃣Заходим на 1. https://www.tiktok.com/@pusskii_demon_iz_pepla 2. https://www.tiktok.com/@speznaz333 3. https://www.tiktok.com/@_alenka_penza 4. https://www.tiktok.com/@open_31rus 5. https://www.tiktok.com/@olya_rf 2️⃣Жалуемся на сам аккаунт, Три точки(стрелка вверх для мобильных) справа сверху. Жалоба... 1. Пожаловаться на аккаунт 2. Неп

👎498👍4🫡1

23 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC784 views504 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В сегодняшней подборке по тиктоку представители радикального лукашизма 1️⃣Заходим на 1. https://www.tiktok.com/@piligrim721 2. https://www.tiktok.com/@vovanbelarus 3. https://www.tiktok.com/@yaugeniybondar 4. https://www.tiktok.com/@belshkvarka 5. https://www.tiktok.com/@katryn_sssr 2️⃣Жалуемся на сам аккаунт, Три точки(стрелка вверх для мобильных) справа сверху. Жалоба... 1. Пожаловаться на аккаунт 2. Неприем

👎500🔥3🤡1

22 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC764 views501 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вычищаем болванчиков вражеской пропаганды из тиктока 1️⃣Заходим на 1. https://www.tiktok.com/@belarusochka40 2. https://www.tiktok.com/@stop_nazizm 3. https://www.tiktok.com/@sashasvirski 4. https://www.tiktok.com/@user7288785512200 5. https://www.tiktok.com/@sakharovlm 2️⃣Жалуемся на сам аккаунт, Три точки(стрелка вверх для мобильных) справа сверху. Жалоба... 1. Пожаловаться на аккаунт 2. Неприемлемый контент

👎495👍4👌1💯1

21 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC≈1,190 views931 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие подписчики! У нас новое задание в Youtube. 1️⃣ Заходим на https://www.youtube.com/@nekonezistorii/about 2️⃣ Нажимаем на флажок -> Пожаловаться на пользователя 2.1 Если у вас нет youtube канала, у вас появится окошко создать канал -> нажмите "Создать канал" 2.2 Перейдите снова по ссылке https://www.youtube.com/@nekonezistorii/about и Нажмите на флажок -> Пожаловаться на пользователя 3️⃣ Дискриминационные выс

👎930👍1

20 Nov 2025, 17:00 UTC≈1,160 views934 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья! 1️⃣ Заходим на страницу: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100057582499173 2️⃣ В правом верхнем углу профиля жмем три точки -> Получить поддержку или пожаловаться -> Публикация неуместного контента 3️⃣ Жалуемся на посты (три точки в правом верхнем углу поста) - > Получить поддержку или пожаловаться на публикацию: Враждебные высказывания -> Другое: 1. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid

👎9322

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stopbotluka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 158,410 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Главное управление по борьбе с организованной преступностью и коррупцией (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…телеграм-каналов ГУБОПиК на устройствах с iOS{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/stopbotluka/3215|title=Стоп Пропаганда|website=Telegram|access-date=2023…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Стоп Пропаганда” (@stopbotluka), 1,607 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stopbotluka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.