Мы сами в шоке, но, к сожалению, завтра нам придется отменить шоу! Вот такое лето. Следите за новостями, летом будут еще выступления 💋
❤9

Channel
@stop_slovo_show
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
105subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002710130237 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stop_slovo_show |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stop_slovo_show |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 105 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 106 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 106 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 12 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
152 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 37.5% | |
| custom 5415825426633202840 | 33 | 21.7% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 13.2% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 8.55% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 6.58% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 4.61% | |
| custom 5312168143290907819 | 4 | 2.63% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 2.63% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 1.32% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы сами в шоке, но, к сожалению, завтра нам придется отменить шоу! Вот такое лето. Следите за новостями, летом будут еще выступления 💋
❤9
Наступило лето, становится все жарче… и все потому что возвращается шоу 👄СТОП-СЛОВО👄! Чтобы распалить вас ещё сильнее! Пока вы предвкушаете все прелести летнего отдыха, мы хотим поговорить обо всех прелестях прелюдии!🔥 Разделите этот чувственный и юмористический опыт вместе с нами... ⚡На этот раз мы устроим большой комедийный разбор ваших историй: переходите по ссылке ⬅️ и опишите коротко забавную, странную ситуац…
custom 54158254266332028409❤2🔥2
Ну и что, что больше недели прошло? А мы вот до сих пор вспоминаем! Спасибо всем, кто пришел на высупление 15 марта! Спасибо за ваше участие, вопросы и смех! Мы узнали много про женский оргазм, а еще поняли, где у мужчин второе сердце. Спасибо нашему крутому гостю Валерии Гришиной, подписывайтесь на ее канал, там много интересного: @lera_talk_about_1 Ждем на следующих шоу, всем кисс кисс❤️
🥰9custom 54158254266332028408❤5
Как часто ты симулировала оргазм?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 53121681432909078194
Женский оргазм, возможно, один из самых симулируемых моментов в истории человечества! По данным разных исследований: от 50% до 70% женщин хотя бы раз в жизни симулировали оргазм. Чаще всего причины довольно простые: 🔵не хочется обидеть партнёра 🔵хочется быстрее закончить секс 🔵неловко объяснять, что на самом деле приносит удовольствие Но, конечно, настоящий оргазм гораздо приятнее симуляции! Если хочется лучше р…
❤3👍2custom 54158254266332028401
15 марта вы почувствуете это прямо на шоу! Билеты по ссылке🖤
😍5custom 54158254266332028403👍2
а-а-а... м-м-м... о-о-о... да... а-а... о-о-о... м-м-м... а-а-а-а!.. ох... у-у-у... м-м-м... а-а... о-о... да-да... а-а-а!.. м-м-м... о-о-о... а-а... ох... у-у-у... м-м-м... а-а-а-а!.. Узнали себя? Ведь так, по мнению чат GPT, звучит женский оргазм! 15 марта на сцене Stand Up Club на Грибоедова мы исследуем, как на самом деле звучит оргазм и доведем вас до… интересных открытий! Разобраться в теме женского оргазма н…
❤7🔥7
Сдерживаться все сложнее... Увидимся 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩💋 А пока угадайте, о чем мы будем говорить на шоу. Билеты по ссылке
custom 54158254266332028405❤2❤🔥2🍓2
Аееее спасибо всем, кто пришел к нам на выступление в понедельник! Мы побольше узнали о болотах, красном свете, носках и импринтинге. Спасибо за ваши истории, мнения и включенность! Увидимся с вами 15 марта! Следите за новостями
❤11🔥7custom 54158254266332028407
Кто был на шоу, тот поймет. Та самая песня... 🖤
❤6🍓5
А какой у тебя фетиш? Обсудим 16 февраля❤️ Билеты по ссылке
😍8❤6
Человеческая сексуальность изучена всего на 5%… По крайней мере, так нам показалось, когда начали глубже погружаться в тему фетишей. Первым открытием (ещё до утверждения темы шоу) стали… болоньевые ✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️. Если вы пропустили легендарную переписку с Авито про эту тему - срочно смотрите первое прикрепленное видео. А дальше всё как в тумане, и вот уже гуглим нишевые паблики в контакте, фетиш: - на ✴️✴️✴️ - …
❤6🔥4😈2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @stop_slovo_show. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как часто ты симулировала оргазм?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 13 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 878,000 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СТОП-СЛОВО.Talks🔞” (@stop_slovo_show), 105 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stop_slovo_show.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.