Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Stonbassadors Program 🤝

@stonfiambassadors

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,133subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232532598
TypeChannel
Username@stonfiambassadors
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stonfiambassadors

Growth

6,1316,1356,1336 August 2026 — 6,131 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,131 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,132 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,135 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,133 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,130–6,136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:066,133-2
9 Aug 2026, 07:536,135+3
6 Aug 2026, 18:136,132+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:226,131no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:436,131first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 1 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.3%
avg views ÷ 6,133 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,450
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.985%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held21 (1 May 202611 August 2026)
Views total13,811
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

916 reactions across 21 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
41645.4%
🔥29332.0%
👍15717.1%
🥰181.97%
👏131.42%
50.546%
👎50.546%
40.437%
🤝20.218%
💯10.109%
🖕10.109%
🥴10.109%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 916reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈1,270 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔵 Stonbassadors: July Digest Two months of summer are already behind us! Let’s look back at what we achieved together in July and what to focus on next if you want to achieve more in the Stonbassadors program. July in numbers: ✔️ 12,554 STON (~$5,500) distributed among 481 rewarded stonbassadors. ✔️ Our most productive stonbassadors reached hundreds of thousands of views across multiple platforms and earned up to

🔥854

30 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC921 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔵 Stonbassadors, the month is coming to an end, so don’t forget to submit all your work through the form by July 31 at 11:59 PM in your local time zone. Thank you for continuing to explore what STON.fi can offer both within the TON ecosystem and beyond! 💙 Create more content about Omniston’s cross-chain capabilities. Your personal experience and unique creative perspective are what matter most. t.me/stonbassador_li

28🔥10👍8🥰51

20 Jul 2026, 05:03 UTC≈7,360 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔵 Stonbassadors: June Digest June may already be behind us, but there’s still plenty to learn from it. Let’s look back at what we achieved together and what to focus on next if you want to become one of the top stonbassadors. June in numbers: ✔️ 10,885 STON (~$6,000) distributed among 544 rewarded stonbassadors. ✔️ STONfi officially launched cross-chain swaps! You were the first to test them, and every participan

16🔥5👍1💯1

16 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC≈4,260 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔵 Secret opportunities for stonbassadors Stonbassadors, it's time to reveal the secret. Over the past few weeks, we invited a small group of top stonbassadors to conduct independent research comparing Omniston with other cross-chain solutions. Their articles were published on Medium and other platforms. We received more than 10 excellent submissions and assigned rewards of up to 100 STON per article based on how us

🔥2310👍8👏2🥰1

30 Jun 2026, 12:28 UTC≈3,480 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔵 Stonbassadors, June is almost over! Thank you for being with us and continuing to explore everything STON.fi has to offer, both within the TON ecosystem and beyond it. ✔️ Don’t forget to submit all your work for the month by the end of the day (June 30, 11:59 PM in your time zone). ✔️ As you create content in July, we'd love to see more of your own experience with Omniston. Don't just describe the product, but e

36👍9🔥5👎3

20 Jun 2026, 07:46 UTC≈2,350 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🛠 A useful tool for creators making guides, shorts, and videos about STON.fi Some creators still rely on generic AI images with text pasted over a basic background, or record videos without showing the product they're talking about. ⛔ If that sounds familiar, here's a chance to level up your content. 1️⃣ Pick a topic for your post or video 2️⃣ Open the footage kit 3️⃣ Generate a short STONfi footage clip showing t

👍2215🔥10👏3

18 Jun 2026, 05:54 UTC≈5,450 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔵 Stonbassadors: May Digest Stonbassadors wrapped up the spring with strong results — hundreds of submissions, thousands of pieces of content, and millions of views. Let's take a closer look. May in numbers: ✔️ 10,400 STON (~$6,026) distributed ✔️ 511 stonbassadors rewarded ✔️ We hosted an X Contest and shared tips, updates, and early announcements in @stonfiambassadors ✔️ Personalized feedback emails will be sent

👍118🔥4

17 Jun 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,570 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔵 800 STON distributed for cross-chain testers Stonbassadors! When we needed to test our cross-chain solution before launch, you were the first people we turned to — and you delivered. The Cross-Chain Test has come to an end, and now we're ready to share the results. A total of 800 STON has been distributed among participants. The more transactions you made and the more routes you explored, the higher your reward.

🔥277👍5

15 Jun 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,680 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📡 Cross-Chain Live Stream goes live this Wednesday Stonbassadors, don't miss the chance to join our upcoming discussion on one of DeFi's biggest challenges: cross-chain UX. We'll talk about why cross-chain interactions still feel more complicated than they should, what users actually want, and where the industry is heading next. 🎁 Don't forget: every participant will be eligible for a special reward revealed only d

22👍8🖕1

13 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,800 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⏸ Cross-chain testing contest is now closed. Thank you to everyone who participated. Your activity, feedback, and swaps are helping us make STON.fi better, and that means a lot. We're now calculating rewards and will share the results within three business days. Stay tuned. 💙

🔥1913🤝2👍1

13 Jun 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,900 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔥 Cross-chain testing for stonbassadors with exclusive prizes Stonbassadors, here's your chance to participate in an exclusive test of cross-chain swaps before the public launch. To thank you for helping us stress-test the infrastructure, we're ready to reward every completed transaction with up to $10. 🎁 How to participate: • Open the beta version of the STON.fi app • Start making cross-chain swaps • Complete at

🔥15👍97

12 Jun 2026, 09:15 UTC≈1,510 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔵 Stonbassadors, it's time to test! Cross-chain swaps are now available in the beta version of the STON.fi app. 💙 If you haven't tried them yet, now is the perfect time. Every swap helps us test the infrastructure under real load and make sure everything is working as intended before the public launch. If a swap doesn't go through or you encounter any unexpected issues during the process, please send me a direct me

27👍13🔥4🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @stonfiambassadors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,540 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stonbassadors Program 🤝” (@stonfiambassadors), 6,133 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stonfiambassadors.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.