Channel
@stomdental_arkhiv_poleznoe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,970subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001848133329 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stomdental_arkhiv_poleznoe |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stomdental_arkhiv_poleznoe |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:02 | 1,970 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 1,968 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 1,970 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:13 | 1,964 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 1,963 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 1,962 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 1,961 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 1,962 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 1,959 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 1,957 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 4 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
127 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 58.3% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 20.5% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 15.7% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 5.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔵 Юридический обзор на визит Ревизорро с Еленой Летучей в стоматологическую клинику. Советы коллегам по общению с журналистами. Поблагодарить можно любой реакцией. ❤️🔥👍💯⭐️💥 Автор 👉 Владислав Аносов ✅ #SD_медправо
🔥7
При планировании любого лечения надо учитывать две группы факторов, которые я называю экстраоральные и интраоральные. Интраоральные - это все, что относится к клинике и здесь их уже подробно обсудили. Экстраоральные - это сопутствующие обстоятельства. Рассмотрим их: 1. Предыдущее лечение - серебрение и резорцин. Значит госка и учитывая обьем - удержание. Отсюда следует: - Договориться с ребенком с таким негативны…
💯7👍4
Подборка полезных стоматологических чатов в телеграм: Эти чаты для стоматологов ВСЕХ специальностей. Сюда можно добавить клинические случаи, обсудить, спросить совета, узнать информацию о наших Вебинарах!!! Всех ждём!!! Всем рады!!! Присоединяйтесь - с нами ОЧЕНЬ 💥 интересно!!! 1️⃣ ТЕРАПЕВТИЧЕСКАЯ СТОМАТОЛОГИЯ - https://t.me/stomdental_terapiya 2️⃣ ДЕТСКАЯ СТОМАТОЛОГИЯ - https://t.me/stomdental_detst…
https://bejure.ru/stati/sovmestitel-stomatologiya-oformlenie
Рекомендаци международной ассоциации дентальной травмы по диагностике и методам лечения травм зубов. Часть 3. Травмы зубов молочного прикуса¹
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11H3Y5ewJrilRR8OHehWgDOwQ-fksntwE/view?usp=drivesdk
EPOS™ - C-2189 https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2019/C-2189
Поняла мысль. Некая логика есть, но: 1. Нет четких доказательств того, что место соединения иглы с пластиком - единственная опасность (посчитать на уровне статистики это невозможно, потому что далеко не все аварии публикуют), существуют публикации, где указываются другие участки перелома игл. 2. Длинной иглой сложнее манипулировать во рту ребенка, выше риск травмы соседних областей и очень высок риск чрезмерного прод…
❤14
- Если в анамнезе уже были невынашивания, при решении о работе в зоне с анестетиками целесообразно обсудить ситуацию с врачом‑репродуктологом/акушером и врачом по охране труда, с учётом реальных измерений концентраций WAG в вашем учреждении.[8][4] Если опишете, в каких именно условиях вы работаете с севораном (тип отделения, есть ли отсос, как ощущается запах, сколько часов у наркозного аппарата), можно обсудить рис…
У герпеса первичный элемент поражения это пузырек, которые потом сливаются в эрозии, но все равно особенно на коже потом прослеживаются как отдельные элементы. Стрепто или стрептостафилодермия начинается с эрозии, ткань «плывет», быстро покрывается «соломенными корками» бактериальных фликтен, даже на слизистой фликтены будут желтоватые. Если прям совсем коротко - видишь пузырек - это герпес или ХРАС, если пузырек е…
❤26👍8
Как выявляют анкилоглоссию? Можно с помощью Бристольской системы оценки языка (BTAT) и протокола оценки уздечки языка у новорожденных и грудных детей (PLFASI), но это всё тоже субъективно и не учитывает новых анатомических данных… Самое простое и объективное – исходить из понимания того, что анкилоглоссия приводит к неподвижности языка, невозможности кормления, а значит страдает набор веса. Есть ли 100% абсолютные…
❤13
Уздечка языка у младенцев: состояние вопроса на день сегодняшний Кто определяет показания к хирургической коррекции? В равной степени и тот, кто направляет и тот, кто режет. Однако направляющий должен зафиксировать это в направлении с четким диагнозом. Почему сменилась парадигма «чик и всё» на «не всё так однозначно»? Всё дело в появлении новых анатомических и патофизиологических сведений о самой уздечке: 1. Уз…
👍6❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @stomdental_arkhiv_poleznoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АРХИВ - ПОЛЕЗНОЕ 🦷” (@stomdental_arkhiv_poleznoe), 1,970 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stomdental_arkhiv_poleznoe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.