Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Stom_Mamedov🦷

@stom_mamedofff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

57subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002345204932
TypeChannel
Username@stom_mamedofff
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/stom_mamedofff

Growth

577 August 2026 — 57 subscribers10 August 2026 — 57 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56–58 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:1657no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:0657first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 1 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
23
Videos
2
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

137 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53664751915452423383626.3%
custom 53685566701358364113021.9%
custom 53683914169741554502619.0%
custom 53684395850323808992014.6%
custom 5366493634134811763107.30%
custom 536842100929882537464.38%
custom 536852977934559627153.65%
custom 536869041971240142542.92%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2025 to 17 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2025, 11:42 UTC≈1,040 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

15.09.2025 Выходной Гуляли, ели клубнику, смотрели на воду 🤩

custom 536843958503238089910custom 53683914169741554507custom 53685297793455962714custom 53664751915452423382

10 Sept 2025, 23:14 UTC≈1,010 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Привет привет👋👋👋 Раз уж сказал какой щёткой нужно чистить зубы, поговорим и о зубной пасте, вот список моих рекомендаций. 1⃣Для чувствительных зубов: ➡️ R.O.C.S. SENSITIVE ➡️ SENSODYNE 2⃣Зубные пасты без фтора: ➡️ R.O.C.S. АКТИВНЫЙ КАЛЬЦИЙ ➡️ CORAPROX ENZYCAL ZERO 3⃣ Отбеливающая зубная паста: ➡️ OPALESCENCE 4⃣ Для тех кто пьёт много красного вина, кофе и курит сигареты (бросайте это губительное

custom 536647519154524233810custom 53685566701358364116custom 53683914169741554505

8 Sept 2025, 15:29 UTC731 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026

👋 Самый часто задаваемый вопрос стоматологу - «Какой пастой чистить зубы?»👎 Начну с того, что зубная паста это дополнительный предмет в чистки зубов, самое главное это зубная щётка и техника чистки – ЗАПОМНИТЕ! 😬 К сожалению, многие взрослые не умеют чистить зубы, это печально, сейчас мы это исправим! 📢 Я сам перепробовал много различных щёток, как мануальных, так и электрических и пришёл к одному результату - CURA

custom 536647519154524233810custom 53683914169741554507custom 53685566701358364115

4 Sept 2025, 19:31 UTC≈1,310 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👋Небольшой пост о часто встречающейся патологии в полости рта при утрате зубов 😶 Феномен Попова-Годона — патологическое смещение зубов после удаления их антагонистов. Происходит оно за счёт перестройки прикуса: зубы, утратив опору с противоположной стороны, постепенно «подымаются» из лунки и наклоняются, стараясь восстановить контакт 🤗, потому что наш организм "не любит" пустоты 😒 Причины и механизмы😞🏃‍♂️ • Удалён

custom 53685566701358364118custom 53684210092988253746custom 53686904197124014254custom 53664751915452423383custom 53664936341348117631custom 53685297793455962711

2 Sept 2025, 23:25 UTC459 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🐈‍⬛

custom 536647519154524233811custom 536843958503238089910custom 53664936341348117634custom 53683914169741554502

1 Sept 2025, 17:28 UTC453 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

01.09.2025 Выставка «О, море, море!» 🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊 СПб Русский музей. Корпус Бенуа. Очень красивые картины 💙💙💙

custom 536855667013583641111custom 53664936341348117635custom 53683914169741554505

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @stom_mamedofff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stom_Mamedov🦷” (@stom_mamedofff), 57 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stom_mamedofff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.