Channel
@stoic_ai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,842subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001424678591 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stoic_ai |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stoic_ai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 2,842 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 2,843 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 2,845 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 2,845 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
512 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 127 | 24.8% | |
| 🤩 | 96 | 18.8% | |
| 😁 | 72 | 14.1% | |
| ❤ | 60 | 11.7% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 9.96% | |
| 🥰 | 39 | 7.62% | |
| 👏 | 30 | 5.86% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 3.32% | |
| 🎉 | 16 | 3.13% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 512reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2022 to 8 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Soft wallets, or hot wallets, may not be as safe as expected. Solana ecosystem burdened by recent theft incident. ➡️Discover more in today's Pulse article.
🤩18🥰14😱10😁6
It's official... Polygon joins the Disney Accelerator Program this summer! Discover more in today's Pulse article
🤩18👍13😁13😱7
🎮✨ Investigate the crypto gaming universe in our latest blog post
👏16🥰12😁8👍7🤩5❤3
🔍 Let's dive into the diversity of crypto trading bots in our latest blog
❤16🤩8😁6👍3
Make this bear market an opportunity to grow your crypto portfolio. Explore Stoic AI
❤14🔥9👍7
"Cryptocurrency may not simply be the ultimate asset class of the 21st century, but the greatest asset class of all time." Discover more in our new article
🔥11👍6❤4
Fixed Income is an automated, market-neutral trading strategy providing steady APY in both bear and bull markets. Learn more about the new upcoming strategy and how to access it
👍11🥰7❤4🔥3
Even though the market is down, there is a bright light at the end of the tunnel. Discover more in today's new report from Stoic AI
😁8🤩6👍5
Could GameFi and carbon currencies reverse blockchain's climate stigma? Read our new review here
😁9👍4👏3🔥2❤1
The May prize fund of 913 334 CND was distributed to the top decentralized analysts who contributed their intelligence to the Cindicator Analytical Platform 🔥 The group of SuperForecasters divided 733 333 CND between themselves. To become a SuperForecaster, you just need to provide your predictions regarding Bitcoin’s min and max levels every Sunday from 00:00 to 15:00 UTC. Later this month we will launch a new con…
🔥10❤6👍4
The rising interest in the region from venture capital shows the potential to an influx of African crypto startups. Read more here
👍11🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stoic_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
In your opinion, will the Ethereum merge be delayed?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2022 to 8 July 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 864,541 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stoic AI” (@stoic_ai), 2,842 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stoic_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.