Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Stocks, Shares, Trading & Crypto

@stocks0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

80,483subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002817525941
TypeChannel
Username@stocks0
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stocks0

Growth

80,48380,49380,4887 August 2026 — 80,493 subscribers7 August 2026 — 80,493 subscribers8 August 2026 — 80,490 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80,491 subscribers10 August 2026 — 80,487 subscribers11 August 2026 — 80,488 subscribers12 August 2026 — 80,483 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80,482–80,495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:2780,483-5
11 Aug 2026, 22:1180,488+1
10 Aug 2026, 21:5180,487-4
9 Aug 2026, 19:5280,491+1
8 Aug 2026, 20:2180,490-3
7 Aug 2026, 16:3080,493no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:2480,493first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.36%
avg views ÷ 80,483 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,710
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held70 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total189,483
Reactions total3,042
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,042 reactions across 70 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔76725.2%
👍76225.0%
👏2448.02%
🎉1986.51%
😢1856.08%
😱1394.57%
👎1344.40%
🤯1073.52%
🔥742.43%
👨‍💻511.68%
❤‍🔥481.58%
💯461.51%
😐411.35%
🤨401.31%
🤬381.25%
👀220.723%
🤩210.69%
🥴190.625%
🤝160.526%
130.427%
14 further kinds772.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,042reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC≈1,750 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, one of Japan's leading banking institutions, plans to implement blockchain technology to facilitate instant settlements for select transactions involving Japanese government bonds.

👍17👏8🤔5🎉3💯21

12 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,810 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Iran calls on US Congress to investigate Trump and his family for alleged insider trading and stock market manipulation linked to the war.

🤬10🤔4😱2

12 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,750 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Elon Musk announced the release of Grok v4.6.

👏12👍5🎉2

12 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈2,030 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Trump faces lawsuit over expedited access to posts from Truth Social.

🤔11👎5💩2

12 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈2,260 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Hyperliquid prepares to launch its perpetual futures trading platform in the U.S. market.

👍19🔥11👏5🤔3

12 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈2,280 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026

US Consumer Price Index (July): - Month-over-month increase of 0.1%, in line with expectations and following a -0.4% decline in June. - Year-over-year growth of 3.4%, matching forecasts and down slightly from 3.5% in the previous month. Core CPI (Year-over-year): 2.5%, meeting expectations and decreasing from 2.6% previously.

👍24🤔12😐8👌3👏3

12 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,480 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Wintermute announces a $1 billion investment over the next five years to develop high-frequency trading (HFT) and artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, aiming to expand its footprint in traditional financial markets.

👍32👏13🤔8😁5🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC≈2,450 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Spot trading volume on centralized exchanges declines to two-year low.

🤔23👎12😢8😐2

12 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈2,550 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Fidelity Plans Staking Features and Quarterly Distributions for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) Fidelity is set to introduce staking capabilities and quarterly cash distributions for its Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH), one of the largest ETH ETFs in the United States. The move aims to enhance the fund’s offerings to investors and capitalize on the growing demand for Ethereum-related investment products. coindesk

👍23🔥13👏6😎3🤔1

12 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈2,510 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Fidelity Plans to Enhance Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) with Staking Features and Quarterly Distributions Fidelity is set to introduce staking capabilities and quarterly cash distributions for its Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH), one of the largest ETH ETFs in the United States. coindesk

👏27👍12🎉7🤯3🤔1

12 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC≈2,570 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

An Ethereum ICO participant has transferred all 2,680 ETH, valued at approximately $5.04 million, into new wallets after remaining inactive for over 11 years. The individual originally invested $831 during the ICO, acquiring 2,680 ETH, which has since appreciated to a valuation exceeding five million dollars, representing a return of approximately 6,068 times the initial investment.

🤯28🎉9👏6🔥3🤩1

12 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC≈2,630 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

An Ethereum ICO participant has transferred all 2,680 ETH, valued at approximately $5.04 million, into new wallets after remaining inactive for over 11 years. The original investment was $831 during the ICO, equating to a return of roughly 6,068 times the initial amount.

💯30🤯13🎉8👏5😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @stocks0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stocks, Shares, Trading & Crypto” (@stocks0), 80,483 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stocks0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.