Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for STINGER SPORT | Интернет-магазин | Разработка выхлопных систем

Channel

STINGER SPORT | Интернет-магазин | Разработка выхлопных систем

@stingersport163

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

533subscribers

+62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001757205557
TypeChannel
Username@stingersport163
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/stingersport163

Topic

Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4715335027 August 2026 — 471 subscribers8 August 2026 — 471 subscribers8 August 2026 — 472 subscribers16 August 2026 — 476 subscribers25 August 2026 — 473 subscribers1 September 2026 — 487 subscribers10 September 2026 — 502 subscribers19 September 2026 — 518 subscribers4 October 2026 — 533 subscribers7 August 20264 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 58 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 462–542 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 08:57533+15
19 Sept 2026, 16:15518+16
10 Sept 2026, 19:00502+15
1 Sept 2026, 14:47487+14
25 Aug 2026, 03:04473-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:04476+4
8 Aug 2026, 07:04472+1
8 Aug 2026, 04:46471no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:13471first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 58s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1227.3%
🔥1227.3%
👍920.5%
🤝36.82%
😁24.55%
❤‍🔥12.27%
🍓12.27%
😇12.27%
😈12.27%
😭12.27%
🫡12.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC184 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Докидываем производственных новостей (новости по тюнингу тоже будут, постараемся адаптировать формат под широкий круг). Как некоторые уже знают, мы готовимся к запуску линейки S1 Team. Прекрасное занятие, заставило перелопатить почти всё. Самое сложное - ресиверы, и мы только сейчас, по сути, подошли к финишному этапу. Дудки. Просчитанные дудки оказалось невозможно сделать на нашем оборудовании, поэтому сначала пришл…

👍3🔥2

18 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC189 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

То, что тут ещё есть актив, уже удивительный факт на фоне замедлений. Но значит так, попробуем делать в таком формате

🤝2

16 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTC239 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Добавляем обзоры тюнинга в целом?

  1. Во, вот общий обзор тюнячек в кассу, хоть больше узнавать получиться94%
  2. Какая-то странная история, наверное нет0%
  3. Я тут вообще по приколу6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁1

16 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC230 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Так, господа. Так получилось, что доросли мы до того, когда можно пихать горизонтальный формат видео. Жесть, как это было весело, но вполне осуществимо. Понятное дело, что такой формат обещает большее количество новостей и подробностей, но есть идея о экспериментальной теме. Мы тут вообще эксперименты любим. Так сложилось, что особо новости в сфере автотюнинга у нас никто не обозревает и не распространяет, это отдае…

🔥2

1 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC322 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну и отзыв на выхлоп для форда. Человеку по итогу оставили паук 4-2-1, резонатор и раздвойку серии Mute. Форд двухлитровый. От нас товарищ возвращался из. Тольятти аж в Новокуйбышевск, так что испытание по громкости на дальняк считаю пройденным🤌

❤‍🔥1😇1

1 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC269 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну и техническая часть, все-таки изначально телеграм был под нее, и осветим действия ребят-конкурентов. Раздвойка для Ford Focus 2. Слева наш глушитель, справа производства Stexx, про название сами обсудите. Почему у нас разнодлинно, а у них равнодлинно с разводкой под нишей запаски? Мы рассматривали второй вариант, и серьезно собирались делать именно его, пока не вспомнили, что вообще-то машины ездят по разным дорог…

❤1🤝1

1 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC245 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

И сразу кто-то отписался

🍓1😈1

1 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC255 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну, самые избранные. Ребят, готовлю инст, честно, не хватает времени на полноценную публикацию нового контента, а перезаливать ролики не шибко хочется. Плюс у нас тут небольшой хипиш в связи с получением одной важной, окончательной бумажки, и готовим иски. Ребята, которые нас подделывают, я знаю, что вы это читаете. Готовьтесь❤️

👍2🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 11:29 UTC329 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

В нельзяграмм такое не стоит. Немного приколов, чисто рабочих. Как многие знают, мы занимаемся машинами. И порой к нам привозят самую разнообразную аппаратуру. Сейчас на подъемнике висит форд фокус, и у него пришли быстросъёмы при первом запуске. Автомобиль стоял несколько дней без движения, со вторника не заводили двигатель. И шланги, вполне видно, уже уставшие. И вот такие приколы у нас случаются на многих машинах)…

❤1🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 10:03 UTC314 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

На самом деле делать субару пауки сложно. Все из-за этого бублика, который жрёт очень много пространства, и разместить его - отдельная задача. Да еще и абы как нельзя, слишком короткий бублик просто не будет работать. Но, тем не менее, на форде с его не самым большим пространством в туннеле это получилось, и тестовый вариант сейчас ставится на автомобиль

🔥2

8 Jun 2026, 08:59 UTC469 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Весьма неплохой звук для восьмиклопа на ниве, верно?)

❤5👍2🔥2

20 May 2026, 16:22 UTC607 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Все видели в нельзяграмме (кто подписан) то, что сделан выхлоп на Рено Дастер, и честно вышло прикольно) На Чери Тигго такой же звук вообще не вписывался, брутальность с китайским кроссовером не вязалась, пусть видос и залетел. А вот Дастеру такой звук пришелся на удивление в тему. Что сделано? Два коллектора, 4-1, и собственно разнодлинник, он же субару, продолжаем набивать руку в деле производства сложных коллектор…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @stingersport163. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Добавляем обзоры тюнинга в целом?

  1. Во, вот общий обзор тюнячек в кассу, хоть больше узнавать получиться94%
  2. Какая-то странная история, наверное нет0%
  3. Я тут вообще по приколу6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“STINGER SPORT | Интернет-магазин | Разработка выхлопных систем” (@stingersport163), 533 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stingersport163.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.