Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for STIMA | Value Standard

Channel

STIMA | Value Standard

@stima_io

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

37subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001650939400
TypeChannel
Username@stima_io
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 23 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/stima_io

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3739387 August 2026 — 38 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38 subscribers14 August 2026 — 39 subscribers7 September 2026 — 38 subscribers15 September 2026 — 37 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 19:0037-1
7 Sept 2026, 17:4238-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:2339+1
10 Aug 2026, 21:0138no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:3638first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1684.2%
❤315.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2022 to 31 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2023, 11:05 UTC749 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Dear community, some users and channels are impersonating STIMA, be careful, we are not implementing any AIRDROP. We ask you to be careful and not share sensitive information. ❗️For more information on STIMA refer to the the official website: www.stima.io STIMA TEAM

❤3

14 Aug 2023, 16:58 UTC656 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

STIMA is developing an app that will allow anyone to have a real-time valuation of their assets and access to Cross Property Sharing and Value Standard services. We are trying to make the blockchain world easier and more accessible. If you want to become a tester DM to @STIMAteam

23 Apr 2023, 02:55 UTC333 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

OFFICIAL MONETARY POLICY ANNOUNCEMENT STIMA is implementing a monetary policy dedicated to increasing the liquidity pool by containing the quote price at $1 (+/- 2 %). The objective of this policy is to stimulate the accumulation of liquidity on the markets, to stimulate asset certification. This monetary policy is foreseen for the next two months.

22 Apr 2023, 17:59 UTC190 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Dear community, some users and channels are impersonating STIMA, be careful, we are not implementing any AIRDROP. We ask you to be careful and not share sensitive information. ❗️For more information on STIMA refer to the the official website: www.stima.io STIMA TEAM

👍2

5 Nov 2022, 06:38 UTC327 viewsread 10 August 2026

Overall non farm payrolls disappointed, although it was a mixed bag payrolls were revised up by 60k jobs for last month and missed on the upside by about 60k for this reading. The only silver lining, in a bad news is good news environment, was that the unemployment ticked up from 3.5% to 3.7%. Anyhow one would have expected a market meltdown instead we rallied. Is this an early sign that much of the bad news has been…

4 Nov 2022, 05:11 UTC311 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

First significant piece of the macro puzzle is out today, non farm payrolls, key in determining the December policy stance of the Fed. The labor market needs to cool down significantly for the Fed to even consider a pause in rate hikes.

👍1

3 Nov 2022, 03:11 UTC260 viewsread 10 August 2026

Meltdown in equities following a fairly disastrous FOMC meeting where Chair Powell sounded as hawkish as ever. The positive news that after all the dust has settled BTC is just a touch lower in the last 24 hours. Crypto is proving resilience against all odds.

26 Oct 2022, 18:41 UTC207 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

The decoupling of crypto from legacy tech is continuing. There couldn’t be a more positive single piece of news than this one. FTX saw a record number of short positions being liquidated yesterday.

👍1

25 Oct 2022, 23:26 UTC188 viewsread 10 August 2026

Today we have seen crypto ripping higher leaving equities in its wake. In after hours after Google’s and Microsoft’s poor Q3 results causing a 6% drop in both and the Nasdaq being well below -2% in pre-market, BTC has hardly moved. We have been saying this for weeks crypto seems to be finally decoupling from equities, and this is great news for the space!

18 Oct 2022, 12:59 UTC180 viewsread 10 August 2026

Interesting stat, since the 1960’s EVERY single year after a mid-term election has been a green year, with mid-terms scheduled in November 8th we might be not that far from a market bottom…we remain constructive in crypto that is showing signs of decoupling from equities.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stima_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“STIMA | Value Standard” (@stima_io), 37 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stima_io.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.