Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пошлые Стикеры Аниме

Channel

Пошлые Стикеры Аниме

@stikery1_18

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

17,878subscribers

+5,819 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001808363450
TypeChannel
Username@stikery1_18
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stikery1_18

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

19,700 average views per post against 17,878 subscribers — an engagement rate of 110.2%. Across the 23,718 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.44% and 21.5%, with a median of 11.0%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (12 August 2026 11 September 2026)
Posts measured59 of 59 published in the window (0 exact, 59 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,162,180
Mature posts only110.2% over 59 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers17,878 measured 9 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 23,718 channels · p10 2.79% · p25 5.44% · p50 11.0% · p75 21.5% · p90 38.5%
Position in cohort99.612th percentile · 10.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.162% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 11 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,05917,87814,968.512 August 2026 — 12,059 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,155 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,358 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,699 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,003 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,147 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,467 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,757 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,014 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,375 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,759 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,110 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,339 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,526 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,594 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,809 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,107 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,202 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,261 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,443 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,822 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,250 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,878 subscribers12 August 20269 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 28 days, net +5,819. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,186–18,751 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 11:4117,878+628
6 Sept 2026, 02:5617,250+428
4 Sept 2026, 00:3516,822+379
2 Sept 2026, 11:5416,443+182
1 Sept 2026, 12:4516,261+59
31 Aug 2026, 12:5816,202+95
30 Aug 2026, 15:2416,107+298
29 Aug 2026, 15:1715,809+215
28 Aug 2026, 16:1315,594+68
27 Aug 2026, 17:4415,526+187
26 Aug 2026, 18:3315,339+229
25 Aug 2026, 15:1815,110+351
24 Aug 2026, 12:0314,759+384
22 Aug 2026, 18:3814,375+361
21 Aug 2026, 10:1814,014+257
20 Aug 2026, 11:1213,757+290
19 Aug 2026, 10:1413,467+320
18 Aug 2026, 09:1413,147+144
17 Aug 2026, 10:3613,003+304
15 Aug 2026, 16:5612,699first reading

Engagement

79 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
110.2%
avg views ÷ 17,878 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,700
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.314%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 79 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held79 (7 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total1,162,180
Reactions total3,648
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,590 reactions across 79 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52175365833972898341,48132.3%
custom 527614395477184474860213.1%
custom 522218461847988916157612.5%
custom 527182044741819592551811.3%
custom 527372685884683822651611.2%
3708.06%
custom 54336754653342075042776.03%
custom 5397859960686129032982.14%
custom 5267031043487051884891.94%
🔥180.392%
🌭100.218%
❤‍🔥90.196%
🍓60.131%
👍60.131%
💋50.109%
😍50.109%
😈20.044%
😎20.044%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,590 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 79 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stikery1_18. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 79 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈8,190 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🤍🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🤍 🤍🩶🤍 ⬇️Закрытый канал⬇️ 🍑 https://t.me/+74QmTA_mjNU4OWMy 🍑 🍑 https://t.me/+74QmTA_mjNU4OWMy 🍑 🍑 https://t.me/+74QmTA_mjNU4OWMy 🍑

custom 522218461847988916131custom 527182044741819592519custom 527372685884683822610custom 527614395477184474865

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈8,060 views63 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 522218461847988916129custom 527182044741819592517custom 52737268588468382269custom 527614395477184474871

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈8,090 views52 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🙄 Те самые стикеры 🔞 #НАЖМИ #НА #СТИКЕР 🙂 Буст очень поможет продвижению 🙂

custom 522218461847988916122custom 527182044741819592514custom 52737268588468382268custom 527614395477184474853

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈7,850 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 522218461847988916122custom 52718204474181959259custom 52737268588468382269custom 527614395477184474862

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈7,990 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 522218461847988916123custom 527372685884683822610custom 52718204474181959257custom 527614395477184474852❤‍🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈7,970 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🙄Аниме "Я единственный парень в классе?!"🔞 #аниме #девушки #stickers 🙂Буст очень поможет продвижению🙂

custom 522218461847988916122custom 52718204474181959258custom 52761439547718447487custom 527372685884683822653

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈7,800 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 522218461847988916122custom 527182044741819592510custom 52737268588468382267custom 52761439547718447482

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈7,770 views39 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🙄 Романтические те самые стикеры 🔞 #парочки #стикеры #стикер 🙂 Буст очень поможет продвижению 🙂

custom 522218461847988916120custom 52718204474181959257custom 52737268588468382267custom 52761439547718447485

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈7,650 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 522218461847988916123custom 52718204474181959258custom 52737268588468382268custom 527614395477184474832

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈7,710 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 522218461847988916121custom 527182044741819592513custom 527372685884683822684custom 52761439547718447484

28 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈20,300 views132 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Скинь стикеры кентам 😉

custom 522218461847988916161custom 527372685884683822634custom 5271820447418195925289

28 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈19,800 views132 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 522218461847988916144custom 527182044741819592539custom 527372685884683822632custom 527614395477184474896👍1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @stikery1_18. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@stikery1_18 edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пошлые Стикеры Аниме” (@stikery1_18), 17,878 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stikery1_18.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.