Channel
@stickers_tools
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,619subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002645603424 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stickers_tools |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stickers_tools |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 1,619 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 1,624 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 1,629 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 1,629 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 23 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
317 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 127 | 40.1% | |
| 🔥 | 123 | 38.8% | |
| 👍 | 57 | 18.0% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 2.52% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.631% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2025 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stickers_tools. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 August 2025 to 30 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Minor Update Trading on Sticker Pad — buy & sell more than 8 packs in a single signed transaction (tip: set up v5 wallet to send more than 4) — quantity field is now editable — type an exact amount, use +/− or quick presets, preview avg price — «spend X TON» calculator — enter a budget, get the max packs it buys — view your both Realized and Unrealized PNL Experimental: Pack Chat — Live chat on every pack p…
❤4
Sticker Pad Update Launching Tab stickers.tools just gained a new tab — track every sticker from Sticker Pad on its bonding curve and TRADE them without leaving the dashboard. Live Feed — every trade and new packs appears real-time — no delay — filter by progress, volume, age or market cap Per-pack analytics — price chart, bonding progress, holder distribution — 24h pressure (buys vs sells), live trades fee…
❤6
API Changes, Market Digests and more API V1 & Swagger API was rebuilt. All endpoints are now under /api/v1/ path fully documented on Swagger at stickers.tools/api Should be better and predictable for your projects and friendly for Agents. Old endpoints are kept for backward compatibility. Market Digests Page View top movers, gainers, losers for selected period(4h, 24h, 7d or custom in the past) Accessible from…
👍6❤5🔥4👎2
Personal Year Recap added Year Recap of your activity open page: t.me/stickers_tools_bot?startapp=yearreview Wish you a Happy New Year! p.s. there could be some issues – just wait or try again later, sorry for that😭
❤10👍6
Goodies Update Goodies data is now line on stickers.tools — added issuer filter: select Sticker Pack, Goodies or both — explore all the stats in a familiar format — track your portfolio and historical performance Fixes and improvements — added TON Connect for better on-chain sync — significantly improved real-time floor price logic — prices are now more accurate and update more frequently — tons of UI/U…
🔥9👎4🤨2❤1
🖼new sticker sale record one sticker - Gold Bone #5 - for $25,000 stickers.tools | @stickers_tools_bot 🖼новая рекордная продажа стикера один стикер - Gold Bone #5 за 25 тысяч долларов
🔥14❤9👎2👍1
Channel name was changed to «Stickers Tools News»
$10m in secondary trading volume on verified markets – huge milestone stickers.tools/totals btw fees and royalties are not included in the volume
🔥33❤14👍8
More than a month passed since the last digest, here's what's happened during last 30 days: 📈 Market Overview Volume USD: $1,627,691.23 +8.37% Volume TON: 512,856.77 +14.27% Trades: 41594 🔥 Top Volume Leaders 1. Error #1 $207,382.01 | 2423 trades 2. Tyler Mode: On $92,152.87 | 153 trades 3. Bored Ape Originals $91,996.18 | 521 trades 4. Tyler Gold Edition $79,971.92 | 51 trades 5. Cool Blue Pengu $73…
🔥20❤16👍12
@pixelmarket is now supported track trades history and volumes and compare floors between markets @pixelmarket теперь поддерживается следите за историей продаж и объёмами и сравнивайте флоры между маркетами
🔥20👍12❤11
@stickers_tools_bot will soon have trading features, letting users create buy orders and sweep the floor for stickers across all markets in one place. Clip on X
❤33🔥9👍5
last 8 hours digest market blown up after mint announcement Volume USD: $67,929.36 +1747.48% Volume TON: 20,141.1 +1745.07% 🔥 Top Volume Leaders 1. Not Cap $7,888.96 | 7 trades 2. Cool Blue Pengu $7,721.26 | 17 trades 3. Pengu Valentines $4,758.9 | 47 trades 4. Blue Pengu $4,601.46 | 25 trades 5. Bored Ape Originals $4,413.74 | 23 trades 💰 Top Sales 1. Not Cap #557 $1,132.19 (334.78 TON) 2. Not …
🔥9👍6❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @stickers_tools. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 355,198 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stickers Tools News” (@stickers_tools), 1,619 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stickers_tools.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.