Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stickers Pack

Channel

Stickers Pack

@sticker_pack_channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,803subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001209820566
TypeChannel
Username@sticker_pack_channel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sticker_pack_channel

Growth

1,8031,8091,8067 August 2026 — 1,807 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,806 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,809 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,803 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,802–1,810 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:371,803-6
10 Aug 2026, 21:481,809+3
8 Aug 2026, 00:151,806-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:461,807first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2024, 16:33 UTC≈18,600 viewsread 7 August 2026

𝗚ʜᴏ𝘀ᴛ 𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗸 👻 𝗔ᴅᴅ 𝟭𝟬𝟰 𝗦ᴛɪᴄᴋᴇʀ𝘀 @Stickers_collection_bot

Signed 𝚂𝚑𝚊𝚑𝚜

3 Jul 2024, 16:33 UTC≈18,600 viewsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝚂𝚑𝚊𝚑𝚜

3 Jul 2024, 16:08 UTC≈18,500 viewsread 7 August 2026

Game of thrones Add 67 Stickers @Stickers_collection_bot

Signed 𝚂𝚑𝚊𝚑𝚜

3 Jul 2024, 16:08 UTC≈18,300 viewsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝚂𝚑𝚊𝚑𝚜

16 Jun 2024, 09:12 UTC≈18,600 viewsread 7 August 2026

ᴄᴏᴜᴩʟᴇ ʜᴜɢ ᴩᴀᴄᴋ 👩‍❤️‍👨 ᴀᴅᴅ 53 ꜱᴛɪᴄᴋᴇʀꜱ @Stickers_collection_bot

Signed 𝚂𝚑𝚊𝚑𝚜

16 Jun 2024, 09:12 UTC≈18,200 viewsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝚂𝚑𝚊𝚑𝚜

16 Jun 2024, 05:20 UTC≈16,900 viewsread 7 August 2026

ᴡᴡᴇ ᴩᴀᴄᴋ👊 ᴀᴅᴅ ᴩᴀᴄᴋɪɴɢ 50 ꜱᴛɪᴄᴋᴇʀꜱ @Stickers_collection_bot

Signed 𝚂𝚑𝚊𝚑𝚜

16 Jun 2024, 05:20 UTC≈16,700 viewsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝚂𝚑𝚊𝚑𝚜

14 Jun 2024, 13:55 UTC≈16,200 viewsread 7 August 2026

Cᴜᴛᴇ ɢɪʀʟ 𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐤 😀 𝐀𝐝𝐝 𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 50 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐫𝐬 @Stickers_collection_bot

Signed 🇸 🇭 🇦 🇭 🇸

14 Jun 2024, 13:55 UTC≈16,200 viewsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 🇸 🇭 🇦 🇭 🇸

14 Jun 2024, 13:37 UTC≈15,600 viewsread 7 August 2026

Cᴜᴛᴇ ᴄᴀᴛ 𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐤 🐈‍⬛ 𝐀𝐝𝐝 𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 50 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐫𝐬 @Stickers_collection_bot

Signed 🇸 🇭 🇦 🇭 🇸

14 Jun 2024, 13:37 UTC≈15,500 viewsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 🇸 🇭 🇦 🇭 🇸

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sticker_pack_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 248,330 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stickers Pack” (@sticker_pack_channel), 1,803 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sticker_pack_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.