Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GIFTxTON

@stickXgift

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,341subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002311056628
TypeChannel
Username@stickXgift
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stickXgift

Growth

4,3414,3614,3518 August 2026 — 4,361 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,355 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,341 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,338–4,364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:484,341-14
9 Aug 2026, 01:214,355-6
8 Aug 2026, 06:034,361first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

274 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁8430.7%
👍4817.5%
4717.2%
🔥2910.6%
🤯228.03%
💯134.74%
👎72.55%
🐳62.19%
😍41.46%
🤔41.46%
🤣41.46%
custom 529443033638033045331.09%
31.09%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 274reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 17 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stickXgift. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 January 2026 to 17 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Apr 2026, 11:00 UTC385 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Может тоже начать посты каждый день выкладывать?

😁5🤣4

17 Feb 2026, 08:55 UTC699 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С первого апреля вам уже не надо будет переключать впн туда-сюда. Терпеть можете держать его всегда включённым. РКН заботится о нашем удобстве ❤️

😁84

14 Feb 2026, 22:23 UTC623 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

😏Это все хорошо, а где обещанное казино, которое встроено в телеграмм? Лудить календариками уже скучно, дайте дайсы уже 🎰

😁9

12 Feb 2026, 18:21 UTC591 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

😲Интересное 🗓Adult Tasks (~90🔒) - 11 🗓Investor (~31🔒) - 31 🗓Pepe Plans (~41🔒) - 18 🎁Radar (~115🔒) - 2 🎁Star Prize (~46🔒) - 9 🎁Yule Bells (~45🔒) - 16 (один из них на черном фоне) Столько сожгли подарков этих моделей. Интересно, о чем думают люди, которые добавляют их в крафт?

🔥7🤯5

10 Feb 2026, 20:43 UTC663 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Следующий никнейм его сынишки ⌨️ KodakRuso предлагает вам 1800 TON(~2700 руб.)

😁84

10 Feb 2026, 20:40 UTC610 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если вы ещё не видели, то можете почитать перед сном про сынишку нашего Павлика. @scamdurovson Если коротко: Молодой бизнесмен решил заработать на своём родственнике, тем самым в качестве доказательства, что скама не будет, он отправлял кружочки с Дуровым, с которым был также замечен на турнире UFC. Подарок от Дурова в профиле также подтверждает их связь. По итогу: кепки возвращены, метка скамера - выдана. Наверн

🤯7🤔1

9 Feb 2026, 13:15 UTC456 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Странно, что уже сутки прошли после выхода крафтов, и до сих пор нет ни одной новости по типу: Какие-то школьники из 8Б класса под ОС Windows 8.1 с VPN Ирландии, 8 раз нажав «Конфиденциальность», 3 раза кнопку громкости, после чего зажать «Крафт» на 18 секунд, подпрыгнуть, ну и добавить 1 календарь, в результате чего выдается новый скрафченный календарь, ну а старый, естественно, летит на маркет и продается

😁10

7 Feb 2026, 20:32 UTC476 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Потом плакать будут все, что крафты не дали иксов, а конечно не дадут Их уже откупили, а те колокольчики, которые покупают обычные юзеры - это уже перебор цены. Я очень сильно удивлюсь, если 4 колокольчика блэк фона выдадут супер-мега-ультра крутой колокольчик на блэк фоне и вы его продадите за 400+ тон. (Если только он не с рыбкой)

3

7 Feb 2026, 20:14 UTC544 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уже противно от всего говна, что происходит в теме подарков. Это было всегда, но каждый раз все хуже и хуже. Что за бред, объясните мне, когда приближенные люди скупают что-то, а потом уже дают инсайды, а те в свою очередь флипают в пару иксов на обычных юзерах. Это здравая тема? Или что вся основная информация выходит в скам чате, где бреют всеми способами людей. Это здравая тема? И даже если вы решитесь просто жд

19👍14💯13

5 Feb 2026, 17:12 UTC440 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тут есть кто разбирается в крипте? Подскажите, когда крафты?

😁11🤔3

2 Feb 2026, 23:36 UTC571 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁14🐳3

2 Feb 2026, 22:39 UTC671 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🛒На getgems сегодня акция - все по 33 Булат решил расстаться со своей коллекцией, выложив 10к 🎁 на рынок Можете поискать красивые номера или же подобрать что-то уникальное😄

🤯10👍4🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @stickXgift. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 467,092 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GIFTxTON” (@stickXgift), 4,341 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stickXgift.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.