Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Art of Steven Sharkey

@stevensharkeyart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

66subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001782447720
TypeChannel
Username@stevensharkeyart
DescriptionArt of Steven Sharkey
Created1 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/stevensharkeyart

Growth

667 August 2026 — 66 subscribers10 August 2026 — 66 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:1566no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:0066first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 11 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6660.6%
🤔1311.9%
👍98.26%
🔥98.26%
❤‍🔥65.50%
👎32.75%
🤬21.83%
🎉10.917%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2022 to 15 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2023, 19:54 UTC352 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥9👍2

Signed Steven Sharkey

3 Aug 2023, 23:45 UTC377 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

❤️😳

❤‍🔥6

Signed Steven Sharkey

27 May 2023, 14:59 UTC585 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Does Doog like pistachios?🤨

🤔13👍2👎2

Signed Steven Sharkey

5 Nov 2022, 05:05 UTC694 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Hey, long time no post.

19🎉1👍1👎1

7 Oct 2022, 23:55 UTC305 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @groypergalleryPhoto

Matthew 10:16 Behold I send you as sheep in the midst of wolves. Be ye therefore wise as serpents and simple as doves. Nick Fuentes and the Groypers love you, Sneako! 𝕂𝔼𝔼ℙ 𝕌ℙ 𝕋ℍ𝔼 𝔾𝕆𝕆𝔻 𝔽𝕀𝔾ℍ𝕋. 𝕎𝔼'𝕍𝔼 𝔾𝕆𝕋 𝕐𝕆𝕌ℝ 𝔹𝔸ℂ𝕂. Full artist credits at Studio Groypli📢

6

13 May 2022, 08:12 UTC≈2,370 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Thank you for the stream tonight. See you in a few weeks ;_;

6

11 May 2022, 06:29 UTC415 viewsread 10 August 2026

Don't have a ton of time right now for fan art. Had to pump this idea out tonight though. Thought it was funny :D

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @stevensharkeyart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Art of Steven Sharkey” (@stevensharkeyart), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stevensharkeyart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.