follow my girl @kimiyoonn!
β€26π11β€βπ₯6

Channel
@stellaxwilson
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
2,373subscribers
-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002040270420 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stellaxwilson |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stellaxwilson |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 2,373 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 2,382 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 2,381 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 2,392 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 2,405 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 2,413 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 2,425 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 2,432 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 2,433 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 2,433 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 October 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
538 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 220 | 40.9% | |
| π | 118 | 21.9% | |
| π₯ | 68 | 12.6% | |
| π | 55 | 10.2% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 54 | 10.0% | |
| π | 5 | 0.929% | |
| π€© | 5 | 0.929% | |
| π | 4 | 0.743% | |
| π | 4 | 0.743% | |
| π | 2 | 0.372% | |
| π₯° | 2 | 0.372% | |
| π | 1 | 0.186% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 538 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2025 to 30 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
follow my girl @kimiyoonn!
β€26π11β€βπ₯6
If we lock eyes, itβs over for you β¨π find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
β€27π₯13π5π€©4π3β€βπ₯1
Donβt blame me if you fall for the vibe β¨π find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
β€24π₯7β€βπ₯4π4π3π1
Just here to make your heart skip a beat β¨π find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
β€22π8π₯7β€βπ₯2
My favorite part π«Άπ»β¨ find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
β€14π6π₯3π3β€βπ₯2π1
Hit me up before this year ends π«Άπ»β¨ find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
π8π6β€4π3β€βπ₯1π₯1π€©1
Can u explain my π and π? π π find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
β€12π5π₯5β€βπ₯4π2
You find me attractive? β¨π find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
β€8π6π4π₯4β€βπ₯3π₯°2π1
Bad boys get special attention ππ find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
β€14π7π₯4β€βπ₯2
I only arrest the ones who flirt back πβ¨ find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
π9β€8π6β€βπ₯3
Youβve got the right to remain mine ππ find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
π₯6π5β€βπ₯4β€3π2
Tell me why Iβm smiling like this ππ find all my other socials here: beacons.ai/stellawilsonn
β€8π5π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stellaxwilson. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βstella wilson π³οΈββ§οΈβ€οΈβ (@stellaxwilson), 2,373 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stellaxwilson.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.