Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Coin Bot | Public

Channel

Coin Bot | Public

@stellar_bot_public

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Cite this entry

299,642subscribers

+36,899 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003267950853
TypeChannel
Username@stellar_bot_public
DescriptionCoin Bot Your all-in-one assistant for accumulating and earning cryptocurrency.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stellar_bot_public

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

262,743299,642281,192.57 August 2026 — 262,743 subscribers7 August 2026 — 262,743 subscribers7 August 2026 — 262,780 subscribers8 August 2026 — 263,889 subscribers9 August 2026 — 265,309 subscribers10 August 2026 — 266,231 subscribers11 August 2026 — 267,153 subscribers13 August 2026 — 268,358 subscribers14 August 2026 — 270,090 subscribers16 August 2026 — 272,134 subscribers17 August 2026 — 272,739 subscribers18 August 2026 — 273,515 subscribers19 August 2026 — 274,628 subscribers20 August 2026 — 277,368 subscribers22 August 2026 — 279,217 subscribers23 August 2026 — 280,726 subscribers24 August 2026 — 281,425 subscribers25 August 2026 — 282,087 subscribers26 August 2026 — 282,925 subscribers27 August 2026 — 283,810 subscribers29 August 2026 — 284,769 subscribers29 August 2026 — 285,089 subscribers30 August 2026 — 285,173 subscribers31 August 2026 — 285,563 subscribers1 September 2026 — 286,561 subscribers2 September 2026 — 287,258 subscribers4 September 2026 — 287,363 subscribers6 September 2026 — 288,283 subscribers10 September 2026 — 289,603 subscribers12 September 2026 — 290,044 subscribers14 September 2026 — 291,011 subscribers15 September 2026 — 292,409 subscribers17 September 2026 — 293,956 subscribers27 September 2026 — 299,642 subscribers7 August 202627 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +36,899. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 257,208–305,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 02:57299,642+5,686
17 Sept 2026, 15:02293,956+1,547
15 Sept 2026, 16:19292,409+1,398
14 Sept 2026, 00:36291,011+967
12 Sept 2026, 06:39290,044+441
10 Sept 2026, 02:40289,603+1,320
6 Sept 2026, 17:56288,283+920
4 Sept 2026, 07:15287,363+105
2 Sept 2026, 20:34287,258+697
1 Sept 2026, 19:49286,561+998
31 Aug 2026, 21:25285,563+390
30 Aug 2026, 23:17285,173+84
29 Aug 2026, 21:07285,089+320
29 Aug 2026, 00:24284,769+959
27 Aug 2026, 21:34283,810+885
26 Aug 2026, 21:48282,925+838
25 Aug 2026, 23:47282,087+662
24 Aug 2026, 23:35281,425+699
23 Aug 2026, 12:12280,726+1,509
22 Aug 2026, 00:24279,217first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 299,642 subscribers
Avg views / post
58,600
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held28 (25 March 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total234,400
Reactions total5,286
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 08:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
47

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

49,397 reactions across 28 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤27,47555.6%
👍11,74823.8%
🔥3,1796.44%
🎉1,6533.35%
💯1,2112.45%
🤩1,1812.39%
❤‍🔥1,1522.33%
🏆1,0762.18%
⚡7221.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49,397 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
358
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 28 we hold a reading for · 96%
Most on one post
107
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stellar_bot_public. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 20:45 UTC≈26,900 views886 reactions2 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

THE 233x ANOMALY: WHY YOUR $150 HAS AN ADVANTAGE OVER WALL STREET WHALES IN 2026 (AND HOW IT GENERATES $35,000) In venture capital, a 1-to-10 return is considered an outstanding result. But what is happening right now in the algorithmic AI trading sector completely breaks classic financial models. We are witnessing the mass confirmation of the so-called "233x anomaly"—a process where a micro-deposit of $150 turns in…

❤541👍159❤‍🔥79🔥65🎉19🏆12🤩11

17 Sept 2026, 18:43 UTC≈54,200 views1,442 reactions4 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

THE END OF THE "BUY AND HOLD" ERA: WHY CAPITAL VELOCITY MATTERS MORE THAN CAPITAL SIZE IN 2026 (AND WHAT $150 HAS TO DO WITH IT) If you are still trying to build a classic investment portfolio and waiting for conservative returns in 5–10 years, it's time to rethink your strategy. In 2026, the old rules of Wall Street are completely obsolete. A completely different metric has entered the arena: capital velocity. And …

❤848👍318🔥119💯45🎉33⚡24🤩23❤‍🔥18

10 Sept 2026, 18:15 UTC≈72,700 views1,459 reactions6 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

LIFE ON "EASY MODE": HOW AI ALGORITHMS TURNED $150 INTO A $35,000/MONTH DIGITAL CHEAT CODE IN 2026 Have you noticed that in 2026, a whole new category of people has emerged who seem to have activated "Easy Mode" in life? They control their time freely, focus on their own interests, travel a lot, and watch their bank accounts grow at an abnormal rate. The secret here isn't insider information, complex financial stra…

❤842👍348🔥127🤩41❤‍🔥26🎉26💯25⚡24

3 Sept 2026, 16:15 UTC≈80,600 views1,499 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

THE NEW FINANCIAL ASYMMETRY: WHY EFFORT NO LONGER EQUALS MONEY IN 2026 (AND HOW $150 SCALES TO $35,000) We have officially entered an era where the amount of time spent and coffee consumed no longer has any bearing on the size of your bank account. In 2026, the main illusion of the past—"the harder you work, the more you get"—has completely collapsed, giving way to the era of algorithmic leverage. While millions of…

❤875👍354🔥103🤩51🏆36🎉23💯23⚡18

29 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈81,300 views1,394 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

THE 2026 GOLD RUSH: HOW $150 ON AUTOPILOT TURNS INTO $35,000 (AND WHY YOU CAN'T AFFORD TO MISS THIS TREND) 2026 has already gone down in history as the point of no return. Right now, the most aggressive and profitable financial trend of the decade is unfolding: a mass transition to autonomous AI trading. Before our eyes, the rules of wealth creation are being rewritten, and those who realized this first are grabbing…

❤751👍309🔥115🎉49💯38🤩34❤‍🔥33🏆33

23 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC≈89,800 views1,794 reactions7 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

SYSTEM GLITCH: WHY AI ALGORITHMS MADE TRADITIONAL EARNINGS OBSOLETE AND HOW $150 TURNS INTO A FORTUNE We live in a unique moment in history where the familiar "time = money" formula has completely broken down. Try telling someone from the last century that today you can launch a financial tool with just $150—an amount most people spend on impulse weekend shopping—and 30 days later see $35,000 in your account, wiping…

❤1,020👍392🔥137🤩59🎉50🏆41💯39❤‍🔥33

16 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈111,000 views2,308 reactions13 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

THE QUIET FINANCIAL REVOLUTION: HOW AI ALGORITHMS TURN $150 INTO $35,000 A MONTH (AND WHY YOU NO LONGER NEED MILLIONS TO START) The rules of the game have changed so seamlessly that most people haven't even realized it. While society, out of inertia, continues to glorify the cult of the hard career path and productivity, a completely different trend is unfolding right before our eyes. It ruthlessly divides the world…

❤1,350👍501🔥164🎉95❤‍🔥54🤩50⚡46🏆41

11 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈109,000 views1,589 reactions6 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

The Epidemic of Machine Wealth: How AI Algorithms Turn $150 into Capital (And Why It Makes You Mad) It is official: we are witnessing the most massive and quiet wealth transfer in recent history. If you think the artificial intelligence boom is just about funny pictures and smart chatbots writing texts, you are hopelessly out of touch with reality. Right now, an unprecedented trend in algorithmic trading is unfoldin…

❤949👍358🏆93🔥68❤‍🔥45💯28🤩28🎉20

5 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈111,000 views2,014 reactions5 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

The Mathematics of a Crypto Miracle: How Algorithms Turn $150 into Capital For a long time, a rigid stereotype existed in the investment world: it takes big money to make big money. Traditional markets have conditioned us to believe that there is no room to operate with a small deposit. But automation and the phenomenal liquidity of digital assets have permanently broken this rule. Today, the size of your initial d…

❤1,180👍410🔥139🎉62🏆55💯52🤩47❤‍🔥35

31 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC≈118,000 views1,755 reactions5 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

THE END OF THE WORKAHOLIC ERA: WHY "SMART" MONEY NO LONGER SMELLS LIKE SWEAT Since childhood, we have been programmed with one highly toxic thought: to become rich, you have to work yourself to the bone. We were taught that success means sleepless nights, endless stress, burnout, and living on the edge of your limits. Whether it is a classic offline business with its eternal calculation of margins and taxes, or the …

❤1,020👍383🔥112🤩50💯46🎉45❤‍🔥43⚡35

24 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC≈130,000 views2,303 reactions10 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

THE ALCHEMY OF A NEW ERA: HOW AI TRADING MADE STARTING CAPITAL IRRELEVANT For decades, traditional financial institutions have drilled the same myth into our heads: size matters. We were convinced that the admission ticket to the club of real profit costs tens of thousands of dollars, and people with a modest deposit are left with nothing but to humbly buy index funds and wait for old age, hoping for meager interest…

❤1,330👍478🔥142💯85🎉60❤‍🔥54🏆53🤩53

17 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC≈139,000 views2,784 reactions6 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

THE SNOWBALL EFFECT: HOW MODERN MILLIONAIRES ARE BORN FROM POCKET MONEY If you ask a classic financier how to become a millionaire, they will hand you a dusty manual from the last century: save on coffee, set aside 10% of your salary, buy conservative assets, and wait 40 years. This is a great plan if your main goal is to become the wealthiest pensioner in your neighborhood. But right now, while the world out of in…

❤1,560👍626🔥198🎉96💯75❤‍🔥61⚡56🏆56

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @stellar_bot_public. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@stellar_bot_public edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Coin Bot | Public” (@stellar_bot_public), 299,642 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stellar_bot_public.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.