Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 4 days, net +4,410. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 262,082–267,815 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 23:16
267,153
+922
10 Aug 2026, 21:41
266,231
+922
9 Aug 2026, 23:36
265,309
+1,420
8 Aug 2026, 20:17
263,889
+1,109
7 Aug 2026, 19:48
262,780
+37
7 Aug 2026, 19:00
262,743
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:54
262,743
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 267,153 subscribers
Avg views / post
63,600
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
21 (25 March 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
318,000
Reactions total
8,622
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
40
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
36,221 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19,915
55.0%
👍
8,810
24.3%
🔥
2,231
6.16%
🎉
1,306
3.61%
💯
972
2.68%
🤩
857
2.37%
❤🔥
810
2.24%
🏆
796
2.20%
⚡
524
1.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36,221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
318
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 21 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
107
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stellar_bot_public. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The Epidemic of Machine Wealth: How AI Algorithms Turn $150 into Capital (And Why It Makes You Mad)
It is official: we are witnessing the most massive and quiet wealth transfer in recent history. If you think the artificial intelligence boom is just about funny pictures and smart chatbots writing texts, you are hopelessly out of touch with reality. Right now, an unprecedented trend in algorithmic trading is unfoldin…
The Mathematics of a Crypto Miracle: How Algorithms Turn $150 into Capital
For a long time, a rigid stereotype existed in the investment world: it takes big money to make big money. Traditional markets have conditioned us to believe that there is no room to operate with a small deposit. But automation and the phenomenal liquidity of digital assets have permanently broken this rule.
Today, the size of your initial d…
THE END OF THE WORKAHOLIC ERA: WHY "SMART" MONEY NO LONGER SMELLS LIKE SWEAT
Since childhood, we have been programmed with one highly toxic thought: to become rich, you have to work yourself to the bone. We were taught that success means sleepless nights, endless stress, burnout, and living on the edge of your limits. Whether it is a classic offline business with its eternal calculation of margins and taxes, or the …
THE ALCHEMY OF A NEW ERA: HOW AI TRADING MADE STARTING CAPITAL IRRELEVANT
For decades, traditional financial institutions have drilled the same myth into our heads: size matters. We were convinced that the admission ticket to the club of real profit costs tens of thousands of dollars, and people with a modest deposit are left with nothing but to humbly buy index funds and wait for old age, hoping for meager interest…
THE SNOWBALL EFFECT: HOW MODERN MILLIONAIRES ARE BORN FROM POCKET MONEY
If you ask a classic financier how to become a millionaire, they will hand you a dusty manual from the last century: save on coffee, set aside 10% of your salary, buy conservative assets, and wait 40 years. This is a great plan if your main goal is to become the wealthiest pensioner in your neighborhood.
But right now, while the world out of in…
The Illusion of the "Perfect Moment": Why Smart Algorithms Love Market Crises
The main fear of anyone entering crypto is getting into the market right before a severe crash. For decades, we have been conditioned to believe that you can only make money when the charts are green and everything is flying up. This false mindset has cost millions of people their nerves and savings.
But when you cross over to the side of…
Financial Singularity: Wall Street Has Forever Lost Its Monopoly on Hyper-Profits
If for years you have felt that big money is made differently, that the main piece of the puzzle is being hidden from you — you were absolutely right. The global financial system has always been a closed club where the elite multiplied their capital using technologies inaccessible to mere mortals, while the crowd tried to guess chart m…
The Digital Ultimatum: How the Combo of AI and Turnkey Algorithms Turned the Crypto Market into the Ultimate Social Elevator
Previously, financial success required three things: an elite education, nerves of steel, and a massive suitcase of money at the start. Without these, you stood absolutely no chance in serious markets. But today, this ancient barrier has officially been thrown into the dustbin of history.
We …
The Mathematics of a Crypto Miracle: How Algorithms Turn $150 into Capital
For a long time, a rigid stereotype existed in the investment world: it takes big money to make big money. Traditional markets have conditioned us to believe that there is no room to operate with a small deposit. But automation and the phenomenal liquidity of digital assets have permanently broken this rule.
Today, the size of your initial d…
The Power of Turnkey Solutions: How a Single Registration Changes Your Financial Reality
In modern trading, there is no longer any need to overcomplicate things. Often, it is enough to find the right platform with ready-made algorithms to automate your income and change your life forever.
Here is a snippet from a recent interview with someone for whom a simple registration on such a platform became the point of no …
The End of the HODL Era: Why Passive Waiting is Giving Way to Algorithms
Previously, the main rule of the crypto market was simply to buy a promising asset and forget about it for a couple of years. The "buy and hold" (HODL) strategy truly made many industry pioneers rich. But let's face it: in the realities of 2026, simply sitting on assets is an unaffordable luxury and an inefficient freezing of liquidity.
The ne…
The Flip Side of the Crypto Boom: How Automation Generates Wealth 24/7
While conservative analysts debate the nature of digital assets, a new financial elite is quietly taking control of the market. And whereas the first wave of crypto millionaires was formed by early investors and holders, today’s avalanche of newly rich individuals is the result of total automation.
The high volatility of crypto, which skeptics l…
❤1,000👍371🎉132🔥50🤩45🏆39⚡33💯24
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @stellar_bot_public. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coin Bot | Public” (@stellar_bot_public), 267,153 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stellar_bot_public.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
