Channel
@stefanoceraformatore
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
125subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001651732298 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stefanoceraformatore |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stefanoceraformatore |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 125 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 126 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:40 | 126 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (13 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😎 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔵 𝐂𝐢 𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐨 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐬𝐢 𝐜𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐨 𝐥𝐚 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚. Le parole di Churchill. Il sogno di Martin Luther King. La visione di Kennedy. 👉Che cosa rende questi interventi così memorabili? Nell’ultimo numero della mia newsletter ho raccolto i sette segreti tratti dal TED Talk di Richard Greene, che da anni studia i più grandi oratori della storia. 👉Non è un articolo su come parlare in pubblico. È un invito a riflettere su ciò che…
👍1
🔵 “𝐋𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐨 𝐭𝐢 𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐨 𝐢𝐧 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐭𝐚̀?” Molte persone vivono il momento delle domande come un esame. In realtà, è uno dei momenti migliori per creare connessione con chi ti ascolta. 👉In un articolo pubblicato su Nature Reviews Cancer (giugno 2026), Itai Yanai offre uno spunto molto interessante su questo tema. Ne parlo in questo video. 🎥
🃏 𝐋𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐞. 𝐀𝐢𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐨 𝐚 𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐥𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐞 𝐠𝐢𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐞. Giovedì scorso ho avuto il piacere di parlare di uno degli strumenti che, negli anni, è diventato parte integrante del mio modo di fare formazione: le carte. 🃏 Abbiamo esplorato insieme strumenti molto diversi tra loro – Conflict Cards, Dixit, Metafox, Points of You ed Emotion Cards – scoprendo come possano essere utilizzati per affrontare temi dif…
😎1
🔵 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗼? 𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗼𝗿𝗮 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗶 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝘀𝗰𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗙𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗦. Ti è mai capitato di ascoltare un oratore e sentirti trascinato dalle sue parole? Non è solo questione di contenuto, ma di dove mette il focus delle sue argomentazioni. 🎯 Il focus è il punto di massima attenzione, il centro nevralgico del discorso. Vale per lo sguardo, per il linguaggio del corpo e soprattutto per le parole. 🗣️ 𝗦𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗲, 𝗲𝗻𝗳𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘇𝘇𝗮𝗿…
Photo, posted without a caption
😎1
❌ 𝑶𝒈𝒏𝒊 𝒔𝒍𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒄𝒉𝒆 𝒖𝒔𝒊 𝒉𝒂 𝒖𝒏 𝒄𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒐 E non è un modo di dire. In un articolo pubblicato su Nature Reviews Cancer (giugno 2026), Itai Yanai scrive qualcosa che dovrebbe cambiare il modo in cui progettiamo le nostre slide: 💬 “Ogni slide consuma attenzione. E per questo deve meritarsi il diritto di esistere.” Infatti, eliminare slide inutili non è "fare prima". È progettare un percorso più facile da seguire. E da ricordare.…
❌ 𝐌𝐨𝐥𝐭𝐢 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨 𝐮𝐧 𝐨𝐛𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐨 𝐬𝐛𝐚𝐠𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐨: 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐥 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐨. Ma se il tuo obiettivo fosse un altro? In un recente articolo pubblicato su Nature Reviews Cancer, Itai Yanai scrive una frase che condivido pienamente: 💬 “Lo scopo di una presentazione non è stupire il pubblico, ma rendergli facile capire.” 👉Mi ha ricordato un’idea di Nancy Duarte che cito spesso: 𝐥’𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐳𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐧 𝐞̀ 𝐜𝐡𝐢 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐚. 𝐄…
🎤 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐨 𝐧𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐢𝐚 𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢 𝐢𝐥 𝐦𝐢𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐨𝐧𝐨. Inizia qualche minuto prima. Sono proprio quei minuti a fare la differenza. Nel carosello trovi 5 semplici abitudini che ti aiuteranno a salire sul palco con più presenza, chiarezza e sicurezza. ✅ Prepara il messaggio, non solo il discorso. ⚡ Trasforma l’ansia in energia. 🌬️ Respira profondamente. 🗣️ Articola le parole. 😊 Sorridi. Piccoli gesti, grandi ris…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @stefanoceraformatore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stefano Cera” (@stefanoceraformatore), 125 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stefanoceraformatore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.