Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 65 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 591–600 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Oct 2026, 11:01
592
-5
2 Oct 2026, 00:37
597
+2
17 Sept 2026, 06:40
595
-1
30 Aug 2026, 17:23
596
-2
24 Aug 2026, 06:58
598
+4
15 Aug 2026, 19:25
594
-5
8 Aug 2026, 03:15
599
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:09
599
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 1 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10
50.0%
🤡
5
25.0%
🥱
3
15.0%
👏
2
10.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2025 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hello everyone.
We’re excited to announce our new update. There were many tools for database breach monitoring, but very few had the capability to actually show what was inside the data. Those that could do so were applications with an architecture that had turned into a data dump, making search impossible across all fields. Our team has been working on this for months, and we’ve finally managed to index many things…
Over the next 24 hours, due to updates and improvements, stealseek.io and our Telegram bot will be unavailable for between 30 and 60 minutes.
We working on a major update, so stay tuned.
We listen to and value your feedback, which is why we've revamped our Telegram bot.
Bot Upgraded to New System!
We've completely rebuilt the bot with a faster, more stable architecture. Here's what's new:
✨ New Features:
• Lightning-fast search results
• Multi-language support
• Improved database with 100M+ records
• Better password reveal system
• Enhanced security & privacy
• THE BOT IS COMPLETELY FREE.
🚀 How t…
And although there are certain limits for our active audience on Telegram, we want to provide a free search bot. You can respond to the survey to indicate whether you view this positively or negatively. We will begin development based on the results.
Yes94%
No6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❗️Our long absence from making announcements on the channel has nothing to do with the project being halted or weakened. On the contrary, we are busy developing and updating the system, which is why we haven't been able to make many announcements here. However, we are confident that those who use our website are already aware of the constant tax updates and new features being added.
⭕️ Over the past 5 months, we hav…
Version 2.1 is now active.
80% increase in search speed.
Complex search support.
Free viewing feature for free users.
Read the update notes for more information
UPTADE NOTES
Our website is active and definitely unstoppable
Our website
🥱3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @stealseekk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
And although there are certain limits for our active audience on Telegram, we want to provide a free search bot. You can respond to the survey to indicate whether you view this positively or negatively. We will begin development based on the results.
Yes94%
No6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2025 to 1 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌐 S.S” (@stealseekk), 592 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stealseekk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.