Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Студак

@stdkmedia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,197subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001635352930
TypeChannel
Username@stdkmedia
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stdkmedia

Growth

1,1961,1971,196.59 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers9 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,196–1,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:551,197+1
9 Aug 2026, 18:411,196no change
9 Aug 2026, 02:011,196first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

356 reactions across 13 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52827893729853759478022.5%
6718.8%
custom 52809223120470985764713.2%
custom 52808735985280280934312.1%
🤩328.99%
🔥205.62%
💔154.21%
😁123.37%
custom 535062745800772997571.97%
💯61.69%
🙏61.69%
😍51.40%
🤗51.40%
😈41.12%
20.562%
🎉20.562%
custom 528053458816941934810.281%
custom 528085333057735596010.281%
😱10.281%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 356reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 May 2026, 14:28 UTC908 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Голосуем за лучшую фотографию

  1. 119%
  2. 219%
  3. 329%
  4. 47%
  5. 526%
  6. 612%
  7. 730%
  8. 87%

The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😍52🎉2😈21custom 53506274580077299751

1 May 2026, 14:27 UTC760 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Студенческая весна 2026 Скачать фото бесплатно и без регистрации

💔12🔥7custom 535062745800772997563💯3custom 52805345881694193481custom 52808533305773559601

30 Apr 2026, 19:38 UTC696 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оценка номера от ФМИТ для ИГТИГ Смешанные ансамбли «ПАРТИТУРА ЛЕГЕНД» Просто классный и чистый номер. Нареканий нет, но эмоций не хватило

🔥137custom 52827893729853759477custom 52809223120470985762

30 Apr 2026, 19:37 UTC581 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оценка номера от ИАиС для ЮИ Вокально-хореографический синтез-номер «РУССКИЙ КАРАГОД» + Хороший ход с многоуровневостью Приятный вокал - чистый и народный Приятные рисунки Народный чир - От парней маловато отдачи, дали бы хоть парнишкам микрофоны

7custom 52808735985280280937custom 52827893729853759475custom 52809223120470985763

30 Apr 2026, 19:35 UTC532 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оценка номера от ФИЯ для МПКИДО Бально-спортивный танец «ЧА-ЧА-ЧА» + Ну, что сказать Илья Евтеев - это Илья Евтеев. Они с Дашей очень уверенно и грациозно смотрятся на сцене. Столько энергии. А минусов на мой взгляд не было. Илья вперёд!!! думал над тем, какие минусы могу выделить в этом номере, но все было прекрасно - и парень, и девушка великолепно станцевали. чувствовалась грация и лёгкость, и ни малейшей ошибк

15custom 52809223120470985768custom 52827893729853759478

30 Apr 2026, 17:31 UTC505 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оценка номера от МПКИДО для ФИЯ Академическое пение «Ария Гризабеллы» + Был хорошо подобран свет, девушки гармонично смотрелись вместе и прекрасный вокал - Было видно что в начале очень волновались и тихо пели, из за этого половина слов была неразборчивая

🤩147🙏6💔3

30 Apr 2026, 16:14 UTC522 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оценка номера от ИСИ для ИНК Народный танец«Савардан» + Девочки невероятно чувствуют друг друга, синхрон прекрасный, атмосферу Багдада передали) - Не могу я оценивать такое. Мне просто по определению не нравится

custom 5280873598528028093116custom 52827893729853759476🤩3custom 52809223120470985761

30 Apr 2026, 16:12 UTC507 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оценка номера от ФМИИТ для ГЕО Эстрадная миниатюра «Ночь в музее» + Хорошее выступление) Где-то актуальные шутки, смешно, интересно. - Где-то не понял над чем смеяться. Но в целом - хороший номер :D

custom 528092231204709857610custom 528087359852802809376🤩4custom 52827893729853759472😱1

30 Apr 2026, 16:11 UTC491 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оценка номера от МеИ для ФФ Вокально-инструментальный синтез-номер «Ёру» + Понравился залу, видно подхватили общий вайб и хотели подтанцовывать, красивые костюмы и хорошее пение - Для синтеза недотянули, нужно на голову выше, и громкости добавить солисту

custom 52809223120470985767custom 52827893729853759475💯3custom 528087359852802809332

30 Apr 2026, 16:02 UTC476 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оценка номера от ИМЭ для АИ Вокальная композиция«Мы с тобой одной крови» + Молодец парень, ангельский голосок, видно, старался. - Рома Евстифейкин, задумайся, конкурент растёт

😁125custom 52809223120470985764🤩3😈2custom 52827893729853759472

30 Apr 2026, 15:59 UTC485 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оценка номера от ФФ для МеИ Эстрадный танец «Soul of India» +Моя любимая серия смешариков «Индийский чай» чайни вайн шайни тайни сто процентное попадание в зрителя

custom 528278937298537594712🤩7🤗52

30 Apr 2026, 15:53 UTC496 views36 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оценка номера от ИНК для ИСИ Классический танец «Русская невеста» +Иси как всегда прекрасны, выпустили свою жемчужину Аню Моисееву, даже сказать больше нечего

custom 528278937298537594717custom 52808735985280280938custom 528092231204709857673🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @stdkmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 May 2026, 14:28 UTCAnonymous Poll245 voters

Голосуем за лучшую фотографию

  1. 119%
  2. 219%
  3. 329%
  4. 47%
  5. 526%
  6. 612%
  7. 730%
  8. 87%

The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 1 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 866,017 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Студак” (@stdkmedia), 1,197 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stdkmedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.