Channel
@stattzeitungorg
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,353subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001786211105 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stattzeitungorg |
| Created | 8 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stattzeitungorg |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 2,353 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 2,349 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 2,347 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 2,348 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 2,348 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 81,673 |
| Reactions total | 219 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
178 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 41.6% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 28.1% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 13.5% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 6.74% | |
| 😡 | 9 | 5.06% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 2.81% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.12% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.562% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.562% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
P E R F I D E ! Perfide bezeichnet laut Wikipedia eine besonders hinterhältige, heimtückische und scheinheilige Art oder Tat. Im Völkerrecht ist damit der Vertrauensbruch gemeint, bei dem Schutz oder Rechtfertigungen missbraucht werden. Nehmen wir einmal an das die Studien und unsere bisherige Wahrnehmung betreffend den verheerenden Schadwirkungen eines verbrecherischen Eingriffs in die Gesundheit von Millionen Men…
❤6👍1
Auf den Spuren der "Krebs-Mafia." Pfizer und Co. Studie aus Süd-Korea belegt eine Krebs-Explosion nach „Covid 19 Schutzimpfung“. Pfizer investiert 43 Milliarden in Krebsmedikamente. Beatrix von Storch (AfD) mit brisanten Informationen. 40 Prozent Zuwachs bei Krebsmedikamenten. Gerald Hauser (MdEP): Die Hitzetoten werden instrumentalisiert, die Übersterblichkeit durch Krebs nicht. Wer glaubt in Artikeln wie diesem w…
🔥4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9
Drohnen-Attacke über Leipzig. Wer war´s wirklich? Noch ist nichts geklärt und schon wieder geht es los. Die Akteure von „Nordstream“ oder der ukrainischen Bombe die auf polnischem Gebiet landete haben nichts dazugelernt. Wie sollten sie auch, man schaue nur in das Gesicht von Roderich Kiesewetter, Oberst a.D. dieses Gesicht spricht Bände. Dazu fällt mir ein japanisches Gedicht ein und das geht in etwa so: „An der Wa…
👍4❤2🔥1
Beate Bahner kommt nach Überlingen! VORTRAG: Mittwoch, 2. September 2026 ab 19 Uhr 88662 Überlingen-Nussdorf, Zum Laugele 4. Unkostenbeitrag: 25 Euro. Impfungen: Vernunft, Dogma oder WHO-Wahnsinn? Die Heidelberger Rechtsanwältin für Medizinrecht, Beate Bahner, teilt am 2. September Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen aus ihrer Fachkanzlei in Heidelberg mit ihrem Publikum in Überlingen. Immer wieder macht die zweifache B…
❤8👍2
„Eingesperrt in 15-Minuten-Städten“. Der Europapolitiker Marc Jongen (ESN). In einer Zeit in der die EU in aller Munde ist, und maßgeblich die Geschicke unserer Heimatländer bestimmt, nutzte stattzeitung.net im Parlament in Straßburg die Gelegenheit, mit einem der führende Köpfe der ESN (Europa der Souveränen Nationen) über Themen zu sprechen, die uns alle betreffen. Über „15-Minuten-Städte“ sprach ich mit dem Spit…
👍2
„Migranten-Sturm“ Volksverdummung? Steht der nächste „Lockdown“ an? Ernst Wolff, vor allem Finanzanalyst und einer der Kritiker von so ziemlich allem in diesem korrupten und maroden System, dieser Ernst Wolff bezeichnet den „Migranten-Sturm“ auf die spanische Exklave Ceuta quasi als ein Täuschungsmanöver. Wolff könnte sich wieder einmal nicht irren, denn das rund 60.000 marokkanische „Flüchtlinge“ aus dem Nichts …
❤3👎1
Wer macht das Wetter? Hitze im Sommer entsteht aufgrund von natürlichen Wetterbedingungen – seit Jahrtausenden. Außerirdische Faktoren haben Wettereinfluss. Lokal kann man Hitze, sprich schönes Wetter, manipulieren. Über die HAARP-Technologie lässt sich anscheinend großflächig Dürre erzeugen. Der Staat setzt auf „Hitzetode“ als politisches Programm zwecks Bevormundung des Volkes. Ja, es ist heiß im Süden Deutschlan…
👍6💯3
Martin Sellner als neuer Innenminister. Remigration ist möglich- aber nicht politisch gewollt. Das „Gerede“ vom Schutz der europäischen Außengrenzen ist nichts anderes als eben dies- Gerede. 60.000 Migranten, überwiegend Männer, sind aktuell in Ceuta „gelandet“, es gab bisher 39 Tote. Die spanische Enklave ist dieser Invasion hoffnungslos ausgesetzt, die spanischen Gesetze machen diesen „Überfall“ aber erst möglich.…
👍7💯4❤2
Überlingen. Das „Wild-West“ für Radler und Scooter. Auf den Gehwegen, vorzugsweise als Paar oder in der Gruppe und meist entgegen der Fahrtrichtung. Auf der Uferpromenade von West nach Ost und selbstverständlich auch im Bereich des Landungsplatz. Im Stadtgarten. Im Badgarten. Und natürlich in der sogenannten Fußgängerzone „Münsterstraße“, zwischen den Tischen der Gastronomie. Überall Radfahrer und Elektro-Scooterfah…
👍5❤1
Das Geschäftsmodell „Migration“. Die spanische Exklave Ceuta wird von rund 50.000 Migranten überrannt. Alice Weidel: „Notfalls den Schengen Raum mit Blick auf Spanien aussetzen“. Das Schleuserwesen feiert nach wie vor Hochkonjunktur. Inzwischen stehen Vorwürfe im Raum, NGO´s machen mit Schleusern gemeinsame Sache. „United4Rescue“ von der evangelischen Kirche greift Seenotrettungsaktivisten finanziell unter die Arme.…
💯9❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤16
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @stattzeitungorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 55,216 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“stattzeitung.net - Info” (@stattzeitungorg), 2,353 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stattzeitungorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.