Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🦄 Startup News

@startupnews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,783subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001042239832
TypeChannel
Username@startupnews
Created9 April 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/startupnews

Growth

2,7832,7932,7885 August 2026 — 2,793 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,793 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,791 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,789 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,783 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,782–2,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:432,783-6
9 Aug 2026, 14:112,789-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:202,791-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:162,793no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:032,793first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 2,783 subscribers
Avg views / post
564
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held19 (6 August 202530 July 2026)
Views total564
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,478 reactions across 18 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍43212.4%
42712.3%
🔥42512.2%
🥰40411.6%
😍38611.1%
🎉38311.0%
😁2958.48%
👏2717.79%
❤‍🔥1323.80%
🤩1203.45%
💯1133.25%
👾310.891%
🤣110.316%
🤯110.316%
🦄110.316%
🙏100.288%
😢50.144%
💔30.086%
👀20.058%
👎20.058%
3 further kinds40.115%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,478reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @startupnews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2025 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 04:23 UTC564 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Журналистке Дарья Шипачева запросили 12 лет заключения по делу о госизмене Об этом сообщает корреспондент «Медиазоны» из Мосгорсуда. До суда Дарья более года провела в ростовском СИЗО, куда была перевезена сразу после задержания. Суть обвинений не разглашается. Процесс проходил в закрытом режиме. В ходе прений защита просила учесть признание вины и содействие следствию. Рассмотрение уголовного дела прошло за одно

6 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC≈1,380 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁107💔3🤣2🤯1😢1

12 Jun 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,560 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Questioner out of blue. What tech company/product/service you can call a “cult” rather strong brand identity

  1. Apple Ecosystem (not a standalone gadget)45%
  2. SuperHuman16%
  3. Linux11%
  4. Netflix26%
  5. Spotify21%
  6. Notion21%
  7. Strava11%
  8. Else (let you know in DM)0%

The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥2😁1

20 May 2026, 18:10 UTC≈2,580 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
File

📕 Гайд от Anthropic по созданию AI-стартапа

🔥107👍2🦄1

13 May 2026, 07:25 UTC≈2,470 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚀 We are excited to announce the launch of the Plug and Play International Acceleration Program in Cyprus! Applications are now open for startups ready to scale internationally and expand beyond their home markets. The program is implemented by Plug and Play Cyprus and co-funded by the Deputy Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digital Policy and the Research and Innovation Foundation. The program provides startup

🎉5👾3👍2

29 Jan 2026, 07:23 UTC≈4,840 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀 UNICEF Startup Lab Cohort 6 Это программа для старатапов ранних стадий, которые создают решения для детей, подростков и незащищенных сообществ. Кто может подать заявку: – Социальные предприниматели и стартапы – Команды, которые разработывают инновационные и масштабируемые решения – Предприниматели, которые хотели бы найти глобальных партнеров для развития своего проекта – Стартапы, которые работают на развивающих

7🎉3🥰3🙏3👍2💯2🕊2🤯2

20 Jan 2026, 11:22 UTC≈3,220 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Framework: Say the Thing Being nice is good, making sure people are comfortable is not necessarily good at a startup. Shopify’s COO sent this note to his team early on, after realizing that people were more concerned with not offending each other than getting to the truth of problems they were trying to solve. It’s an incredible and concise statement that more companies would benefit from. At a startup, there’s

👾6🤯6🦄43👍3🔥2🙏2🥰1

16 Dec 2025, 09:04 UTC≈3,470 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В a16z проанализировали отчёт State of AI от OpenRouter и заметили интересную закономерность: в SaaS вы запускаете MVP, наблюдаете отток клиентов и в спешке улучшаете продукт, надеясь, что удержание пользователей улучшится. С AI-стартапами всё иначе: разработчики постоянно тестируют новые AI-модели в поисках идеального решения. Большинство пробуют и уходят, но когда появляется модель, которая решает их критическую п

👾173🥰2👍1👏1🤯1🙏1

15 Dec 2025, 10:48 UTC≈2,610 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

EU-Startups Summit 7 и 8 мая собирает 2,500 фаундеров, инвесторов и стартап-энтузиастов со всей Европы. Главное событие — Pitch Competition, где выступят 15 наиболее перспективных стартапов региона. У каждого участника будет 3 минуты, чтобы представить свою идею на главной сцене перед аудиторией, после чего свои вопросы зададут представители жюри. Критерии отбора стартапа: – основан в Европе не более 3 лет назад, –

6👾3🙏2🥰1😢1

15 Dec 2025, 10:03 UTC556 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @EventsMoscow

Посыпаемся блестками и собираемся на митапы – если вас еще не накрыло предпраздничной суетой и декабрьскими отчетами, самое время спланировать свое участие в последних митапах и конференциях 2025 года: Team Lead Today 📅 15 декабря 2025, 9:00 — 22:00 📍Москва, AZIMUT Сити Отель Смоленская, 3 этаж, залы Москва, Уфа, Воронеж, ул. Смоленская, д. 8 — Прикладная конференция с инсайтами о том, как строить эффективные коман

👍62🤔1

5 Dec 2025, 14:57 UTC665 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @datageeksclubPhoto

Funds raised during the 2009–2013 vintages outperformed dramatically — with 2010 reaching a 31.0x multiple on disciplined fund sizes. Credits: RBCx, Cambridge Associates, PitchBook, 2024 Vintage Analysis

9👍1🤯1

28 Nov 2025, 07:21 UTC≈2,390 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣93👎1💯1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @startupnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jun 2026, 09:36 UTCAnonymous Poll38 voters

Questioner out of blue. What tech company/product/service you can call a “cult” rather strong brand identity

  1. Apple Ecosystem (not a standalone gadget)45%
  2. SuperHuman16%
  3. Linux11%
  4. Netflix26%
  5. Spotify21%
  6. Notion21%
  7. Strava11%
  8. Else (let you know in DM)0%

The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 145,479 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🦄 Startup News” (@startupnews), 2,783 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startupnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.