Channel
@startupcollection
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,233subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001215834470 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @startupcollection |
| Created | 9 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/startupcollection |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 5 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @startupcollection/4504 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC | @bestofprojects/26813 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC | 1.00 | 44 hours |
| @startupcollection/4508 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC | @bestofprojects/26823 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @startupcollection/4507 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC | @bestofprojects/26833 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC | 1.00 | 1.9 hours |
| @startupcollection/4513 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC | @bestofprojects/26874 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC | 1.00 | 53 minutes |
| @startupcollection/4511 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC | @bestofprojects/26884 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC | 1.00 | 9.4 hours |
| @startupcollection/4516 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC | @bestofprojects/26905 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC | 1.00 | 31 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @bestofprojects | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 62 minutes | this entry (10–0) |
| @InvestCommunity21 | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 47 minutes | this entry (6–3) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 5 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @InvestCommunity21. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 5 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 20:58 | 1,233 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:09 | 1,237 | +3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:39 | 1,234 | +4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 1,230 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 1,234 | +3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:58 | 1,231 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:07 | 1,233 | -3 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:28 | 1,236 | -1 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 02:16 | 1,237 | -3 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 1,240 | +9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 1,231 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 1,230 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 1,229 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:33 | 1,228 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 1,224 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:09 | 1,225 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 1,224 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 1,223 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 1,224 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 1,222 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🚀 Приглашаем проекты и спикеров на тематические питч-сессии в рамках Инвестиционных бизнес-завтраков: 📌 12 августа — Инвестиции в недвижимость 📌 26 августа — Инвестиции в туристическую инфраструктуру 📌 2 сентября — Инвестиции в ИИ-проекты и робототехнику Что получают проекты, выступая на завтраках: — Прямой контакт с 40-50 участниками завтрака. — Рассылка подготовленных проектов нашим партнерам: частным инвестора…
💥💥💥💥 Приглашаем на ближайшие мероприятия Клуба инвестиционного нетворкинга: 🔴 Август, по мере формирования группы "Инвестиционный запуск". Авторский онлайн-интенсив Сергея Ореханова для проектов, привлекающих инвестиции 🔴 12 августа, 10:00, Москва 6-я мини-конференция из серии «Сделка». Инвестиции в недвижимость 🔴 19 августа, 10:00, Москва Инвестиционный бизнес-завтрак Клуба инвестиционного нетворкинга 🔴 26 авгус…
🚀 Приглашаем проекты и спикеров на тематические питч-сессии в рамках Инвестиционных бизнес-завтраков: 📌 12 августа — Инвестиции в недвижимость 📌 26 августа — Инвестиции в туристическую инфраструктуру 📌 2 сентября — Инвестиции в ИИ-проекты и робототехнику Что получают проекты, выступая на завтраках: — Прямой контакт с 40-50 участниками завтрака. — Рассылка подготовленных проектов нашим партнерам: частным инвестора…
🚀 Какие проекты представили на инвестиционном бизнес-завтраке 5 августа Провели очередной инвестиционный бизнес-завтрак и посмотрели проекты, которые сегодня ищут возможности для роста и масштабирования. Каждый питч стал поводом для живого обсуждения, вопросов и обмена опытом. 👇 🔹 ArmadaDetal. Экосистема обслуживания спецтехники Проект развивает комплексное обслуживание владельцев спецтехники: поставку запчастей, с…
📣 Встречаемся завтра — Инвестиционный бизнес-завтрак Клуба инвестиционного нетворкинга Основные темы: 1️⃣ Инвестиционные платформы: живой обзор и практические сценарии. Демонстрация интерфейсов, разбор кейсов, алгоритмы работы для фаундеров и инвесторов. 2️⃣ Меры государственной поддержки бизнеса. Оценка НМА. Сколково. Применение налоговых льгот Сколково, МИК, ОЭЗ; Льготный лизинг, факторинг, одобрение лимитов на …
🚀 Приглашаем проекты и спикеров на тематические питч-сессии в рамках Инвестиционных бизнес-завтраков: 📌 5 августа — Инвестиционные платформы 📌 12 августа — Инвестиции в недвижимость 📌 26 августа — Меры господдержки: от моральных до миллиардных 📌 2 сентября — Инвестиции в ИИ-проекты и робототехнику Что получают проекты, выступая на завтраках: — Прямой контакт с 40-50 участниками завтрака. — Рассылка подготовленны…
🔥 Инвестиционные платформы, льготы от Сколково, господдержка и питч-сессия проектов — завтра на Инвестиционном завтраке Среди спикеров: 👤 Тот, кто объединяет инвестиционные платформы, финтех и искусственный интеллект в единую экосистему — расскажет, как AI уже меняет рынок краудлендинга и инвестиционных платформ, какие процессы можно автоматизировать с помощью искусственного интеллекта, как технологии помогают сниж…
💥💥💥💥 Приглашаем на ближайшие мероприятия Клуба инвестиционного нетворкинга: 📌 Август, по мере формирования группы "Инвестиционный запуск". Авторский онлайн-интенсив Сергея Ореханова для проектов, привлекающих инвестиции 📌 5 августа, 10:00, Москва Инвестиционные платформы. Меры государственной поддержки бизнеса. Инвестиционный бизнес-завтрак Клуба инвестиционного нетворкинга 📌 12 августа, 10:00, Москва 6-я мини-кон…
⌛️ Встречаемся завтра — Инвестиционный бизнес-завтрак Клуба инвестиционного нетворкинга Основные темы: 1️⃣ Инвестиционные платформы: живой обзор и практические сценарии. Демонстрация интерфейсов, разбор кейсов, алгоритмы работы для фаундеров и инвесторов. 2️⃣ Меры государственной поддержки бизнеса. Оценка НМА. Сколково. Применение налоговых льгот Сколково, МИК, ОЭЗ; Льготный лизинг, факторинг, одобрение лимитов на…
🚀 «Меры государственной поддержки бизнеса. Оценка НМА. Сколково» — новая тема Инвестиционного бизнес-завтрака 5 августа Как использовать государственные инструменты поддержки для развития бизнеса и привлечения финансирования? На бизнес-завтраке разберем: ▪️ налоговые льготы Сколково, МИК и ОЭЗ; ▪️ льготный лизинг и факторинг; ▪️ банковские гарантии и механизмы их получения; ▪️ меры государственной поддержки для биз…
"Инвестиционные платформы: живой обзор и практические сценарии". 🟠 демонстрация интерфейсов 🟠 разбор кейсов 🟠 алгоритмы работы для фаундеров и инвесторов 📍 5 августа, Москва | Инвестиционный бизнес-завтрак Клуба инвестиционного нетворкинга Среди спикеров: ▪️ Баев Дмитрий Основатель инвестиционной платформы BBKinvest (краудлендинг, займы под залог) с ИИ-сервисами. В контуре платформы внедрили ИИ-помощника по подго…
#СпикерыЗавтрака5августа 🤝 Представляем спикеров Инвестиционного бизнес-завтрака 5 августа 👤 Дмитрий Баев Основатель BBK-IT и инвестиционной платформы BBKinvest. Эксперт в области финтеха, кредитования и внедрения искусственного интеллекта. Более 15 лет опыта в банковской сфере и финансовом бизнесе. За время своей карьеры Дмитрий прошел путь от специалиста кредитного отдела банка до владельца собственной компан…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @startupcollection. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Russian startups and inventions. Guide for Investor.” (@startupcollection), 1,233 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startupcollection.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.