Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 51 days, net +185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,007–10,248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 00:21
10,220
+52
17 Sept 2026, 14:16
10,168
+12
15 Sept 2026, 13:58
10,156
-11
13 Sept 2026, 19:17
10,167
-3
9 Sept 2026, 20:58
10,170
-2
6 Sept 2026, 12:20
10,172
-1
4 Sept 2026, 04:18
10,173
-2
2 Sept 2026, 20:34
10,175
-5
1 Sept 2026, 20:35
10,180
+23
31 Aug 2026, 18:54
10,157
-6
30 Aug 2026, 22:23
10,163
+2
29 Aug 2026, 23:35
10,161
-6
28 Aug 2026, 20:36
10,167
+27
27 Aug 2026, 18:44
10,140
+3
26 Aug 2026, 21:58
10,137
-7
25 Aug 2026, 19:33
10,144
+4
24 Aug 2026, 17:16
10,140
-7
21 Aug 2026, 16:05
10,147
+2
20 Aug 2026, 11:33
10,145
+2
19 Aug 2026, 08:07
10,143
first reading
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.08%
avg views ÷ 10,220 subscribers
Avg views / post
213
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
77 (28 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
638
Reactions total
15
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
514 reactions across 69 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
87
16.9%
🔥
63
12.3%
⚡
60
11.7%
custom 5965443999136223076
36
7.00%
👍
34
6.61%
custom 5228718354658769982
28
5.45%
custom 5244767646716536449
28
5.45%
custom 5355014749920709843
20
3.89%
custom 5359726582447487916
13
2.53%
custom 5438153600100483502
12
2.33%
custom 5467658895847608185
12
2.33%
❤🔥
11
2.14%
👌
10
1.95%
👀
9
1.75%
custom 5296401966887345356
8
1.56%
💯
8
1.56%
👨💻
7
1.36%
😎
7
1.36%
custom 5237799019329105246
5
0.973%
custom 5359584650958226302
4
0.778%
22 further kinds
52
10.1%
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 514 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 69 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @startup_course_com. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.30%
1 of 77 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
689
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
701
over 68 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
j1SUmX8FZerZ4nRk5
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🏅🤝 Митап с криптомиллиардером Баладжи Шривасан 2-го сентября
Можно ли превратить онлайн-сообщество в место, где люди встречаются, работают вместе и запускают новые проекты?
Именно вокруг этой идеи Balaji Srinivasan, предприниматель, инвестор и бывший CTO Coinbase, создал Network School - сообщество, объединяющее разработчиков, фаундеров и технологических предпринимателей со всего мира. Теперь Network School запуска…
🗝️ С 10:00 День открытых дверей "DAMU"
28 августа Фонд «Даму» проведет День открытых дверей для предпринимателей.
На мероприятии вы сможете:
🔹 узнать об актуальных инструментах поддержки бизнеса;
🔹 получить информацию об условиях и порядке получения финансирования;
🔹 напрямую задать вопросы руководству Фонда, представителям банков второго уровня (БВУ), государственных органов и других организаций.
📅 28 августа 202…
🎓 Гранты на развитие образовательных проектов в Казахстане от Tamyr Platform. Поддержка проектов, которые помогают решать проблему образовательного неравенства в Казахстане.
Подать заявку могут:
• частные лица и команды
• НПО и образовательные центры
• образовательные проекты
• стартапы в сфере образования
Важно: проект должен уже находиться на стадии реализации, иметь MVP или быть готовым к масштабированию. Приори…
ИИ кратно ускорил разработку продуктов: генерация гипотез, исследования, аналитика и сборка MVP сегодня занимают часы вместо недель.
👉Ограничения роста смещаются в сторону вывода продукта на рынок,
привлечения пользователей
и качества управленческих решений.
⚡️На вебинаре обсудим:
— как меняются роли и процессы в командах под влиянием ИИ;
— как перераспределять ресурсы между разработкой, продажами и маркетингом;
— …
🦸🏼♀️ Ультра четверг 27.08:
t.me/startup_course_com/6142
10:00 💸 Бизнес-ангел с TMT Investments в Алматы Хаб t.me/startup_course_com/6172
16:00 🇺🇿🇰🇬💰🇰🇿 Venture Day Activat.VC с венчурными фондами Узбекистана и Кыргызстана t.me/startup_course_com/6148
Для технарей и СТО:
- Внедрении ИИ от VK Tech,
- Кибербез ИСАКА в КБТУ,
- Антифрод Халык в ТРЦ Форум,
- Копилот в Билайн,
- SEO в КИМЭП и ... t.me/uppertunity/531
🚶🏼…
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @startup_course_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@startup_course_com edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
bluescreen.kz @bluescreenkz · 24,045 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 September 2026
The Tech @thetechkz · 27,098 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
grants.kz @grants_scholarships · 53,384 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
Creative Asia @we_project · 72,516 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
IT Вакансии Казахстан @workitkz · 35,636 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Dev KZ | Vacancy @devkz_jobs · 25,182 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 September 2026
JobKZ: вакансии / работа в Казахстане @jobkz_1 · 37,544 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
HIRED @hiredvalley · 26,299 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📢 Возможности 🚀 startup-course.com 💰” (@startup_course_com), 10,220 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startup_course_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
