Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for О тендерных продажах. By Ася Муфтахина

Channel

О тендерных продажах. By Ася Муфтахина

@start_tender

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,610subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001424445350
TypeChannel
Username@start_tender
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/start_tender

Growth

1,6031,6121,607.57 August 2026 — 1,603 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,603 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,608 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,612 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,609 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,610 subscribers1,6107 August 202627 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 21 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,602–1,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 20:561,610+1
24 Aug 2026, 13:541,609-3
20 Aug 2026, 15:441,612+4
14 Aug 2026, 03:561,608+5
7 Aug 2026, 07:301,603no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:271,603first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.16%
avg views ÷ 1,610 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (7 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total83
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7153.0%
3727.6%
👍1712.7%
😁96.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @start_tender. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC83 viewsread 7 August 2026

Новое видео на ютуб. Это весенний кейс, я вообще не успеваю записывать. Но тем не менее, он актуален. Частично писала об этом проекте и здесь - про инженера, как слабое звено, и про ии, который мы под это встраивали. Подробнее в видео. Поставьте пожалуйста лайк, чтоб после долгого перерыва ютубчик меня заценил ☺️ https://youtu.be/pn1vJekDbAc?si=SylVNTvXEn6G5ZaY

Signed Asya Muf

29 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC257 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я пропала, потому что крепко задумалась. ▫️Долгое время я просто мечтала построить консалтинговый бизнес. Ну я построила. Оказалось, что я могу вести 5-7 проектов одновременно и это максимум. С учетом делегирования всего, что можно делегировать, и с учетом большой встройки Чатика в мою консалтинговую практику. Я старалась, как могла. Наверно, я могу взять 7-9 консалтинговых проектов и погибнуть в честном бою, но наф

7🔥6👍5

Signed Asya Muf

20 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC367 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С нынешними возможностями Чатика аналитика становится просто прекрасна. А возможность быстро сделать макет дашборда - пушка-бомба. Это мы собираем дашборд для тендерного отдела в Битриксе. Раньше надо было это все мучительно отрисовывать. Сейчас, чтобы получить кастомизированный макет дашборда, мне потребовалось буквально 15 минут. Дальше тз, разработка и офигенный инструмент управления. Надо добавить, что под ка

5👍5🔥4

Signed Asya Muf

17 Jun 2026, 09:19 UTC577 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Работать на дефицитном рынке в тендерах - целое искусство. Как безопасно подавать заявки (которые являются офертами) на рынке, на котором в наличии товар сегодня есть по одной цене, а завтра его нет или он по вообще другой цене - тот еще вопрос. А надо очень много сразу и всем. И все то по 44, то по 223. Самое любопытное в этом - уметь находить такие рынки. Это что-то из серии "темок", но если в это научиться эколо

5🔥5

Signed Asya Muf

15 Jun 2026, 12:54 UTC458 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У меня сейчас есть неожиданный проект, в котором я строю тендерный отдел. И так получилось, что на первых порах подаю заявки. Давно не было практики, ниша простая, я решила, что это хорошая идея. Никогда раньше подача заявок не была такой веселой. Вы когда-то подавали заявки на уже закончившийся тендер в МАКС? А я - да🌚 Заказчик сам попросил) Почти половина тендеров, на которые мы подаемся - либо уже с завершенным

3

Signed Asya Muf

15 Jun 2026, 05:25 UTC410 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Про декодеры. Неожиданно 🌚

2

Signed Asya Muf

3 Jun 2026, 08:47 UTC535 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На курсе по управлению тендерными продажами работаем сейчас с 4 компаниями. Цель одна - конверсия\деньги. Но пути разные. 🔹В компании, которая занимается поставками запчастей, разбираемся с воронкой. Здесь конечно все круто - битрикс, большой объем данных, большая команда. И от этого сложно)) приходится заново идти путь, который уже был пройден, но моими глазами. Начали с того, чтобы находить больше тендеров, то ест

🔥73

Signed Asya Muf

1 Jun 2026, 11:56 UTC403 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В эту среду 3 июня выступаю на конференции у партнеров, буду рассказывать про изменение рынка тендерных продаж в этом году. Я много общаюсь с представителями разных тендерных бизнесов, провела несколько десятков консультаций в этом году и кое-что уже можно обобщить. Кое-что неутешительное. Решений конкретных тоже не дам, извините)) Но расскажу про стратегии тендерных продаж, про усложнение рынка и что можно попроб

🔥5

Signed Asya Muf

25 May 2026, 11:49 UTC463 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Готовлюсь к семинару 27 мая (солдаут, мест нет). Но вы просто посмотрите, как чатгпт рисует. Мой шок в шоке. Остановите моего внутреннего эксперта-эстета... я же не смогу дальше жить, зная, какое красивое все может быть... Придется теперь все курсы перезаписать 🌚

🔥10😁3

Signed Asya Muf

21 May 2026, 09:41 UTC486 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Провела 5 разборов для разных тендерных бизнесов. И отправила в черный список человека 3. Это те, кто считает, что если разбор бесплатный, то почему-то на него можно записаться и не приходить. Благодаря им думаю, что надо такие разборы делать платными, потому что по сути это мои консультации. Они, если что, стоят 10-20тр. Но пока разборов больше не будет, на след неделе начинается обучение. В практику берем разные

🔥8

Signed Asya Muf

19 May 2026, 14:33 UTC384 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я заготовила еще миллион постов про то, какой у меня уникальный курс, но... группа набрана. Я пока не знаю, как мы успеем все даже в таком составе, поэтому можно сказать, что солдаут. Разборов больше нет, мест на тариф с практикой тоже (спасибо за доверие). В следующий раз может быть осенью, но это не точно. С таким запросом на консалтинговые проекты, просто чудо, что я вписалась проводить этот семинар)) Но была се

🔥32

Signed Asya Muf

15 May 2026, 09:24 UTC389 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

В моей системе произошел сбой и я отчаянно пытаюсь взбить это маслице))😳 В конце прошлого года я поняла, что генерировать контент уже нет сил и времени - это легко увидеть по моему ютубу, там вышло интервью с Димой, которое я делала два месяца (это оч долго для моего производственного цикла). И я поняла - что все, бобиксдох. Процесс генерации и производства качественного, не GPT контента (то есть новые знания), отв

🔥7😁42

Signed Asya Muf

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @start_tender. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,599,884 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Закупки и тендеры по 44-ФЗ, 223-ФЗ
@zakupki44fz · 49,040
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“О тендерных продажах. By Ася Муфтахина” (@start_tender), 1,610 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/start_tender.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.