Channel
@starsAndgifty
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002612911206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @starsAndgifty |
| Description | Реклама/связь - @damoi_f Писать только по делу. Также можно приобрести звезды и подарки по низким ценам |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/starsAndgifty |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 3 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 91.7% | |
| custom 5301209882127528217 | 1 | 8.33% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2025 to 15 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
и да. боты запрещены? нет. по сути-просто вспомогательный инструмент, но для чего? в этом вся суть подарков? расфлипаться в +50$ сразу после солд аута? подарки никогда уже не будут как прежде. нужно менять систему, менять идеологию. подарок должен быть подарком, а не расфлипом🤷♂️ лично у меня нет претензий ни к модерам охуенко, ни к кому другому. у каждого доступ был к автобаю😎
❤2
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
думайте. https://t.me/OHUENKOchat/1263553
❤1
🍬 To celebrate Telegram’s birthday and the summer holiday season, we’re dropping some limited-edition gifts within the next hour: Durov’s Sunglasses, Resistance Dog, Sandcastle, Surfboard and Pink Flamingo 🎁
https://t.me/OHUENKOchat/1253647 чат креативного директора тг что за динозавр? ахахха
custom 53012098821275282171
прогрев полным ходом идет
❤1
подарков не будэ🚀
Подарков сегодня не будет, можете спать спокойно. Из-за чего слухи пошли?
ЖДЕМ???
🧐Помните сериал про похищенные улучшения? Сегодня долгожданное продолжение! В 1:30 по Мск, продолжение сериала. Вас ждёт абсолютно новая механика, специальные гости и кое что ещё...🎁) Увидимся сегодня в 1:30 по Мск😏
⚠️ ВКИД ОТ ВСЕХ ПАБЛИКОВ ⚠️ 📰 По пабликам гуляет скриншот со строчками кода, что якобы для покупки подарков необходим 10 уровень аккаунта Почему это вброс: 1) Ни один датамайнер, в том числе @teleLakel, ничего не писал об этом. 2) Какой смысл Дурову выпускать подарки от какого-то уровня, если уровень растет при покупке подарков. 3) Ни один из этих пабликов не прикрепляет ссылку на github код, где «находится» эта …
ждем всем селом?
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @starsAndgifty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
день рождения тг
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2025 to 15 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stars gift” (@starsAndgifty), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starsAndgifty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.