Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 86 days, net -1,892. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,405–4,150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 08:17
1,889
-5
30 Oct 2026, 02:41
1,894
-4
26 Oct 2026, 18:08
1,898
+3
23 Oct 2026, 11:04
1,895
-2
20 Oct 2026, 16:00
1,897
-4
18 Oct 2026, 01:47
1,901
+9
14 Oct 2026, 23:56
1,892
+2
11 Oct 2026, 08:17
1,890
+3
5 Oct 2026, 03:41
1,887
+59
26 Sept 2026, 03:40
1,828
+35
17 Sept 2026, 08:40
1,793
+29
13 Sept 2026, 13:37
1,764
+42
9 Sept 2026, 07:58
1,722
-2,111
3 Sept 2026, 15:20
3,833
+2
31 Aug 2026, 07:44
3,831
+3
28 Aug 2026, 06:15
3,828
+4
25 Aug 2026, 06:36
3,824
-8
22 Aug 2026, 11:24
3,832
+16
18 Aug 2026, 18:52
3,816
+33
15 Aug 2026, 14:56
3,783
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
946 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5454017834902392037
456
48.2%
custom 5474454655096359190
200
21.1%
custom 5413476410234784989
114
12.1%
custom 5244932062359620058
109
11.5%
custom 5195015149286620657
39
4.12%
custom 5195150213123174848
28
2.96%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 946 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вчера ты плакала — Sirra
— Давай пальто, повешу рядом с камином, — сказал Чонгук и кивнул в сторону гостиной.
Тэхён удивлённо приподнял брови.
— Мы уже перешли на «ты»? — он сказал это беззлобно и с маленькой невольной улыбкой.
— Ну, хочешь, неловко помнёмся у двери ради приличия? — точно таким же тоном ответил Чонгук и протянул руку, чтобы всё же забрать потяжелевшее пальто. — Давай.
🐈⬛
AU: в котором родители Тэхёна выгнали его из дома, поэтому он собирался ночевать на скамейке в парке, но его планы изменил Чонгук, который возвращался с аптеки домой
part 5
#останьсясомнойAU
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @starryskyneo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Summativlər (KSQ - BSQ) @Summativ1 · 19,448 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“moon fairy tale 🪐” (@starryskyneo), 1,889 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starryskyneo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
