Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Денис, посоветуй

Channel

Денис, посоветуй

@starostinflix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,250subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001467833497
TypeChannel
Username@starostinflix
Created23 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/starostinflix

Growth

3,2503,2553,252.56 August 2026 — 3,252 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,252 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,255 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,252 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,250 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,249–3,256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:463,250-2
12 Aug 2026, 03:353,252-3
9 Aug 2026, 12:513,255+3
6 Aug 2026, 10:203,252no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:043,252first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 3,250 subscribers
Avg views / post
861
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total12,053
Reactions total252
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

381 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18548.6%
👍8221.5%
🔥7419.4%
205.25%
🥱133.41%
👎51.31%
🤔20.525%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC479 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Время теории: как рождаются серии «Рика и Морти» Написал обзор на очередной сезон и задумался о том, как изменилось создание серий «РиМ» за эти годы с учетом смены команды. О методе «колеса истории» Дэна Хармона сказано уж слишком много, но всегда было интересно — придерживаются ли его сценарная комната сериала, или это все маркетинг? Шоураннер сериала Скотт Мардер в одном из недавних интервью подробно описывает про

11🔥54

3 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC576 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тимур написал в Афишу текст по результатам рисерча того, как кинокритики и киножурналисты используют нейросети. Я тоже принял участие в этом опросе, поэтому могу прокомментировать пару моментов: — Некоторые факты в статье устарели. Например, оценка того, как ChatGPT анализирует расовые вопросы в кино: «Чат-бот выдумывал факты и вводил новых персонажей». Анализ проводился в январе 2023 года, еще на версии ChatGPT 3.

9👎1

31 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC804 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Про 9-й сезон «Рика и Морти» пишут преступно мало Я прочитал с десяток интервью шоураннера Скотта Мардера и Дэна Хармона, и в их словах чувствуется, что команда мультсериала впервые с 4(!) сезона обрела постоянство. Работе перестала мешать пандемия, отмена создателя, депрессия Хармона и теперь, под руководством Мардера, у «РиМ» есть стабильное расписание и возможность креативить без страха закрытия шоу. Это все под

9🥱2

30 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC≈1,010 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 31 июля — день рождения Гарри Поттера. По этому случаю я приготовил для вас небольшой интерактив Давайте заглянем в лавку Олливандера за новой волшебной палочкой. Ответьте на три вопроса и соберите ключ: например, ААА или АББ. Затем перейдите по своей ссылке и узнайте, какая палочка выбрала вас: 🤩 Столкнувшись с неизвестной вам магией, вы первым делом… А — пытаетесь понять, как устроено заклинание Б — пытаетесь

🔥177🥱7👍3👎2

30 Jul 2026, 05:29 UTC876 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Одна из самых интересных фишек грядущей Silent Hill: Townfall — поиск сюжетных фрагментов с помощью радио Silent Hill: Townfall долго оставалась самым загадочным проектом нынешнего возрождения серии. Теперь режиссёр Джон Маккеллан и продюсер Мотои Окамото наконец раскрыли несколько нарративных подробностей об игре, которая выйдет уже 24 сентября: ✅ Радиоприёмник заменит устройство CRTV Фирменное радио Silent Hill

👍85🔥4

29 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC733 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пока все ждут премьеры колобка «Человека-паука: Новый день», Подкастозавры вновь собрали гигантскую коллаборацию, чтобы рассказать практически обо всех кино- и анимационных версиях Человека-паука в истории. Меня как спикера там нет, но я заглянул в подкаст «Эффект Эмметта Брауна» к коллегам, чтобы рассказать о своих воспоминаниях о ЧП из детства. Полный список гостей выпуска можно посмотреть тут (я там в классной к

7

29 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC752 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

К премьере «Человека-паука: Новый день» сообщество «Подкастозавров» подготовили подборку выпусков с обзорами фильмов, анимации, игр, комиксов и сериалов о Человеке-пауке. Слушайте подборку и бронируйте билеты в кино на премьеру!

👍6

26 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC957 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дэвид Кепп заново открывает для себя фундаментальные истины сценарного ремесла. А мы вместе с ним Когда Стивен Спилберг захотел вновь вернуться к теме существования внеземной жизни, именно Дэвид Кепп получил от него многостраничный сюжетный план, набросанный в заметках на айфоне. Ему предстояло превратить его в сценарий. «День разоблачения» стал пятым сценарием Кеппа, поставленным Спилбергом. С «Парка Юрского перио

13

25 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC826 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На этих выходных поговорим об авторе «Дня разоблачения». И нет, не о Спилберге, а о сценаристе Дэвиде Кеппе. По его сценариям поставили почти 40 фильмов, включая «Парк Юрского периода» и «Войну миров», так что ему есть, чем поделиться. А что еще важно — он не боится собственных провалов, признавая, что на каждый хороший фильм у него найдется свой «Индиана Джонс и колесо судьбы».

10👍8

25 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC820 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«День разоблачения» — кино о поиске гуманности в абсолютно антигуманный период человечества Сколько было разговоров вокруг нового фильма Спилберга: маэстро снова сдулся, фильм банален и конспиративен, а серые человечки с большими глазами — да это он издевается. Где тот Спилберг, который заставлял задумываться об эмпатии роботов в «Искусственном разуме», о границах дозволенного силовым органам в «Особом мнении» или о

👍16🥱43👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @starostinflix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 709,645 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Денис, посоветуй” (@starostinflix), 3,250 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starostinflix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.