Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Starknet Punks πŸ’Ž

Channel

Starknet Punks πŸ’Ž

@starknet_punks

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

209subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001620567579
TypeChannel
Username@starknet_punks
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 22 May 2022β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/starknet_punks

Growth

209214211.57 August 2026 β€” 214 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 214 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 213 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 209 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 208–215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 16:37209-4
14 Aug 2026, 19:36213-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:49214no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:45214first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 May 2022 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘6752.3%
πŸ”₯2116.4%
❀2015.6%
πŸ₯°64.69%
πŸŽ‰32.34%
😱32.34%
🀯32.34%
🍾21.56%
🐳21.56%
πŸ†10.781%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2022 to 18 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 May 2023, 16:46 UTC491 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Who still did not send the address of his purse, decided to give more time, you have until May 24, to unsubscribe me @nelson27zzz

πŸ‘1

11 May 2023, 16:25 UTC495 viewsread 8 August 2026

The list is updated, those who are on the list and did not indicate their wallets, email me @nelson27zzz, I will add to the table, you have until May 19

6 May 2023, 16:36 UTC561 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Not everyone in the top 50 specified their wallets, the table will be redone among those who made it to the top 50, in the days to come we will update the list

πŸ‘1

6 May 2023, 15:58 UTC499 viewsread 8 August 2026

The results of the drawing are summed up. Thank you all for your participation https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YoybvmnyBuH8Mvz6uAwdXS6IeNm64jXtSFWNTAjjR64/edit?usp=sharing

12 Apr 2023, 07:02 UTCβ‰ˆ1,380 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Drawing of 100 NFT Starknet PunksπŸ’Ž Closed alpha community for NFT Starknet Punks Holders πŸ’Ž πŸ’ŽYou have a chance to win if you invite at least one person πŸ’ŽFor every winning account 1 punk Conditions for participation: 1. be subscribed to @starknetpunks channel 2. Subscribe to the bot where the drawing will take place: @starknetpunksbot 3. Invite at least 1 friend by referral link. (he must also subscribe to our chann…

πŸ‘14πŸ”₯4🐳2

9 Apr 2023, 17:24 UTC830 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

What is the value of the πŸ’Ž Starknet Punks NFT collection? A closed community of NFT Holders of the Starknet Punks collection. Squeeze from various privates, scripts, multi-account guides and more, what you can find both open and closed access. A little bit about the Starknet Punks collection πŸ’Ž - A creative approach to creating a nft collection, our collection consists of over 150 attributes. Including many unique …

πŸ‘6❀3πŸ†1πŸ”₯1

6 Apr 2023, 19:10 UTC730 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Another portion of our work. The work is in full swing.

πŸ”₯5🍾1πŸ‘1

29 Mar 2023, 19:41 UTC399 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

About the Starknet Punks nft collection. Currently busy building the website. ROADMAP nft of the Starknet Punks collection has been written out πŸ’Ž

πŸ‘4❀1πŸŽ‰1πŸ”₯1

29 Mar 2023, 19:41 UTC328 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Starknet Punks πŸ’Ž How is our collection different from other similar ones? In our collection, punks will have unique attributes that the original and similar punks on other blockchains do not have. This affects both the uniqueness and the visual component. In addition, we have Starknet Punks in our collection that we created specifically for the Starknet blockchain theme What are your future plans for your project?…

πŸ‘3❀1🍾1πŸ”₯1

5 Aug 2022, 08:46 UTC464 viewsread 8 August 2026

The results of the drawing are summed up in @airdroptg2022 everyone thanks for participating. NFT will distribute after the listing of the collection.

2 Jul 2022, 14:03 UTCβ‰ˆ1,260 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

πŸ’ŽπŸŽ Giveaway for $2,500 and 120+ NFTπŸ’« is hosted by Starknet Punks in conjunction with other projects, including 10 NFT Starknet Punks How to participate. Invite friends and subscribe to sponsor channels 1. 1000$+NFT 2. 500$+NFT 3. 250$+NFT 4. 200$+NFT 5. $150+NFT ⚑️ 6th through 10th place: $100+NFT ⚑️ 11th to 51st-NFT Registration bot: @TG_AirdropBot ⏰ Giveaway from 06/30 to 07/31 Good luck and success to all πŸ˜‰

πŸ‘9πŸ”₯3❀2πŸŽ‰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @starknet_punks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œStarknet Punks πŸ’Žβ€ (@starknet_punks), 209 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starknet_punks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.