Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОЛЕГ СТАРИКОВ

Channel

ОЛЕГ СТАРИКОВ

@starikov_live

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,702subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004484999456
TypeChannel
Username@starikov_live
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 12 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/starikov_live

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

5,920 average views per post against 4,702 subscribers — an engagement rate of 125.8%. Across the 39,583 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.01% and 25.8%, with a median of 13.9%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (17 July 2026 16 August 2026)
Posts measured21 of 21 published in the window (0 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled124,230
Mature posts only139.7% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers4,702 measured 15 August 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 39,583 channels · p10 3.39% · p25 7.01% · p50 13.9% · p75 25.8% · p90 42.6%
Position in cohort99.492th percentile · 9.1× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.062% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 90.5%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

4,6684,7024,6856 August 2026 — 4,668 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,668 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,677 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,701 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,702 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,663–4,707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:584,702+1
12 Aug 2026, 06:074,701+24
9 Aug 2026, 12:414,677+9
6 Aug 2026, 15:064,668no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:474,668first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
125.8%
avg views ÷ 4,702 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,920
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held24 (12 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total124,230
Reactions total4,307
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5,073 reactions across 24 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,68552.9%
💯74314.6%
74214.6%
🤔2464.85%
🔥1092.15%
😢1072.11%
👏1042.05%
😁701.38%
🙏410.808%
👎370.729%
🐳290.572%
🤣290.572%
🙈190.375%
🤡160.315%
💊150.296%
🥴120.237%
💩110.217%
🥱100.197%
🤮80.158%
🦄80.158%
15 further kinds320.631%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,073reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC≈1,100 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Оперативная обстановка На Лиманском направлении и северном фланге восточно-запорожского направления ВСУ ведут активную оборону. Украинским подразделениям удалось добиться определённых успехов: они сдерживают продвижение противника и не позволяют российским войскам развивать наступление. В результате российские подразделения вынуждены втягиваться в оборонительные бои и не могут быстро продвигаться вперёд. При этом н

👍24🙏1510🤔3😐2🐳1

11 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈2,500 views159 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Продолжение... Например, если сторона А постепенно перейдёт от: «Сторона Б должна принять условия стороны А» к «Нам достаточно зафиксировать достигнутое». А сторона Б — от: «Мы должны вернуть все территории военным путём» к: «Наша главная задача — сохранить государство, армию и возможность вернуть территории политико-экономическими средствами". Иначе, фронт будет двигаться на километры, города переходят из рук в

👍9723🤔21💊6💯5👎41🐳1

11 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈2,400 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Фазы войны Мне на одном из эфиров задали вопрос о том, есть ли схожесть или различия в фазах большой войны ирано-иракской (1980-1988) и российско-украинской (24.02.2022 - ). Глубокий анализ ведения затяжных войн показывает, что они имеют чёткие границы или по другому фазы, и их можно проследить, что я и сделаю. Фаза 1 1980 - начало 1982 – наступление Ирака. Саддам рассчитывал на быструю победу. Ирак захватил част

👍42🤔2019👏5🐳4👎2

9 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈3,360 views239 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Взводно-ротное мЫшление Окончание когнитивной операции под громким названием "40 дней принуждения Кремля к миру" показала, что за 5 лет войны у нашего высшего военно-политического руководства не нашлось времени подобрать специалиста высокого уровня, который будет вырабатывать стратегию ведения войны с РФ. Напоминаю моим слушателям, что есть понятие Большой стратегии, которая определяет политические цели войны. Кст

👍127💯8023🤷3🐳2👏2🔥1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈5,870 views253 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Не забудем, не простим Я задался вопросом, знает ли история факты, когда враждебные государства, которые воевали друг с другом, одновременно с этим еще и торговали друг с другом? И знаете, мои уважаемые подписчики, я открыл для себя очень интересные факты, которые указывают, что война войной, а бизнес бизнесом. Ниже по тексту приведу примеры из истории, которые многих введут в когнитивный диссонанс. Читаем, анали

👍102💯8352😁5🤷‍♂4🥱4😡2👌1

4 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC≈5,890 views543 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Приведет ли Перелом к Возмездию? В геополитике мы сейчас наблюдаем проведение уникальных когнитивных специальных операций, которые проводят враждующие стороны. Украина вместе со своими союзниками с начала июля начала проведение стратегической когнитивной специальной операцией, назовём её "Перелом". Цель данной операции – сформировать широкое ожидание у население и элит Украины, Запада и внутри РФ о том, что «Рос

👍404🤔5643👏19🦄8🔥5🤡3😁3

2 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC≈7,210 views197 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Sophist_UA

Михайло Федоров заявив, що під час війни не розглядає можливість переходу в опозицію до Президента. Також він повідомив, що не планує проводити зустрічі з учасниками акцій, — The New York Times В інтерв’ю він закликав змістити фокус із питання його посади на обговорення стратегії ведення війни. 1. А що таке - чому це не хочемо зустрічі? Картонні активісти, вас кинули? Відчуваєте? А таки ж кинули. Поки ви там в опоз

👍96💯7710💩8🤣3👎1👏1🤡1

1 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈6,430 views138 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Не только про войну — но и про искусство, которое помогает жить дальше. К нам в студию пришла Лариса Кадочникова, Народная артистка Украины и настоящая муза Сергея Параджанова. Получился удивительно теплый, глубокий и вдохновляющий разговор. Поговорили о культовой ленте «Тени забытых предков», гении Параджанова, работе с Юрием Ильенко, несостоявшемся Голливуде, современной украинской культуре, войне и главных вехах в

👍8749🙈2

1 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈6,270 views75 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Друзья, подпишитесь на канал Ланы Шевчук, не пожалеете. https://t.me/lana_shevchuk1402

👍61👎64🤔2🤣2

31 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC≈7,430 views243 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Герои нашего времени Сейчас в мире есть два руководителя государств, которые борются между собой за лидерство в информационной сфере. Так уж сложилось, что США и ЕС вырастили Владимира Зеленского, которого Дональд Трамп, президент США, называет лучшим продавцом в мире. Оба используют примерно одинаковые способы и методы, которые в политологии называются типом поведения близким к персонализации власти. Отличительн

👍125💯6236🐳5🔥5🤔5🤡2👎1

29 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC≈6,160 views279 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Понты дороже денег? Я задал себе вопрос – Почему в украинской политике так часто успех подменяется обещаниями, а публичная риторика — реальными результатами? Не стала ли "хлестаковщина" одной из особенностей современной политической культуры? Ответ скорее политологический, чем исторический, и на него нет единственного объективного ответа. Однако, есть несколько факторов, когда распространённость громких обещаний

👍18755👏25🤔6🔥3🐳1👎1💯1

28 Jul 2026, 07:34 UTC≈6,520 views153 reactionsread 12 August 2026

И когда на море качка... Встреча Президента Зеленского и нового премьера Британии Энди Бернема на борту авианосца "Королева Елизавета" на базе ВМС в Портсмуте несет в себе несколько чётких и символических сигналов. Во-первых, это преемственность и незыбленность курса. Владимир Зеленский стал первым иностранным лидером, которого приняло новое руководство британского правительства. Выбор места и формата подчеркива

👍88🤔20🙈1712🤣5😢4🐳3🤮2

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @starikov_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 140,499 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОЛЕГ СТАРИКОВ” (@starikov_live), 4,702 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starikov_live.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.