Channel
@starboi_tdm
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001926959838 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @starboi_tdm |
| Description | Come backπ’ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 19 August 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/starboi_tdm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 3 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 3 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 August 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 13 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
708 reactions across 15 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β‘ | 117 | 16.5% | |
| π | 72 | 10.2% | |
| β€ | 68 | 9.60% | |
| π₯° | 65 | 9.18% | |
| π³ | 43 | 6.07% | |
| π₯ | 39 | 5.51% | |
| π | 33 | 4.66% | |
| π | 32 | 4.52% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 29 | 4.10% | |
| customΒ 5282959681323541706 | 23 | 3.25% | |
| π | 23 | 3.25% | |
| customΒ 6033055649187761128 | 15 | 2.12% | |
| π¦ | 15 | 2.12% | |
| π― | 14 | 1.98% | |
| π€© | 14 | 1.98% | |
| π | 13 | 1.84% | |
| πΎ | 11 | 1.55% | |
| πΎ | 10 | 1.41% | |
| π | 8 | 1.13% | |
| π | 8 | 1.13% | |
| 17 further kinds | 56 | 7.91% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 708reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2023 to 13 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
ΠΠ°Ρ ΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡ
2019-2024
π14πΎ9β‘8π8π7π―7π³6π6
.β£οΈ
β‘31π27π24π19πΎ5π₯4π3π2
π
β‘27β€βπ₯5π4β€3π3πΎ3π2π€―2
Real
π―3β€1
π
β‘41π37π³36β€6π¦5β€βπ₯3π€―3π₯2
π
π¦3β2β‘2β€2β€βπ₯2π2π2π―2
πΊ
β€1
π
4:3 ΠΌΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·Ρ ΠΠ° ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ Π½Π°Π΄ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π³Π°Π΄ΠΎΠΉπ€‘
customΒ 52829596813235417066β€4customΒ 60330556491877611284β€βπ₯3β‘2π2π€©2πΎ1
End 2023π©»
customΒ 52829596813235417064β€3β€βπ₯2customΒ 60330556491877611282β1π1π1π³1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @starboi_tdm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,040,625 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππππππΊπΏβ (@starboi_tdm), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starboi_tdm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.