Posted without readable text

Channel
Stan’s thinking
@stan_thinking
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
825subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002019187911 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stan_thinking |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stan_thinking |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 825 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 829 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 830 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 830 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 829 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 30 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
279 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 79 | 28.3% | |
| 🔥 | 77 | 27.6% | |
| 😁 | 75 | 26.9% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 7.53% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 6.81% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 2.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.358% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 105
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 16
- of 18 we hold a reading for · 89%
- Most on one post
- 52
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stan_thinking. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 April 2025 to 14 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Надеюсь это заключительный пост о кринже😁 404 ошибка
😁6👍4🔥1
Еще кринжа навалили. Оплата за билеты проходит по банковской карте, без возможности оплаты криптой😁 😅🔨
😁16🔥5👍4❤1👏1
В этом году больше пространства. (Из-за того что будет меньше людей) Ton foundation анонсировали Ton Gateway 2026🫠 По предварительным данным туда поедет как минимум 2 человека: Вуди(мб), Миша свапкофи(газ газ газ), Карен(акула), нанкок(мб) Это был предварительный список участников гетвея спустя сутки с анонса. На самом деле очень грустно наблюдать за текущим курсом тона, за огромнейшим упором в подарки, казино и …
🔥6👏4😁3
Ton foundation исключили данные токены с таблицы. Видимо предыдущие ошибки мемландии всё же не учли(когда меняли всё прямо во время соревнования) 🙄 Еще видел новость, что советник AlphaTon заявил что мемкоины херня, скоро пойдут ко дну. Тем временем ton foundation: Запускам meme republic!🤦♂️🤦♂️ Cringe🤦♂️ Upd: сотрудник ton foundation сказал, что просто не успели.
🔥6😁5👏2👍1
MEME REPUBLIC началась! вкратце это турнир среди токенов с 10 призовыми местами по 100к💵 начнем с интересных моментов: К турниру не допустили "утилитарные" токены, однако токены $LLAMA и $JVT участвуют в турнире. 🦙⭐️ Но в это же время например токен $WEB3 не допустили к турниру, тк он утилитарный. Что там за неразбериха происходит у тф, я хз🤷♀️ еще они токен $DUST переименовали обратно в $SCALE🌅🔁⚙️ мой выбор в д…
👍6❤4🔥4
Нытьё.🤬 Как вы знаете, на днях происходил очередной дроп стикеров, в котором шанс определяло кол-во заблокированных в апке тонов.❤️ Для 100% шанса выигрыша, надо было занести порядка 1700 тон, что я собственно говоря и сделал(см. скрин)💳 В итоге приложение начало лагать в эту же минуту, как начался «клейм». Со стороны команды всё зависло, они обработали около 400 заявок.🤡 (у меня есть запись экрана, где я в течени…
👍10😁10🔥8
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌐 TON Domains: Simple Names for Blockchain Addresses What’s in a name? TON domains turn long, complex blockchain addresses into simple, memorable names like yourname.ton. With a domain, you can: ▪️ Receive payments without sharing full wallet addresses ▪️ Host decentralized websites accessible in Telegram ▪️ Maintain a consistent identity across TON apps ▪️ Connect to smart contracts for personal or business use P…
🔥5❤3👍3
Не лучшее время для сбора инвестиций, но всё же. ⭐️Команда jvault пошла в gamefi историю и создали игру, подобную slither.io 🔤 🏆Суть игры такая же как и в оригинале, съешь всех и выйди чемпионом. Но для каждой игры будет ставка в usdt, благодаря чему азарт возрастает. 💸Сейчас собирают инвест для хорошего старта как игры так и маркетинговой компании, если кому интересно, то вот ссылка на пресейл токена. Токен будет…
👍4🤔2😁1
Павел, предлагаю развивать web3 интернет на базе .ton доменов. Давай сохраним свободу слова в интернете🛡🌐
👍14🔥9❤4😁3
Совсем скоро будет аирдроп от №1 лендинг протокола на тоне EVAA😇 Об этом я узнал из инстаграм. Это хорошо или плохо?😁 Я сначала подумал что мне показалось, но нет. Ссылка ведет на официальный сайт тге. С одной стороны Онбординг людей с веб2 в веб3 это круто. Но с другой стороны это настолько нет людей в тоне? Исходя из того что реклама тге крутится отовсюду я делаю выводы, что ваучеры переоценены.🔽
😁9👍6🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @stan_thinking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stan’s thinking” (@stan_thinking), 825 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stan_thinking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.