Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

сталодушно

@stalodyshno

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,060subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001718318403
TypeChannel
Username@stalodyshno
Created17 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stalodyshno

Growth

13,05613,06513,060.56 August 2026 — 13,065 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,064 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,062 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,056 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,057 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,062 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,060 subscribers13,0606 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,055–13,066 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:2813,060-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:1113,062+5
11 Aug 2026, 07:3213,057+1
10 Aug 2026, 09:2413,056-6
8 Aug 2026, 06:5113,062-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:5113,064-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:1913,065first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.1%
avg views ÷ 13,060 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,160
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held34 (18 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total311,420
Reactions total13,161
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13,161 reactions across 34 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,38348.5%
🤣3,39725.8%
🔥1,78713.6%
💯3712.82%
💅3102.36%
💘1591.21%
😭1571.19%
😱1310.995%
🎉830.631%
🗿610.463%
👀520.395%
🍾490.372%
🍓440.334%
170.129%
🤡160.122%
💋140.106%
😎140.106%
👾130.099%
🐳120.091%
🙈120.091%
11 further kinds790.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC≈2,840 views285 reactionsread 13 August 2026

тільки повернувся з неба. без гравітації не сподобалось!

🤣237229🕊8🤪3👻2🔥2💯1

12 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC≈4,180 views147 reactionsread 13 August 2026

2 ХВИЛИНИ!!!!!

😱10525🤣8🔥6🍓2👾1

12 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC≈4,600 views292 reactionsread 13 August 2026

але загалом, це мені смішна конспірологічна теорія (але подивимось через 38 хвилин, чи це теорія змови. ахахаха). там ще була: що світ це ж все створене давно американцями і суперкомпʼютером. і дуже багато кешу накопилось за весь час, і його треба почистити. тому, відключають сервери, щоб перезагрузити систему і щоб почистити кеш. і як відключать, то всі закони перестануть діяти, в тому числі і гравітація. і ми всі п

🤣162104💅13💘8👾3🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈4,680 views250 reactionsread 13 August 2026

я вже зрадів, що ми всі вижили, а виявилось, що це буде через ГОДИНУ!!!!

🤣20233😱10🤪5

12 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈4,820 views181 reactionsread 13 August 2026

6 ХВИЛИН!!!!

🤣13920😱8😨4💘3🍾2🐳2😈2

12 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈5,310 views375 reactionsread 13 August 2026

те, що буде дуже-дуже важка зима ми знаємо, а про те, що гравітація землі вимкнеться на 7 секунд о 16:33 МИ БУДЕМО МОВЧАТИ??? куди себе привʼязувати!!!

🤣32230🐳6😈6😱5🕊3🔥2💘1

11 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈5,360 views398 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @naukaua

в цьому тг каналі несправедливо мало підписників. і це не реклама. одразу кажемо. просто український стендап це топ. і його має бути більше в нашому житті точно.

310🔥47🤣18💅12💘4🍾3💯3🍓1

11 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈7,240 views303 reactionsread 13 August 2026

в цьому тг каналі несправедливо мало підписників. і це не реклама. одразу кажу. просто наука це топ. і її має бути більше в нашому житті точно.

255💯25💘173🔥2😴1

11 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈5,320 views163 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @naukauaVideo

⌚️ Ваші смарт-годинники показують 91 бал за сон та відмінне відновлення, а ви почуваєтеся так, ніби всю ніч розвантажували вагони? Або ж роками намагаєтеся стати «жайворонком», відчуваючи провину за кожен пізній підйом? Річ не у вашій ліні чи відсутності дисципліни. Загальноприйняті норми пульсу, сну та реакції на стрес зібрані з тисяч інших людей. А у ваших генів — власні налаштування. Наприклад, бути «совою» — це

136💘117😇4🔥3😱2

11 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈5,530 views241 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

олх, як завжди, дарує приколи: футболка нєвонючая вродє. ахахаха чимось пахне, але чи воняє, чи ні — це вже вам і оточуючим вирішувати. і, раптом що, це малоймовірно кауфман. хоча автор наче пише про кайфмена. це інший

🤣185🗿3117👾4💘2🤮2

9 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈6,060 views200 reactionsread 13 August 2026

нові варіанти. я тут торент. https://youtu.be/BCaxsw6GaKg

132🔥50💘8🍓6🎉2👻2

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @stalodyshno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 43,233 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“сталодушно” (@stalodyshno), 13,060 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stalodyshno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.