Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Staishhaa vlog

@staishhaavlog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,098subscribers

-225 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002678487710
TypeChannel
Username@staishhaavlog
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/staishhaavlog

Growth

9,0989,3239,210.57 August 2026 — 9,323 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,323 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,314 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,234 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,098 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 5 days, net -225. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,064–9,357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:269,098-136
10 Aug 2026, 12:529,234-80
7 Aug 2026, 22:019,314-9
7 Aug 2026, 17:169,323no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:089,323first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.9%
avg views ÷ 9,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,180
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held18 (1 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total93,160
Reactions total5,026
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,026 reactions across 18 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,72474.1%
❤‍🔥4238.42%
💘2504.97%
🥰1302.59%
🔥1262.51%
👍761.51%
😘551.09%
😍420.836%
🙏410.816%
👏240.478%
🦄210.418%
🍓190.378%
💋170.338%
👌150.298%
😁140.279%
🫡130.259%
🎉60.119%
🙊50.099%
🤓50.099%
🌚40.08%
8 further kinds160.318%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,026reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @staishhaavlog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC≈2,260 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Попробовала снять НОВЫЙ ФОРМАТ для себя в TikTok, поактивничайте там пожалуйста, и как вам такое в принципе?🐒

76🎉6💘6🙊4👍1

11 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈2,760 views127 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А как ваши делишки, РОДНЫЕ сладусики??????!

101🥰17💘7🤬2

11 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈2,860 views134 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Сегодня перезаписывала кусочек песни, хочу вас приятно удивить 🥹🥹 Фан факт раньше я вообще не придералась к своему звучанию и каким-то фальшивым моментам, а сейчаааааас во мне проснулся какой-то перфекционист и мне надо прям вылизать все моментики в треке🧚🏼‍♀️

100💘19🦄15

11 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC≈2,780 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

68💘17👍4🦄1

11 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈3,140 views192 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Топ 10 нишевых локаций для свиданий: 1. Столовка СИНЕРГИИ

156🔥19🥰12💘3❤‍🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC≈3,590 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У меня есть знакомый, который вообще не любил готовиться к экзаменам . Зато любил сидеть в телефоне. В какой-то момент он просто подписался на несколько преподавателей, потому что «ну пусть будут». А потом оказалось, что многие темы он уже где-то видел. Просто потому что регулярно натыкался на них в ленте. Иногда подготовка выглядит вообще не так, как мы её представляем. Оставлю вам ссылки на эти каналы, подписывайт

47💘3🔥3👏1

10 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC≈3,770 views211 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

151❤‍🔥29😁14🍓11👍3💘3

9 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈4,720 views292 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ПИТЕР 1 часть 🩵 - впервые в жизни прокатилась на Сапсане - встретилась с подружкой Сашей (фотограф красотка, фоткает у Кокошки, вы могли видеть в бэках бэкрумс) - встретилась с Маей (невероятно талантливая девочка художница), забрала картину, поснимали тиктоки, безумно счастлива и благодарна - отбивались от паука с моей новой подругой Сашей - наслаждалась красотой ночного Питера

203❤‍🔥51👍27💘5🥰4💋1😘1

7 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC≈6,060 views690 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Прикиньте как моему будущему мужу повезёт 🧍‍♀

496🥰88❤‍🔥72💘20💋6😘5💊2🍓1

6 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC≈6,720 views323 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Любимки, придумайте надпись пожалуйста🩵🙏🏽🙏🏽

253🔥37💘27😘3❤‍🔥1💋1💯1

6 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈5,910 views246 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

172❤‍🔥36🔥22🥰6🤓5💘3😘2

6 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC≈5,700 views272 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

188❤‍🔥41😘26💘15💋2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @staishhaavlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 174,358 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Staishhaa vlog” (@staishhaavlog), 9,098 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/staishhaavlog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.